• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

JMC HYDRAULIC CLUTCH QUESTIONS

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67P51
  • Start date Start date Aug 29, 2007

67P51

New Member
May 2, 2005
29
0
2
Aug 29, 2007
#1
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #1

I need some feedback on the JMC hydraulic clutch system. I currently have a 67 with 351C and Tremec TKO with a Mcleod scattershield. I have broken two clutch cables in the past year. It is now set up with the "Mustang Steve" cable conversion.
Any opinions on the JMC install? The car has the factory power disc brake booster and I am a bit concerned about clearance on the firewall.
What about the scattershield, any mods needed? The JMC website mentions the late model bellhousing for most kits.

Any help is appreciated.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 29, 2007
#2
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #2
before you spend something like $600 on a hydraulic system, check with dazecars website and see if it is possible that his brackets can either be adapted to your trans, or if he has a bracket you can use. i bought his T5 hydraulic clutch bracket, and the workmanship is great. who knows, you might even talk him into using your trans for a prototype, and getting the first unit for free. daze? what do you think?
 

red65

Member
Apr 12, 2003
411
0
17
Ann Arbor, MI
Aug 30, 2007
#3
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #3
The JMC kit has worked well for me for the past ~3 years, including a fair amount of track time. It's on the pricey side, to be sure, but the installation was straight forward, part quality is good, and customer support from JMC was top-notch. I don't know if it'll clear a power brake booster (who needs power brakes?)
 

VTStang66

Founding Member
Apr 2, 2001
2,407
0
0
Rockwall, TX
Aug 30, 2007
#4
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #4
I have the JMC system on my car and I think it's garbage. Besides the fact that it's damn near impossible to bleed, it has an inherent design flaw so that even when it's bled completely and everything is working perfectly, the slave cylinder doesn't have enough motion to completely engage/disengage the clutch. I had to choose between having the clutch not disengage all the way, or tightening the freeplay adjustment way down so that it would disengage completely when I hit the pedal. Of course that way it was riding hard on the throwout bearing all the time, and wore it out. I'll never recommend the JMC hydraulic kit. I'm redoing the car now and I'll definitely be going with something else. Maybe it's just my combo, but it just didn't work on my car.

Centerforce II 11" clutch, tremec 3550 trans. I don't think the moment was too long on the clutch arm because it barely stuck out of the scattershield. I actually had to cut the scattershield a bit to use the hydraulic slave on there. Either their master needs to be bigger, or the slave needs to be smaller.

One more thing: If you do use the JMC system, MAKE SURE you remember to ground your engine. Mine was grounding through the clutch cable and it blew 2 of them when it sparked on the firewall. Very annoying problem.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Aug 30, 2007
#5
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #5
67P51 said:

I need some feedback on the JMC hydraulic clutch system. I currently have a 67 with 351C and Tremec TKO with a Mcleod scattershield. I have broken two clutch cables in the past year. It is now set up with the "Mustang Steve" cable conversion.
Any opinions on the JMC install? The car has the factory power disc brake booster and I am a bit concerned about clearance on the firewall.
What about the scattershield, any mods needed? The JMC website mentions the late model bellhousing for most kits.

Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...

Where did the cable break?

Was the pedal travel always easy, or did it 'bind up' right before the cable broke?

I have customer who has a similar setup to yours and had problems with the TO bearing hanging up on the adaptor between the scattershield and the trans (he has a t-56, but I think the adaptor is the same. It would bind up on the adaptor and "POP"..........
 

70dvr

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
46
0
0
Brandon, Florida
Aug 30, 2007
#6
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #6
I have the JMC set up. Late model bell housing, Centerforce dual friction clutch and Tremec 3550. 28,000 mile's and no problems. It was a pain to bleed though.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Aug 30, 2007
#7
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #7
VTStang66 said:
I have the JMC system on my car and I think it's garbage. Besides the fact that it's damn near impossible to bleed, it has an inherent design flaw so that even when it's bled completely and everything is working perfectly, the slave cylinder doesn't have enough motion to completely engage/disengage the clutch.
Click to expand...

Who did you buy the JMC kit from ? I'm curious. I've never had a problem until recently when they were out of stock. I tried a knock off and it had the same problem. Come to find out the knock off has a bore size that is too small which is the reason it doesn't work.....maybe you think you have a JMC ? Not to knock your intelligence, but they look identical. They even have dust boots on them that say CNC, even though CNC doesn't make them.

P51, it'll fit your booster as long as you don't have some odd ball pancake booster.
65-66 have the problems with the power boosters. They say you can't run them, but there is one I know of that fits.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Aug 30, 2007
#8
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #8
When I installed my JMC kit I bled it before I installed it on the tranny. Everyting else was installed so it was only the slave cylinder that wan not bolted down. I did not have any problems bleeding it that way. I don't have much time behind the wheel of the car yet so I can't give you an good idea of how it works but for the little I have (driving in and out of the garage to body shop/exhaust shop) it worked fine.
 

67P51

New Member
May 2, 2005
29
0
2
Aug 30, 2007
#9
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #9
My cables broke about 2/3 of the way down to the scattersield. the first time it was obvious that it had been getting pretty hot from the exhaust pipe/manifold. The outer sheath was partially melted. Second time aroud I wrapped it in that aluminized heat tape and slid some Aeroquip silicone fire sleeve up the lower 2 feet. Second cable shows no sighns of heat damage. I tried to route it as best I could, but it is pretty tight with the manifold and power steering ram cylinder. I am using the stock exhaust manifolds. I've been thinking of going to a set of Sanderson headers, but I need more info on those before I pull everything apart. The engine bay is pretty packed and I don't look forward to the swap.

Both times the pedal was pretty stiff, but smooth. It was just the last few drives before this last break that I felt it getting funny. Seemed to smooth out after a few cyles.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Aug 30, 2007
#10
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #10
I am using the JMC unit with T5 trans, FR clutch/pp and factory late model bell housing. I love it! No problems once I got it properly bled and I don't have any problems with clutch not disengaging. I am running Hooker Comp long tubes and have plenty of space with zero interferance. The cost weas $400, but I'll bet you are already past that with 2 cable failures, not to mention your time. Am running mine with power brakes also and as long as you have the factory booster, you should not have a problem. Lastly, the tech support was great as well. They definately are knowledgable about our classic stangs and understand service. You can click the link in my Sig and view some pictures of my install on my CarDomain page.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Aug 31, 2007
#11
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #11
If your worried about clearance, I saw they have a remote reservoir that I assume you could mount anywhere?
 

VTStang66

Founding Member
Apr 2, 2001
2,407
0
0
Rockwall, TX
Aug 31, 2007
#12
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #12
I don't remember who I got it from, not JMC, but it came in a JMC box with JMC instructions. Another thing that bothered me about it was that to bleed it I had to run brake fluid out all over my long tube headers and it ate the coating off.

Not to thread-jack, but is anybody running a hydraulic t/o bearing?
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Aug 31, 2007
#13
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #13
That cable shouldn't break in the middle. That's the strongest part.

Have you checked your ground strap lately? That's the wire from the engine block to the chassis. If you are missing one or its in poor shape it'll use the cable for a ground until you melt it in two.

I used to see Camaros with auto trans cables that would break the same way. They would work for a while, and then get real stiff, and then break. This would usually go on 2 or 3 times - untill the parts guy would open the hood and point "where's your ground strap". Those were the good old days when parts guys knew something..
 

garner67

New Member
Jun 30, 2006
68
0
0
SF Bay area
Aug 31, 2007
#14
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #14
Hydraulic TO bearing

VTStang66 said:
I don't remember who I got it from, not JMC, but it came in a JMC box with JMC instructions. Another thing that bothered me about it was that to bleed it I had to run brake fluid out all over my long tube headers and it ate the coating off.

Not to thread-jack, but is anybody running a hydraulic t/o bearing?
Click to expand...

Yep, I just installed a McLeod TO bearing, and it works great. Bleeding was simple, but I used a Mityvac, which may have simplified process.

Here are links to both the bearing and Mityvac:
http://www.mcleodind.com/product_guide.html
http://www.mityvac.com/pages/products_bcbe.asp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
122
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
615
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
873
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
174
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?