• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Just wanted to say thanks and ask a question

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Shape
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2004

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Jul 19, 2004
#1
  • Jul 19, 2004
  • #1
I posted in here a few times over the past couple of days asking questions about a '93 coupe I was looking at as a daily driver. I brought it home on my trailer saturday night. They told me they thought it had jumped time. After looking it over I determined it had a bad ignition module. I replaced it and it started right up! Wanted to tell everyone who replied to my threads thanks for the help. Ok now for the tech question. What is the deal with 4 cylinders and 8 spark plugs?????
 
T

techdbw

New Member
Apr 10, 2004
35
0
0
Jul 19, 2004
#2
  • Jul 19, 2004
  • #2
the 91-93 2.3 mustangs used the dual plug set up for emission reasons. However on the plus side the engine is rated at 105hp whereas the earlier 2.3 was rated at 88hp. The other changes were an increase in compression, mass air EFI, and a roller cam setup, instead of the slider cam setup. Some say the roller cam is responsible for most of the hp increase.

Adding a turbo to this engine is fairly easy, because it has mass air you can use 30 or 36 lb injectors from a 5.0, add the exhaust manifold and turbo and get a good power increase. If you plan to go over 10psi of boost you will need to replace the stock cast pistons with forged pistons. You can find more info at therangerstation.com

One note from experience, if you replace the plug wires, get the set that has the built in boot puller for the drivers side #3&4 cyl. It makes replacing plugs a lot easier.
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Jul 20, 2004
#3
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #3
techdbw said:
the 91-93 2.3 mustangs used the dual plug set up for emission reasons. However on the plus side the engine is rated at 105hp whereas the earlier 2.3 was rated at 88hp. The other changes were an increase in compression, mass air EFI, and a roller cam setup, instead of the slider cam setup. Some say the roller cam is responsible for most of the hp increase.
Click to expand...

The roller cam is responsible for most of the power increase. And just so you know, EFI came out in 87, not 91. You're right about the emissions control reasons for having a dual plug head, I think that also there was an original intent to have the motor burn more efficiently than the single plug head. I guess those two things are linked though.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Jul 20, 2004
#4
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #4
JamesBaumann said:
And just so you know, EFI came out in 87, not 91.
Click to expand...

Wait til I tell my '84 it isn't EFI!!!







-but I know what you meant.
 

Jquintel

Member
Jun 8, 2003
194
0
16
Fort Wayne, IN
Jul 20, 2004
#5
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #5
techdbw said:
the 91-93 2.3 mustangs used the dual plug set up for emission reasons. However on the plus side the engine is rated at 105hp whereas the earlier 2.3 was rated at 88hp. The other changes were an increase in compression, mass air EFI, and a roller cam setup, instead of the slider cam setup. Some say the roller cam is responsible for most of the hp increase.

Adding a turbo to this engine is fairly easy, because it has mass air you can use 30 or 36 lb injectors from a 5.0, add the exhaust manifold and turbo and get a good power increase. If you plan to go over 10psi of boost you will need to replace the stock cast pistons with forged pistons. You can find more info at therangerstation.com

One note from experience, if you replace the plug wires, get the set that has the built in boot puller for the drivers side #3&4 cyl. It makes replacing plugs a lot easier.
Click to expand...
so as long as you stay under 10psi of boost a stock motor will hold up, as long as the motor is in good shape?
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Jul 24, 2004
#6
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #6
Jquintel said:
so as long as you stay under 10psi of boost a stock motor will hold up, as long as the motor is in good shape?
Click to expand...

Good question > Anybody?
 
8

89' RICE COOKER

New Member
Mar 3, 2003
325
0
0
Po-town Oregon
Jul 25, 2004
#7
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #7
hold up? i wouldn't say so. last a whole summer? maybe if your good to it. If your motor is in good shape then i wouldn't recommend TRYING to ruin it. if you plan on doing a REAL turbo swap down the road soon, then go for it. Just start saving up for a new motor right when you bolt up that turbo. But for as much money you would be spending on a turbo, maifold, ect. You could likely find a complete turbo motor and drop that in. Then you wont have any headache causing problems down the road. Plus you could run twice as much boost, which would feel like twice as much power.
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Jul 25, 2004
#8
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #8
No turbo for this car. It is just gonna be my daily driver for running around town to the store and stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Help with initial Microsquirt ignition setting
  • germain101
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
577
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
N
Power door lock motor Question
  • NYFox
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
270
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
NYFox
N
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
263
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
187
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?