• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Just got back from the Dyno!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67topless
  • Start date Start date Apr 22, 2006

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 22, 2006
#1
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #1
Man, that is a lot of fun; I can see how this could get addictive! Anyway, in preparation for this morning, I did the following (check out my signature for current setup):

  • New lighter springs in the distributor... when I took the old ones out, I could hardly pull them apart they were so old

  • New accelerator return spring (my old setup was rubbing on the intake manifold, it is silky smooth now)

  • Bought new secondary springs, but did not install them (wanted to see what it looked like with the stock first)

  • Verified that my timing was at 39 degrees total (this got adjusted down to 37 during the dyno)

  • Changed the fuel filter and spliced the fuel line (I had a crimp in the hard line under the chasiss... you may have seen a posting I had asking questions on that topic)


Anyway, here is the graph with the four runs I had:



The first run was a baseline with no changes and used 4th gear. The second run wasn't much different than the first... and again used 4th gear.

The third run had the timing adjusted to 37 degrees and used 3rd gear. The fourth run we added the lightest spring possible for the secondaries so they would open sooner and again used 3rd gear.

As you can imagine, my best potential for power improvement would be to get rid of the 2.79:1 rear and my 4sp toploader. Maybe a T5z with 3.55:1 or something... but that is a discussion for another day (and covered a million times I am sure on this forum).

With all that said, wow! My adrenaline is still kickin...
 

66ford289

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
100
0
0
Apr 22, 2006
#2
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #2
Thats awesome. Pretty flat looking torque curve. You have just inspired me to go work on the mustang today.
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 22, 2006
#3
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #3
Just noticed the graph I posted had a baseline of MPH... I think the RPM's are a better baseline. Check this out:

 

66ford289

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
100
0
0
Apr 22, 2006
#4
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #4
That helps alot, would you be willing to tell cam specs?
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 22, 2006
#5
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #5
Xtreme Engergy hydraulic flat tappet camshaft (comp cams part #31-238-3)

RPM range 1300 - 5600
Duration in 262 - ex 270

Here is a link to all the specifications.

http://competitioncams.carshopinc.com/product_info.php/products_id/14356/31-238-3

Scott
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Apr 22, 2006
#6
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • #6
I bet if you add a good set of aftermarket heads you will gain 50+ RWHP.
 

66ford289

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
100
0
0
Apr 23, 2006
#7
  • Apr 23, 2006
  • #7
coolblue65 said:
I bet if you add a good set of aftermarket heads you will gain 50+ RWHP.
Click to expand...

Speaking from experience?
 

Stangboy67

New Member
Aug 26, 2005
59
0
0
Lynnwood, WA
Apr 23, 2006
#8
  • Apr 23, 2006
  • #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolblue65
I bet if you add a good set of aftermarket heads you will gain 50+ RWHP.


Speaking from experience?


His (coolblue65) combination (289 w/ TF heads) would support that with his 275 RWHP. That would definately up the fun factor a notch!
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 23, 2006
#9
  • Apr 23, 2006
  • #9
coolblue65 said:
I bet if you add a good set of aftermarket heads you will gain 50+ RWHP.
Click to expand...

I bet you are right... the amount of money I spent getting those heads ported - polished and tapped for the roller rockers, I would have been well on my way to a set of nice heads.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Apr 23, 2006
#10
  • Apr 23, 2006
  • #10
66ford289 said:
Speaking from experience?
Click to expand...

Yeah I am, when I first rebuilt my motor good heads weren't in the budget, so I had some minor work done on the stock ones. After 2 years, I was able to get the Trickflows, and they added just about 50 RWHP and about 40 RWTQ.....with a healthy loss of compression because of the TF's 61cc chambers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3.08 gears with a manual trans
  • limp
  • Aug 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Qtrhrse23
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
232
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Alternator not charging
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
250
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 17, 2026
SchwarzStock
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
423
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?