• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Just Another Random Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter justin82
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,829
10,509
203
polk county florida
Dec 2, 2017
#21
  • Dec 2, 2017
  • #21
You really want to beat on a tranny?
 
Reactions: revhead347

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Dec 2, 2017
#22
  • Dec 2, 2017
  • #22
Yep, confirm the motor's health with compression and leakfown check. And then if the valve stems are not leaking oil and oil pressure is good, just drive it. They are not quite as tough as a straight 6, but the valve stems/guides, the oil pump drive shaft and the rings were the first three to wear out eventually on Grandpa's overloaded plumbing trucks. The stock oil pump drive shaft can twist like a Twizzler for no special reason. My 79 5.0 did in overdrive at 60 mph. So if you are cautious, replacing it with a HD part when you change the oil pan gasket is cheap insurance.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 2, 2017
#23
  • Dec 2, 2017
  • #23
I'm not going to beat around the bush. A stock 5.0 engine makes so little power for it's size, it really doesn't have the ability to hurt itself. I would drive it however you want to. The mileage really doesn't matter a whole lot. If it's been reasonable maintained, it will last quite awhile.

Kurt
 
Reactions: justin82 and General karthief

88LXSleeper

Active Member
Jan 6, 2016
146
56
48
Dec 3, 2017
#24
  • Dec 3, 2017
  • #24
It's a sporty car, what's the use if you don't have fun with it. If it breaks you fix it, all cars break. Like they say, a ship is safe in port but that's not what they are made for. View: https://youtu.be/ldrDFD59NQU
 
Last edited: Dec 3, 2017

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Dec 3, 2017
#25
  • Dec 3, 2017
  • #25
God i have beat that motor stock like it owed me money. Hell i beat the dart block motor too. 7200 on the shift not lifting.

When the car had the stock motor id run it out to 5500-6 ish sometimes power shifting it . Suspension wasnt anything good back then so the fastest it ever went stock was 14.30s on 17 inch wheels with 3.55s and a gt40 intake .
 

Mantoga320

Member
Sep 13, 2017
26
12
23
Amberg, Germany
Dec 5, 2017
#26
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #26
Like the others say, I wouldn't worry too much. I've got 240,000 miles on my original stock motor and I've only had to replace some accessories. I don't race it, but I don't baby it either. Just have fun, and do regular maintenance. Transmission is also fine. It's on its third clutch. Also, don't worry about HP too much either. For me, the fun of driving this car is the direct power and torque you get at mid-range RPM's, without having to rev too high, and no wailing turbo. A nice throaty rumble at idle, and a kick in the pants in second or third gear is enough to keep me smiling. Sure, it's lost a little HP over the years, but an easier breathing air intake and exhaust have livened it back up.
 
Reactions: 88LXSleeper and General karthief

bird_dog0347

still married haven't seen testicles in years
15 Year Member
Jun 7, 2012
2,298
2,025
174
Little Elm, TX
Dec 5, 2017
#27
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #27
If you own a fox that you're scared to take beyond 4800 rpm... sell it. These things are a money pit for those of us that DO NOT race them. If you're worried about beating on the engine, then you need to stop what you are doing and put the fox away till you get a daily driver, then beat on the fox while you restore it.
 
Reactions: justin82 and madmike1157

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 6, 2017
#28
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #28
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. Advising somebody to beat on an old car is the same as telling them to beat on an old man.
My car never has never seen the north side of 3500 RPM, and even then was only because I decided to " romp on it" a little (Which I'm still ashamed to admit to, even now.)

A fox mustang was never intended to be anything more than the ugly step child at an S197/S550 car show. It doesn't look like a fast car ( Just ask your girlfriends). trying to force it to be will almost assuredly result in you being stranded on the side of the road, with your ugly step child now broken and bleeding in some bad part of town after 10 pm. Now what ya gonna do wise acre?
like you should even be out that late in the first place.......buncha hooligans, and street punks makin' all kinds of noise squealin tires, playin' your hippie hop music too damn loud, with your noisy damn lake pipes blastin!
All I'll say about that is that you'd better remember to take your flip phone with you when you go. Beating on it wildly-nilly with reckless abandon is comparable to jumping up and down with a gun barrel in your mouth.
Sooner or later there's gonna be somebody wishin they hadn't.

It needs to be driven slowly, rarely, and only in the best of weather to and from the drug store, else wise a parts breakage might prevent you from picking up your Viagra and Stool softener prescriptions.
Then what?
 
Reactions: cleanLX, 90sickfox, Nutty 5.o and 1 other person

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,829
10,509
203
polk county florida
Dec 6, 2017
#29
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #29
madmike1157 said:
.buncha hooligans, and street punks makin' all kinds of noise squealin tires, playin' your hippie hop music too damn loud, with your noisy damn lake pipes blastin!
Click to expand...
Flip phones? Hippie hop music? And lake pipes?
Mikes off his meds again!
 

88LXSleeper

Active Member
Jan 6, 2016
146
56
48
Dec 6, 2017
#30
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #30
I am one of those hooligans.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,829
10,509
203
polk county florida
Dec 6, 2017
#31
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #31
88LXSleeper said:
I am one of those hooligans.
Click to expand...
I bet mike is too.
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Dec 6, 2017
#32
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #32
Mileage has correlation to wether or not you can beat on it hard. New motors blow all the time, old motors blow all the time. There’s to many variables to be considered.

Its just like everyone says the 302 block limits are 500 hp...really there’s a magical number that causes the block to split....no its detonation from running out of fuel because you threw timing at it or you’re NA and the poor oiling design couldn’t keep up with the demand. No voodoo harmonic at 500 hp will cause the block to split the main webbing.

Obviously the car has survived this long, which means its earned the right to bounce the rev limiter and float the valves until the pistons bang them shut.

Give it hell!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox and General karthief

Ryuk

I love your drawers
5 Year Member
Apr 22, 2017
1,676
1,596
133
Dec 7, 2017
#33
  • Dec 7, 2017
  • #33
madmike1157 said:
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. Advising somebody to beat on an old car is the same as telling them to beat on an old man.
My car never has never seen the north side of 3500 RPM, and even then was only because I decided to " romp on it" a little (Which I'm still ashamed to admit to, even now.)

A fox mustang was never intended to be anything more than the ugly step child at an S197/S550 car show. It doesn't look like a fast car ( Just ask your girlfriends). trying to force it to be will almost assuredly result in you being stranded on the side of the road, with your ugly step child now broken and bleeding in some bad part of town after 10 pm. Now what ya gonna do wise acre?
like you should even be out that late in the first place.......buncha hooligans, and street punks makin' all kinds of noise squealin tires, playin' your hippie hop music too damn loud, with your noisy damn lake pipes blastin!
All I'll say about that is that you'd better remember to take your flip phone with you when you go. Beating on it wildly-nilly with reckless abandon is comparable to jumping up and down with a gun barrel in your mouth.
Sooner or later there's gonna be somebody wishin they hadn't.

It needs to be driven slowly, rarely, and only in the best of weather to and from the drug store, else wise a parts breakage might prevent you from picking up your Viagra and Stool softener prescriptions.
Then what?
Click to expand...

As long as they don't pull over on my lawn, break it all they want.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Dec 7, 2017
#34
  • Dec 7, 2017
  • #34
Black1987 said:
Mileage has correlation to wether or not you can beat on it hard. New motors blow all the time, old motors blow all the time. There’s to many variables to be considered.

Its just like everyone says the 302 block limits are 500 hp...really there’s a magical number that causes the block to split....no its detonation from running out of fuel because you threw timing at it or you’re NA and the poor oiling design couldn’t keep up with the demand. No voodoo harmonic at 500 hp will cause the block to split the main webbing.

Obviously the car has survived this long, which means its earned the right to bounce the rev limiter and float the valves until the pistons bang them shut.

Give it hell!
Click to expand...

I think the weight of evidence and convention is vast in opposition to your point of view on the cause for splitting a 302 through the main webbing. It doesn't take detonation to split a block. Also, detonation would manifest itself rather obviously on aluminum pistons and spark plugs, but they are usually perfectly fine when the motors are torn down.

Power alone will do it. Can they survive a pull or a season at higher levels? Sure, I've seen one go over 700 rwhp. The most conservative tune at that power level, however, is not going to prevent eventual destruction. The same motor (a turbo 347) I'm talking about at over 700 rwhp was tuned by Steve Petty using a Big Stuff 3 and blew up on the third trip to the track. It wasn't the tune or the quality of parts. The block was absolutely the issue.
 
Reactions: General karthief

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Dec 7, 2017
#35
  • Dec 7, 2017
  • #35
Black1987 said:
its earned the right to bounce the rev limiter and float the valves until the pistons bang them shut.
Give it hell!
Click to expand...
LOL!
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Dec 8, 2017
#36
  • Dec 8, 2017
  • #36
FastDriver said:
I think the weight of evidence and convention is vast in opposition to your point of view on the cause for splitting a 302 through the main webbing. It doesn't take detonation to split a block. Also, detonation would manifest itself rather obviously on aluminum pistons and spark plugs, but they are usually perfectly fine when the motors are torn down.

Power alone will do it. Can they survive a pull or a season at higher levels? Sure, I've seen one go over 700 rwhp. The most conservative tune at that power level, however, is not going to prevent eventual destruction. The same motor (a turbo 347) I'm talking about at over 700 rwhp was tuned by Steve Petty using a Big Stuff 3 and blew up on the third trip to the track. It wasn't the tune or the quality of parts. The block was absolutely the issue.
Click to expand...

The main purpose of my post was you can’t predict the survivability of an engine...only mitigate it.

We know the blocks suck, if they didnt suck, they probably would still be running (production) like the gm ls motor.

Again beat the brakes off the car its earned it. ( sorry for the delayed response....back to my bitcoin)
 
Reactions: FastDriver

88LXSleeper

Active Member
Jan 6, 2016
146
56
48
Dec 9, 2017
#37
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #37
I believe the Windsor block came out in 1962, the LS in 1995. That's a pretty long run, it's demise had a bit to do with economics. I would think Ford never imagined people would want to get 400 hp out of it.
 
Last edited: Dec 9, 2017

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Dec 9, 2017
#38
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #38
And yet, the early blocks were stronger than the later ones.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 9, 2017
#39
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #39
88LXSleeper said:
I believe the Windsor block came out in 1962, the LS in 1995. That's a pretty long run, it's demise had a bit to do with economics. I would think Ford never imagined people would want to get 400 hp out of it.
Click to expand...
That would be incorrect. Ford put a blower on the 289 in a 66 Shelby. Power was boasted to be right under 400.

Jerry Heasley
August 12, 2010
During last year's Mid America Performance Ford and Team Shelby Nationals in Tulsa, event organizer Jim Wicks rolled up to my photo location in John Atzbach's Candy Apple Red '66 Shelby GT350. Only this wasn't just any '66 Shelby. Under the hood was a Paxton supercharger. Only it wasn't just any Paxton supercharger. What made this car special was the fact that Shelby American had installed the blower at their Los Angeles airport facility in 1966. It's one of 11 '66 GT350s that was factory-equipped with the Paxton supercharger, and one of only three built in red.

Hyundai Certified Pre-Owned - Shop Hyundai Santa Fe Instead
Search Dealer Inventory & Find A CPO Hyundai Santa Fe. Continue at https://www.hyundaiusa.com/certified-pre-owned


Maybe the low production figure is what has kept this novel GT350 from super star status. If people like John Atzbach are an indication, these Shelby's could get more respect as the years pass. The Seattle-based entrepreneur knows a thing or two about collectibles. He specializes in Imperial Russian antiques and art. His collection includes enamels and Faberge, as well as porcelain from factories such as the Imperial Porcelain Factory, Gardner, Popov, and Batenin.

Top Searches


  • For Atzbach, the '66 supercharged GT350 was a major acquisition. This rare Shelby, 6S2265, popped up in a Mecum auction brochure. John "spent some time on the phone" trying to get full background information because he has been fascinated with the original '66 Paxton Shelbys since he was a kid. Although John says he's not a big fan of red cars, he particularly wanted a red supercharged '66 Shelby with white LeMans stripes. The odds were stacked against him in a universe of just three cars and millions of enthusiasts who would love to have a red, factory-supercharged GT350 in their garage.

    The Paxton supercharged '66 GT350s are a curiosity. Paxton Products, makers of the Avanti R-2 supercharger kit in the early 1960s, saw a much bigger market for their supercharger when the Mustang debuted in the spring of 1964. Naturally, they paid a sales call on Shelby American in Los Angeles. Carroll Shelby knew about the power-adding capabilities of the blower and lent them a '65 GT350, 5S425. Paxton's Joe Granatelli returned to the LAX facility with the supercharged GT350 for Carroll's approval. And what better way to test the car's mettle than to go up against a normally aspirated 289 in a 2,200-pound Shelby Cobra roadster? According to legend, the supercharged GT350 outran the 289 Cobra and Joe got an order for 500 Paxton superchargers.


    In the summer of 1966, Shelby American built an Ivy Green prototype, 6S051, for a possible GT350S model. They also promoted the supercharger, claiming a 46 percent increase in horsepower over the standard 289 Hi-Po, or a boost from 271 to 395 horses. As hot as the package was, Shelby American eventually decided not to offer the "S" model. However, they would install a Paxton on a new GT350 if a customer paid for the parts and labor. It just wouldn't be a special "S" model. Essentially, the supercharger became a high performance accessory for the '66 GT350. The production figure of 11 units includes the one "S" prototype.
 
Reactions: General karthief

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 11, 2017
#40
  • Dec 11, 2017
  • #40
88LXSleeper said:
I believe the Windsor block came out in 1962, the LS in 1995. That's a pretty long run, it's demise had a bit to do with economics. I would think Ford never imagined people would want to get 400 hp out of it.
Click to expand...

I love all these worshippers who go crazy when someone pushes 2000hp out of a Chevy 5.3 junkyard engine on an engine dyno. Do these people not realize that the same thing was being done with junkyard 351 engines 20 years ago?

Kurt
 
Reactions: General karthief
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Electrical 2000 GT Intermittent Engine Shutdown In Motion - DTC U1262
  • kenster1092
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
130
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2026
squeak93
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
234
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
J
Speedometer cable
  • Jimwbx
  • Sep 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
128
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 12, 2025
Noobz347
7
Engine Random hanging idle
  • 706 Saleen
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
432
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2026
86HO5.0
8
C
Engine Idle cuts out
  • claypoolxx
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
525
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 8:28 PM
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?