• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is too much timing bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Highbredcloud
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jul 27, 2004
#1
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #1
I'm running 20* timing with 48psi of fuel with vacuum off out of 30lb injectors...cars feels like crap...WTF...is it too much fuel or too much timing? Help me set the car where it is suppose to be at...I know that the stock fuel pressure should be around 39-40psi...however, it seems as if I set the fuel pressure at stock the car looses top end...at least it feels like it does...where should my timing be IF I run the stock fuel pressure?

GT-40 X heads
GT-40 intake
FTI cam...along the rest of the bolt ons on a stock bottom 302
3.73's with a 5 speed...HELP anyone
 

Gravel

Member
Mar 17, 2004
216
0
16
Bellingham WA
Jul 27, 2004
#2
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #2
Base timing of 20 is pretty high and is going to cause your eec advance to go way over MBT or Maximum Brake Torque spark.. This will cause you to loose power under load. I would recomend backing it down to the 4deg over stock that every one runs..
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 27, 2004
#3
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #3
i would try around 16 -18* initial and 38 lbs of pressure. those are big injectors, how rich is it running??
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 27, 2004
#4
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #4
I'm with drgn - those heads/cam will want more than stock timing. 16-18 and stock fuel pressure. Disconnect the battery for a while to clear out the computer, and let the computer re-learn with stock pressure and the new timing.

Think of timing this way - the spark plug fires as the piston is coming up. As you keep advancing the timing, you're firing the plug earlier and earlier as the piston is compressing the charge. It needs to be fired before the piston is at the top in order to give the charge time to burn as rpms increase. But there comes a point where if you set it off too early while the piston's headed up, pressures/temps get so high in the chamber that detonation occurs. No good.
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jul 27, 2004
#5
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #5
thanks guys...I set timing at 16* and 39 psi fuel pressure...car ran like crap at top end such as 3 and 4th gear...Than I set the timing back to 18* and 40 psi and the car runs much better...I did not reset the computer since as far as I know the computer is a learning computer and should re-learn the new settings right? Also could a TPS that is out of position make the car run like crap? I was thinking the MAF was the problems and was thinking about disconecting it and running the car with the MAF unplugged...any ideas if that is good or bad? I know my car is not running to it's full potential...and it is something dumb that is causing the car to run like crap...any thing that is obvious that I should look into? any selenoids or moduels that I need or may need to be replaced or cleaned...? I already checked my MAF sensor and it is clean...thanks guys...
 
N

notchback501993

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
203
0
0
Lansing, IL
Jul 27, 2004
#6
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #6
Sounds like someone didn't degree their FTI cam.
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Jul 27, 2004
#7
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #7
I think I'm running about 14 initial. Getting lots of ping when I stomp it real quik. Seems like the power is real flat on the top end. What's the stock timing? like 8*?
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 28, 2004
#8
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #8
yeah. 8. are you using high octane?
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jul 28, 2004
#9
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #9
notchback501993 said:
Sounds like someone didn't degree their FTI cam.
Click to expand...

yeah...after countless tries and assistance from Ed I just said F that and installed it straight up...the car made 291RWHP and 322RWTQ untuned...that's not where the problem lies...

I am running 93 octane at all times...
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 28, 2004
#10
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #10
Highbredcloud said:
yeah...after countless tries and assistance from Ed I just said F that and installed it straight up...the car made 291RWHP and 322RWTQ untuned...that's not where the problem lies...

I am running 93 octane at all times...
Click to expand...

sorry, i was asking pny pwr. what mass air are you using?
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Jul 28, 2004
#11
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #11
I'm using 87, should I set it at 8* ?
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 28, 2004
#12
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #12
PNY PWR said:
I'm using 87, should I set it at 8* ?
Click to expand...


Why don't you start using better gas? There is no reason not to.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 28, 2004
#13
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #13
Many, many drivability issues are caused by maf calibrations. What type are you using? Did you buy it new?

For what it's worth mine with typical bolt ons (H/C/I/Exh) runs 18 initial, 34 total timing at w.o.t. with regular 87 octane fuel - no detonation at all, even in the heat of summer.
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Jul 28, 2004
#14
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #14
I don't even run premium in my 954. It's a stock 5.0, stock maf. I just went out and put it at 8*, I'll try that and see what it does.
 

fastback65chris

New Member
Mar 26, 2002
46
0
0
Wichita Kansas
Jul 28, 2004
#15
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #15
question about my timing

I have a 1990 Gt pretty much stock except for intake coil and filter. I can only set my timing to 5 anything above that and the starter drags and the car will not turn over. You think my distributer is trashed or did my timing chain slip.
 
S

sidewayzisbest

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
427
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jul 28, 2004
#16
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #16
i got mine fuel set at 38psi.....and timing at 28 Total timing.....I use 93 octane

does that sound about right? for what i have
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jul 29, 2004
#17
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #17
Michael Yount said:
Many, many drivability issues are caused by maf calibrations. What type are you using? Did you buy it new?

For what it's worth mine with typical bolt ons (H/C/I/Exh) runs 18 initial, 34 total timing at w.o.t. with regular 87 octane fuel - no detonation at all, even in the heat of summer.
Click to expand...

I have a pro-M 77mm purchased it new and it is calibrated for 30# injectors...at least that's what I paid for...something just isn't right...thanks anyways guys...
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 29, 2004
#18
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #18
Chris65 - did you pull the spout out before trying to set it?

Highbred - beyond injector size, was it set up for your inlet configuration - cold air, or stock box, and also for the exact computer that's in your car, etc.? There's more to the calibration than just the injector size. If you have the data sheet that came with it, the ideal situation is to use a chip/tweecer to input the voltage/flow curve from the maf data sheet into the computer. The ecu expects a certain match between the voltage signal and the actual flow - the stock maf matches the computer's expectations. Sometimes, that match gets out of whack with aftermarket maf's. The only way to fix that is to change the transfer function in the ecu. One thing you can do is to borrow a stock maf (for your year computer) and 19# injectors and see how it runs. That may tell you if it's an maf calibration issue.
 

r6bullet

New Member
Jul 25, 2003
112
0
0
Jul 29, 2004
#19
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #19
Stock inital timing is 10* right?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 29, 2004
#20
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #20
r6 - yup - with the spout out...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Fuel Fuel Pressure Issue
  • justadude07
  • May 12, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
415
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 12, 2025
justadude07
J
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
273
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
157
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
92
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?