• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

Just Got Some Money Need Help Spending It

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wickky
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2004

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 7, 2004
#1
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #1
Got 500 Saved Up What Should I Do. Want As Much Power I Can Get Out Of It

Ps No N2
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 7, 2004
#2
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #2
Well, you got options. The best bang/buck route would be to save up a *bit* more. Another 1-200 would give you enough to buy a camshaft, new springs, pushrods (~$350), and get a decent tune or chip (~200-350). You could just do the camshaft without a tune or chip, but you really wouldn't be getting the most of it. Add another 2-300 to that if you need to have someone install the cam for you.

If you've gotta spend it now, and can't get an extra few hundred, or just prefer the simple bolt-on route, then I'd go with an upper intake spacer ($90, easy as hell to install), and an underdrive pulley ($150, bit harder to install, but doable). Given that you have a CAI and exhaust already, that's about the limit of where boltons will take you. At that point I'd probably use the remaining 250 on a chip too. You'd have enough bolt-ons at that point that a decent tune would probably get you an extra 10hp at least. Chip, pulley and intake spacer total would probably net you around 15-25hp, depending on how good the tune is...
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 7, 2004
#3
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #3
how much would a chip with new cams,rr,springs, tb spacer and underdrive pulleys get me in 1/4 and rwhp and rwtq.

also how much 1/4 time if i got the stuff i just said plus 4.10
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 7, 2004
#4
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #4
Hold on there. Chip=250-350. RRs=250+. Cam+Springs=350. Pulleys=250. TB spacer is useless, but intake spacer=100. All of those add up to WAY more than the 500 bucks you started with.

But to answer your question, all of those should get you solidly into 14s. Maybe high 13s if you had a pretty wild cam, good tune, and are a better driver than I am. I'd say anywhere from 220-240 (max) rwhp and probably 230-ish tq. Depends largely on the cam profile you get, and remember than the one that makes 240hp at peak will almost certainly make less down low.

I dunno about the 4.10s.. what is it they say? Knock 0.3-0.5 off your 1/4 time with 4.10s? Something like that.
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 11, 2004
#5
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #5
danm were do i get the intake spacer
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#6
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #6
Go to 3.8mustang.com and message LHShockey1894. He makes em.
 

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,
Apr 22, 2003
843
0
0
VA Beach
Jan 12, 2004
#7
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #7
dpes he really need a chip with out a serious power adder.... i don't think so, ide say go with a body kit... i know it's not preformance but that stuff may not cost $500 but it will cost at least $500 or more to get it installed...
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 12, 2004
#8
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #8
97v6Silver said:
dpes he really need a chip with out a serious power adder.... i don't think so, ide say go with a body kit... i know it's not preformance but that stuff may not cost $500 but it will cost at least $500 or more to get it installed...
Click to expand...
Need? No. But it would help. Even on a completely stock car, a good tune, a little bit of spark advance, stuff like that, can help out and get an extra few horses. Adding pulleys, CAI, Exhaust, and an intake spacer would change the engine geometry enough that a good tune would gain some significant power, like maybe 10hp. Maybe more if you got someone really good.

So no, it's not *needed*. But it sure as hell would help him more than a body kit would!!!
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 12, 2004
#9
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #9
man i love the way my car looks now i just wanna beat some damn GT's
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 12, 2004
#10
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #10
Wickky said:
man i love the way my car looks now i just wanna beat some damn GT's
Click to expand...
With ALL the bolt-ons I mentioned above, you stand a chance of beating a stock 98 or older GT. If you're a good driver, and particularly if you get some high-ratio gears. You won't be beating any 99+ GTs any time soon, though. You need a cam + more to bump you up into that range.
 

BABstangV6

Smater than the average bear!
Apr 3, 2003
595
0
0
Rock Hill, SC
Jan 12, 2004
#11
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #11
gears are so nice, drooool
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 13, 2004
#12
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #12
4.10?
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 13, 2004
#13
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #13
Wickky said:
4.10?
Click to expand...
They'd be best off the line, but watch out if you do any highway driving...
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 13, 2004
#14
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #14
i heard it only raises ur rpm's by like 300
 
D

DanM

Founding Member
Jul 31, 2002
332
0
0
Jan 13, 2004
#15
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #15
Wickky said:
i heard it only raises ur rpm's by like 300
Click to expand...
Well you can calculate it. Stock axle ratio is 3.27:1. So with 4.10s, you'd always be revving 4.10/3.27 = 25% faster than you are now.

So at 75mph on the highway, when you're usually at about 2200rpm right now, you'd be at 2200*1.25 = almost 2800rpm.

Not awful, but not great for your engine and gas mileage.
 

1kwik6

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
749
0
0
dallas
Jan 13, 2004
#16
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #16
don't go with anything less than 4.10's. I have 'em and love them.I used to have 3.73's in my 7.5 rear end, but the 4.10's are soo much better. Especially with the cam. I'd buy the cam first and get a good tune.
 

Wickky

New Member
Jun 17, 2003
131
0
0
[]D []-[] [] []_ []_ Y
Jan 14, 2004
#17
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #17
ya zippo has 4.10 on his gt and it is insane....... so fast........
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 15, 2004
#18
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #18
http://www.rpm-mustangs.com/ocat/valvetrain.html try this link. it has some cams for lik 135 but you need the springs that they also sell and also either the roller rockers or the longer push rods and shim kit that is also offered. how about a good head porting and and pollish along with the intake. do you have headers. i was looking at them on ebay this morning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Car vibrating
  • Creomod
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 9, 2025
AeroCoupe
M
Need help!
  • Masonevans726
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
229
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 17, 2025
Masonevans726
M
P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
168
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
96 GT 4.6 w/ dirty spark plug well
  • Mustang Momma
  • Apr 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
120
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2026
LILCBRA
9
1994 Mustang GT 5.0 L Convertible
  • 94ns95
  • Jun 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
169
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2026
94ns95
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?