• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

K-member ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88Stangboy
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2005

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 12, 2005
#1
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #1
Has anyone used or know of how good Granatelli K-members are?
Or does anyone know of any really good K-members? Im looking
for one and i don't really know about the quality of any of them.
Im looking for the lightest and strongest one...any help would be
greatly appreciated.
 
C

coming4you

New Member
Jun 17, 2005
32
0
0
Toms river NJ
Dec 12, 2005
#2
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #2
ive had a qa1 in my car for over 2 years.. and its great quality the install does however suck compared to some others ive heard of... the lower control arm bolts/nuts have to be ground down nearly to nothing for them to thread on.. Other then that no problems and great room/access to everything needed
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 12, 2005
#3
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #3
I was looking at a QA1, will all the stock suspension work with it? Like springs, A-arms...or do you have to run aftermarket A-arms and coilovers?
This is what im worried about, i want to use as much of my existing front suspension as i can for the time being. I will eventually install tubular front A-arms and coilovers, but not anytime before summer.
 

joncash

just high enough to be functional
Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
756
4
39
The USA's peen
Dec 12, 2005
#4
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #4
Yep, the QA1 wil work for sure. I saw one get installed on a customer's car w/ the stock front suspension and it fit just fine.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 13, 2005
#5
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #5
I have the Granatelli unit. It is a heavier K-member, but very sturdy. More for road racing. I was going to get the GP unit, but they sent me the GMS unit because they said the GP was junk and a liability concern. Got one hell of a deal, a $700 setup for $400.
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 13, 2005
#6
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #6
Im pretty sure im going to go with the QA1, in Summit it goes for about $230 bucks. I think im going to throw in some tubular A-arms, are the QA1's any good, or is there a better set for about $200-$300.
 

soontobefastfox

Member
Nov 15, 2005
275
0
16
Troy, Michigan
Dec 13, 2005
#7
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #7
My vote goes for Maximum Motorsport's K-Member.
 

joncash

just high enough to be functional
Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
756
4
39
The USA's peen
Dec 13, 2005
#8
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #8
With the QA1 tubular control arms and nearly all others you have to run coilovers because there is no spring pocket for a stock style spring. If yopu can get the money together (or wait for a while) it should be cheaper to get the whole ProActive system in one shot than piece by piece.
 
J

jerryD

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
1,061
0
37
Gladstone, MO
Dec 13, 2005
#9
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #9
THe QA1 will change your wheelbase some. prob move the front wheels forward. some folks don't like it cause then they have tires rubbing the fender well area.


AJE has the whole thing with what you want to do. you can run the k-member with stock arms, just have to buy the spring perch option from them $40. Tube A-arm with spring perch as well, or just a plain tube a arm with no perch? your choice. they have it. www.ajeracing.com
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Dec 13, 2005
#10
  • Dec 13, 2005
  • #10
jerryD said:
AJE www.ajeracing.com
Click to expand...

Dito ... or MM www.maximummotorsports.com
 
B

blackcloud50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
388
0
0
Dec 14, 2005
#11
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #11
AJE or www.paracing.com

Maximummotorsports you have to use tubular A- arms and coil over

QA1 moves the your wheels
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 14, 2005
#12
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #12
yea, see thats what i dont want. I don't want a K-member that moves your wheels but does let you use the stock A-arms and springs. What negative affect does it creat when it moves your wheels? Do you have a gap behind the back or your front tires and the fender? Does it ride different? This is my main concern, i mean the wheel movement...anyone know the negative effects?
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 14, 2005
#13
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #13
I just looked at the PA unit and it sounds exactly what i want for absoblute sure. I can get everything i need from them including the spring perches. It sounds great for my needs, thanks to all that replied to my thread, it helped me alot!
 
B

blackcloud50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
388
0
0
Dec 14, 2005
#14
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #14
88Stangboy said:
I just looked at the PA unit and it sounds exactly what i want for absoblute sure. I can get everything i need from them including the spring perches. It sounds great for my needs, thanks to all that replied to my thread, it helped me alot!
Click to expand...

PA unit is the one I was going to use as well when I get one. I also wanted to utilize my stock A-arms and springs. I also heard great things about the fitment and quality as well.
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Dec 14, 2005
#15
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #15
blackcloud50 said:
PA unit is the one I was going to use as well when I get one. I also wanted to utilize my stock A-arms and springs. I also heard great things about the fitment and quality as well.
Click to expand...


It seems like the best one for the job im trying to accomplish. Im trying
to loose as much weight from my car as humanly possible, but still keeping
it completely streetable and at least some what comfortable. The PA
K-member does that as far as i've heard, the main thing i wanted from it
was it to be strong and not have it bend or the welds crack or anything.
But i also needed to keep my stock A-arms cause i ain't got the money
right now for tubular ones....(Very budget build) But its the one im
getting, hopefully before christmas.
 
B

blackcloud50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
388
0
0
Dec 14, 2005
#16
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #16
Cool...be sure to let us know how it works out for u
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Electrical 1987 Map Light
  • Riley Barth
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
122
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
Mustang5L5
Reaching a member.
  • Malala
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
104
The Welcome Wagon Dec 6, 2025
Malala
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
D
97 V6 suspension upgrades
  • Dale1bre
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
292
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
Noobz347
K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
194
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?