• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Just got back from the Dyno

  • Thread starter Thread starter HoofnIt
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 9, 2004
#1
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #1
I learned alot today and although I didn't quite reach the 300rwhp mark I am still happy with the outcome and my ping is GONE! The car also feels alot smoother and the fan temps were lowered.

stock, untuned 278hp 317tq
after tuning 283hp 316tq
minus Flowmasters 291hp 323tq

Bottom line the car did not perform better by adding more timing in the upper rpms. The power/torque curve pretty much peaks at 5000 and 4100 rpm respectively. My valvetrain was floating at 5800rpm but I think I need to readjust the valves and use 3/4 turn as opposed to 1/2 past zero lash. The tuner seems to think my Cobra intake (ported lower) is holding the power down. I'm pretty much falling off @ 5600rpms. Even with a different intake I guess the point would be mute without upgrading the valvetrain.

If anyone wants to comment I would appreciate it. I would post the graphs but they are a winPEP 7 file.

Thanks!

I found it very interesting that with the Flowmaster 2 chambers disconnected the car picked up 8 rwhp. Although I did not reach my goal of 300hp I came pretty darn close and the ULTIMATE goal is to attain high 12's at the track and with this data I know the numbers are there, now I will need alot of practice.
 
H

HRT11

New Member
Feb 2, 2004
122
0
0
Plattsburgh, NY
Nov 9, 2004
#2
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #2
nice numbers
cant believe the cat back held it back that much!
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Nov 9, 2004
#3
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #3
what did you guys do..........take a sawzall to it while on the dyno or something.....


jason
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 9, 2004
#4
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #4
We took off the 4 nuts that held each muffler/tailpipe in place. I think welding in some cutouts would accomplish the same thing. I will add that without the mufflers it was loud as H_LL!
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 9, 2004
#5
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #5
Who ever said you need backpressure?!

Have you ever seen inside of a Flowmaster muffler? If you have, you would know why they kill horsepower. It looks like Flowmaster welded metal bricks in the muffler...

Those are very impressive numbers for such a "small" cam.

Joe
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 9, 2004
#6
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #6
Damn nice numbers indeed. I wonder how much my stock tail pipes are hurting me... if I showed you pics of how they are butchered on there and how much of a restriction there is I think you'd crap. Hopefully I can address that issue soon. Again, congrats! Did you make peak HP at 5000rpms???
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Nov 9, 2004
#7
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #7
nice numbers, what do you hit 1/4 wise?
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 9, 2004
#8
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #8
Peak torque occured around 4000 to 4100 rpm. Yes, peak hp was @ 5000 rpm and started to fall off 5600-5700. I don't know how to post the graphs. I should be able to take a pic of the printed version if all else fails.
Does anyone know of some quality cut-outs? I'd love to be able to crawl under the sides of the car and turn a valve when I'm on the track but I want a good seal and no leaks.

I won't be able to take it to the track for another 3 months! I guess that will give me some time to get some drag radials.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 9, 2004
#9
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #9
I wanted to ask about your valves floating. It would seem to me that the
springs are quite not up to the task of controling the valves. I don't think a little less preload on the lifters would make a difference.

Are you using the regular AFR springs or the upgraded ones?

I've seen many folks get pretty good results with that cam.

Later
Grady
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 9, 2004
#10
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #10
Grady, the preload may not be affecting the valve floating but they are a little too noisy. The springs are not the upgraded versions. However, I am using 1.7 rockers. From the graphs it doesn't appear to be making much power past 5500 rpms so I don't see a need to run it past 57 or 5800 when I go to the track.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 10, 2004
#11
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #11
JFYI- I don't have the spring upgrade and I shift at 6000rpms and I have made dyno pulls to 6300.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 10, 2004
#12
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #12
Please don't look at a new intake until you get the valve train fixed - that could be holding the power down, not the intake. If it was ported correctly, it will make a lot of power. Here is the dyno results of one of my recent customers who went to a RPMII and lost lots of troque and power under 5,200 rpm compared to his ported Explorer.........
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Nov 10, 2004
#13
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #13
That's my favorite cam. I miss that thing. Good numbers!
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 10, 2004
#14
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #14
tmoss said:
Please don't look at a new intake until you get the valve train fixed - that could be holding the power down, not the intake. If it was ported correctly, it will make a lot of power. Here is the dyno results of one of my recent customers who went to a RPMII and lost lots of troque and power under 5,200 rpm compared to his ported Explorer.........
Click to expand...



Hmmm... I wonder which one I'd rather have and which one would be quicker. HINT HINT... it's not the RPM II! Thus another example of "bigger isn't always better."
 

Jo_885o

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
422
0
0
Clint. Twp, Michigan
Nov 10, 2004
#15
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #15
What are the specs of that crowler cam?
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Nov 10, 2004
#16
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #16
Final5-0, I sent you a PM offline & sort of off-topic. thx.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 10, 2004
#17
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #17
I agree with the guys on the valvetrain; Grady especially.

120# on the seat is not nearly enough pressure, and I'd imagine that the open pressure is in the 330-340# range. Just as a reference, my springs at 142# on the seat and 405# open. The springs aren't up to it. I hope for your sake that it is just a lifter preload issue, but I don't see that being the problem

Paul, I NEVER knew you were still running the stock AFR springs! Maybe AFR used to use a beefier spring "back in the day" when their SBF market wasn't so big? That's incredible, but kind of scary at the same time.

Joe
 

go.rei GT

New Member
Nov 29, 2003
267
0
0
Az
Nov 10, 2004
#18
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #18
What dyno did you go to, and what did they do to tune it? Did you still have pinging after putting on the AFR's?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 10, 2004
#19
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #19
A thought or maybe it is a Q, it don't matter. Paul says he has same springs as HoofnIt and has no valve float plus higher rpms.

HoofnIt is using 1.7 rr's. I don't think Paul is and that extra lift just might be the difference that is causing the float.

Later
Grady
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Nov 10, 2004
#20
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #20
As to losing power after 5000rpm, are your distributor & coil stock? If so, you may want to upgrade them. My stock V8 felt like it was losing some power around the 5000rpm range, just before my pig-of-a-AODE would upshift. I added a Performance Distributors dizzy and coil, and the car now pulls hard until my AODE upshifts. Granted, this is a seat-of-the-pants feeling, and not backed up with dyno numbers. But I think it's worth looking into.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Just got back from Anderson new dyno numbers
  • Kdubslugga
  • May 18, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 27, 2010
Kdubslugga
Just got back from the dyno.
  • jivepepper
  • May 23, 2006
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
950
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 24, 2006
Dan_Soprano
back from the track
  • Mustangless
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
696
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2006
NotQuik
Just got car back from painter.....
  • 97Snake1668
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
2
Views
757
Mustang Sound & Shine All Oct 4, 2005
zincyellow03
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?