• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Just Installed An Slp Loudmouth... First Impressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ratio411
  • Start date Start date Aug 7, 2012

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 7, 2012
#1
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #1
My son thought that the MAC Flowpath cat-back I put on his 5.0 wasn't loud enough.
He complained that it sounded too much like "everyone else's" car... too much like a Flowmaster.
He is right about it sounding alot like a FM, and many other cars sounding the same, but it sounded good to me.

Anyway, he bought a Loudmouth, and we just installed it, here is my opinion...

Fit and finish: Excellent. Fits like a glove and the stainless is gorgeous. The entire cat-back is near polished, and can be finish polished if one so desired. The parts seem high quality, and it even comes with top notch band clamps.

The one thing that I didn't like is the use of so many joints. The MAC system had 2 joints per side, compared to the SLP having 5 joints per side! Made the install a bit more involved and time consuming.

Sound: LOUD. Too loud for me... But my son loves it, and I guess that is all that matters. Did I say it was loud? Way too loud...

He is running 1 5/8" non-equal shorty headers, BBK ORH pipe, and the engine is internally stock.

My .o2, your results may vary.
Dave
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 7, 2012
#2
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #2
BTW: I am now looking for opinions...

I have a MAC Flowpath (2.5") cat-back that I can put on my 87 GT...
but I also just had a pair of 2.25" Flowmaster 40s given to me off another 5.0...

Which would you put on a stock 87 GT?

My guess is that they will both sound roughly the same.
The car is so very stock, I am not looking for a performance gain. Fact is that the 87 is currently without muffler!
(As a side note, it sounds good running through the cats with no muffler. Better than the LM! and not nearly as loud!)
 

boostfrk

10 Year Member
Aug 30, 2011
712
69
59
Colorado
Aug 7, 2012
#3
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #3
Sounds like you liked the MAC you had on your sons car, right? Are the FM 40's you got just the mufflers or is it a complete catback system? What kind of condition are the FM's in compared to the MAC?

If the MAC is still in good shape, you like it, and it's a complete setup I'd install that. You know it works and you know you like it.
 
Reactions: ratio411

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 7, 2012
#4
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #4
I'd go with the Macs. Your son is crazy, Mac with an X pipe is one of the sweetest sounding 5.0 exhaust combos available. All loud with no sound quality, you may as well put him in a hillbilly truck with Cherry Bombs. To me LM's sound too much like an open exhaust, but to each his own.
 
Reactions: krazedstang, Gearbanger 101 and ratio411

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 7, 2012
#5
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #5
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Your son is crazy...
Click to expand...
No... he's 18!
Nuff said.
I remember when I was his age and knew it all.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 7, 2012
#6
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #6
boostfrk said:
Sounds like you liked the MAC you had on your sons car, right? Are the FM 40's you got just the mufflers or is it a complete catback system? What kind of condition are the FM's in compared to the MAC?

If the MAC is still in good shape, you like it, and it's a complete setup I'd install that. You know it works and you know you like it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I guess it really is that simple.
I like the MACs, they are complete, and in great shape.

The FMs are just the mufflers. I would just put turn-downs and dump them.

MAC it is. Easy cheezy.
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Aug 7, 2012
#7
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #7
ratio411 said:
No... he's 18!
Nuff said.
I remember when I was his age and knew it all.
Click to expand...
I'm 18 as well. My dad told me to straight pipe my car. I told him to piss off.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 7, 2012
#8
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #8
At some point, all sound and no balls is venturing into rice territory IMO, whether it's a Mustang or a Civic. I've seen 10 second cars that sound as quiet as any factory car.
 
Reactions: ratio411

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Aug 7, 2012
#9
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #9
Gotta loud stock cars that are deafening. Put the Mac's on your car, flowmasters suck.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 7, 2012
#10
  • Aug 7, 2012
  • #10
There used to be this burgundy red convertible LX that came to our local track all the time. If you saw this car, you'd say it's a nice looking stock car with Warriors on it. It literally sounded like a stock car..probably quieter than they were when new. No cam lope, nothing. No cowl hood, no stupid wing, but it did have a pretty serious cage, but we all passed that off as "cool effect" and because it was after all a vert. First pass it pulled the wheels about a foot off the track and ran 10s. You could actually hear the sound of the slicks sticking to the track and chirping over the sound of the car. You could take a newborn baby around the block in that car and it wouldn't know it.
 

wht93gtEd

Active Member
Nov 11, 2004
0
9
29
Jersey Shore, New Jersey
Aug 8, 2012
#11
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #11
If you have SLP, then it was designed on my car, so you're welcome!
SLP had my 93 GT for about a week back in the winter of '06 to design a kit for 87-93 GT's. They then hooked me up with a free system a few months later when it went into production.

After owning MAC and Flowmaster I can say that the SLP was leaps and bounds ahead of them in fit, finish, and quality. They really do make awesome parts.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 8, 2012
#12
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #12
Mac Flowpaths....40-series Flows....it's all the same. Both chambered mufflers, both sound identical. One isn't made to any higher standard than the other, nor does one suport any more horsepower than the other. Both sound great at idle, drone like a mofo at cruise and are hard to beat at WOT.

I had a Mac cat back on my last Fox and a Flowmaster knock off system on my current one. Ones as good, or bad (depending on your viewpoint) as the other.
 
Reactions: krazedstang

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 8, 2012
#13
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #13
I gotta completely disagree with you guys saying Macs and Flows sound the same. You guys must be tone deaf. Flows have a really deep rumble to them...Macs have a more rippy throaty sound. Ironically, i think Mac sound like crap with an H, and Flows sound like crap with an X, but Macs with an X and Flows with an H have a sound all their own. I've had'em all except Bassani, and i wouldn't bother because i don't like the sound or the price. I've settled on Magnaflow and will probably never change them.
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Aug 8, 2012
#14
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #14
I love the way the FMs sound on my car, BBK equal length shorty headers and a Bassani hi flow catted x pipe (picked that up for $100 off a friend). I agree i think SLP is just too loud with no tone.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 8, 2012
#15
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #15
wht93gtEd said:
After owning MAC and Flowmaster I can say that the SLP was leaps and bounds ahead of them in fit, finish, and quality. They really do make awesome parts.
Click to expand...

Materials and finish are really top notch. High quality, and a price to match.
Fit is good when all is said and done, but there really are too many joints to deal with and each must be clamped and adjusted, making install a pain in the butt. The MACs are just 2 parts per side, and a breeze to install with ball and socket joints instead of clamps. They may not be as pretty under the car, but the MACs fit perfectly too, and were not poor quality at all, just cheaper materials.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 8, 2012
#16
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #16
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I gotta completely disagree with you guys saying Macs and Flows sound the same. You guys must be tone deaf. Flows have a really deep rumble to them...Macs have a more rippy throaty sound. Ironically, i think Mac sound like crap with an H, and Flows sound like crap with an X, but Macs with an X and Flows with an H have a sound all their own. I've had'em all except Bassani, and i wouldn't bother because i don't like the sound or the price. I've settled on Magnaflow and will probably never change them.
Click to expand...


I too have used most of the popular (and unpopular) brand mufflers out there at one time, or another and am quite sure I'm not tone deaf. The two mufflers are built using the same pricipals, based on the same open chamber design, are almost dimensionally identical and create damn near the same sound. Yes...pairing them up with different components or compariong mufflers of different inlet/outlet diameters are going to change the sound a little, but the mufflers themselves sound very much like on and other.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 8, 2012
#17
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #17
Gearbanger 101 said:
I too have used most of the popular (and unpopular) brand mufflers out there at one time, or another and am quite sure I'm not tone deaf. The two mufflers are built using the same pricipals, based on the same open chamber design, are almost dimensionally identical and create damn near the same sound. Yes...pairing them up with different components or compariong mufflers of different inlet/outlet diameters are going to change the sound a little, but the mufflers themselves sound very much like on and other.
Click to expand...

Well, you can get a Chinese electric guitar from Walmart that's built around the same design as a Les Paul, but they won't sound anything alike

Also i've cut open both mufflers, and the baffles making up the chambers are pretty different between the two. I used to make m own 1 chamber Flows.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 8, 2012
#18
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #18
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Well, you can get a Chinese electric guitar from Walmart that's built around the same design as a Les Paul, but they won't sound anything alike

Also i've cut open both mufflers, and the baffles making up the chambers are pretty different between the two. I used to make m own 1 chamber Flows.
Click to expand...
Meh...there are only so many ways to make a mouse trap. They all do the same thing in the end though.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Aug 8, 2012
#19
  • Aug 8, 2012
  • #19
I agree with 85SS. You guess must be deaf. Mac's and flowmasters do not sound nearly the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
306
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Komo's 1990 GT - Parts Gathering Purgatory & Home Remodel
  • gkomo
  • Sep 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 102 103 104
Replies
2K
Views
71K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 10:38 PM
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?