• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Just wondering, whats the best intake for a stock 5.0???

  • Thread starter Thread starter fivelitercoupe
  • Start date Start date Apr 17, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

fivelitercoupe

Member
Nov 12, 2003
132
0
17
Longwood, Florida
Apr 17, 2004
#1
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #1
As the question says, what do you guys think is the best intake for a stock 5.0? Also what kind of numbers have you guys seen after swapping intakes? thanks guys....
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Apr 17, 2004
#2
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #2
Send a private message (pm) to tmoss on the forum here. He ports the stock lower intake for a very reasonable price (much less expensive than replacing the whole thing) which significantly improves its flow characteristics. The lower is the biggest bottleneck to flow on the stock engine - he can tell you what to expect in terms of improvements.
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Apr 17, 2004
#3
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #3
Edelbrock performer and it's long runners will net you some great gains on a stock 5.0.. It's a tried and true intake and I picked up a ton of ET when I did the swap on an old set stock long block set up. you can usually find them used in the 3-350 range
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Apr 17, 2004
#4
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #4
From the research I have done the street heat by Trick Flow is a very good bang for buck aftermarket intake. It even seemed to out perform the track heat from Trick Flow. I had a dyno sheet on a mostly stock motor with all the intakes and the street heat was 3rd. The only better ones was the Holley and I think the Performer RPM but not by much. If your completely stock the I've heard the larger flowing intakes can hurt more than they help.
 

Visceral

New Member
Jun 23, 2003
790
0
0
Portland, OR
Apr 17, 2004
#5
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #5
CRASH7772 said:
I had a dyno sheet on a mostly stock motor with all the intakes and the street heat was 3rd. The only better ones was the Holley and I think the Performer RPM but not by much.
Click to expand...

Do you still have access to that sheet or know where we can find a copy? THats some pretty amazing info if it exists.
Im putting an Extrude Honed Cobra intake on my otherwise stock engine. Currently Im running 239/305 to the rear wheels, so I'll dyno after Ive got the new one on.

chris
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Apr 17, 2004
#6
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #6
Visceral said:
Do you still have access to that sheet or know where we can find a copy? THats some pretty amazing info if it exists.
Im putting an Extrude Honed Cobra intake on my otherwise stock engine. Currently Im running 239/305 to the rear wheels, so I'll dyno after Ive got the new one on.

chris
Click to expand...

I will look around and see if I can find the sheet.....odds are 50/50 on finding it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 19, 2004
#7
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #7
Visceral said:
Do you still have access to that sheet or know where we can find a copy? THats some pretty amazing info if it exists.
Im putting an Extrude Honed Cobra intake on my otherwise stock engine. Currently Im running 239/305 to the rear wheels, so I'll dyno after Ive got the new one on.

chris
Click to expand...

I'd like to see your curent combo curves and then the EH dyno curve. I think your gonna loose on average torque over the 2,000-5,500 rpm range - we'll see.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Apr 19, 2004
#8
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #8
I have a Cobra and like it!
 

Visceral

New Member
Jun 23, 2003
790
0
0
Portland, OR
Apr 20, 2004
#9
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #9
tmoss said:
I'd like to see your curent combo curves and then the EH dyno curve. I think your gonna loose on average torque over the 2,000-5,500 rpm range - we'll see.
Click to expand...

I dont doubt that its too big for my current setup... but I got a great deal on it, and I have *alot* of room to grow.

Besides, I shift down to about 4-4.5k rpm and up to 5400-5500 at the strip currently. If I make power within that, currently thats all that matters. The car has more than enough torque for these crappy wet streets.

Im going to add 1.7 rockers and some new valvesprings at the same time, so we'll see what happens.

chris
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Apr 20, 2004
#10
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #10
I'll be waiting for those numbers. I have been looking at Explorer, Cobra, GT-40, and all that good stuff. Still don't know exactly what to go with...and money is a problem for me lol.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 20, 2004
#11
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #11
I would go with the TMOSS, probally will give the best overall gains and definatly the best price by far, save the money and get some gears. The aftermarket intakes are a must if you have head work, or aftermarket heads but don't really do much for a stock engine. The systmax I uses the stock upper, and probally doesn't do any better than the TMOSS.

The TFS Street intake has runners which are too large. It makes up for this with long runners but still looses velosity. Many people loose tq and get worse times due to this problem. The Cobra is a really good intake, the GT40 although overpriced is also good, and the explorer might not have the "fame" but flows like the Cobra and GT40. The Performer is nice, I have it and like it, lots of expandability.

My recomendations: Get the TMOSS and save towards other mods, like gears and heads, then upgrade after that. I am sure the TMOSS intake will sell for about what you paid for it, so no/little money lost, but lots of tq to gain.
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Apr 28, 2004
#12
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #12
Sorry guys this is all I could round up. Only problem is that this motor is anything but stock. Go down and click on the intake shootout or something like that. There is 2 or 3 different ones one of which was on more of a stock motor but only had like 3 or 4 different intakes.

http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomf...ww.andersonfordmotorsport.com/media/media.htm
 

IMissMy93Fox

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
143
0
0
Apr 28, 2004
#13
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #13
I had the Cobra on mine and I liked it, wasn't exactly stock but it did have stock heads. I don't know too much about this TMOSS stuff but from what I've read on here it seems to be a good deal.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Apr 28, 2004
#14
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #14
gt-40 is nice. has anyone heard anything on that new bbk intake?
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
May 1, 2004
#15
  • May 1, 2004
  • #15
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/574.shtml


Edelbrock Performer pretty much took top honors,

although I thought the part of the HP chart on gt40, cobra, and explorer was real interesting.
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
May 1, 2004
#16
  • May 1, 2004
  • #16
Visceral said:
Do you still have access to that sheet or know where we can find a copy? THats some pretty amazing info if it exists.
Im putting an Extrude Honed Cobra intake on my otherwise stock engine. Currently Im running 239/305 to the rear wheels, so I'll dyno after Ive got the new one on.

chris
Click to expand...
What have you done to put out that kind of power on a stock engine??
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
May 1, 2004
#17
  • May 1, 2004
  • #17
i installed a typhoon intake on my 88 which has a 90 model marquis motor with crappy e6 heads.the internals are bone stock except for a b303 cam.the car had an 86 model intake(crappy)and it really woke the car up.
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
May 1, 2004
#18
  • May 1, 2004
  • #18
holley intake, huge improvement over stock even w/factory heads, feels like a diff car.
 

cmb91LX

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
432
0
0
Memphis
May 1, 2004
#19
  • May 1, 2004
  • #19
239/305

239/305 does seem an awful lot compared to the median 180-190 hp of a truly stock motored 5 liter. How do you figure these numbers, do you have a small shot of gas, maybe 50HP?
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
May 1, 2004
#20
  • May 1, 2004
  • #20
notice the holley or tfs r intakes are not in that test, holley is #1 efi intake
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Electrical 93 5.0 No Injector Pulse
  • machinermac
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
221
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 1, 2026
Willybill32
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
226
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?