• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

K-member...

  • Thread starter Thread starter JymboSlice
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

JymboSlice

Member
Dec 9, 2008
385
0
17
Dec 9, 2008
#1
  • Dec 9, 2008
  • #1
Hey...I'm about to put a whole bunch of crap on my car. so im wondering if i should get a k-member, a-arms, and a coil over kit. idk if i should get one tho...any suggestions would be great...thanks.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Dec 9, 2008
#2
  • Dec 9, 2008
  • #2
yes, call maximum motorsports, or griggs racing. install and enjoy.
 

JymboSlice

Member
Dec 9, 2008
385
0
17
Dec 9, 2008
#3
  • Dec 9, 2008
  • #3
MM is too expensive. and idk about griggs. anyone heard anything about granatelli's or PA Racings?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Dec 9, 2008
#4
  • Dec 9, 2008
  • #4
PA is decent, Granatelli is junk.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Dec 10, 2008
#5
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #5
PA Racing is good, UPR is also a good option.

Bill
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Dec 10, 2008
#6
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #6
i have had nothing but good luck with upr. i if i had the money i would try mm. for lackof a better word, granatelli is junk.
 
P

poindexternasty

New Member
Apr 29, 2008
148
0
0
Dec 10, 2008
#7
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • #7
Ditto, Granatelli is garbage.
 

smokin00GT

New Member
Mar 22, 2007
80
0
0
United States
Dec 12, 2008
#8
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #8
I used granatelli,didn't fit, and the jerks didn't want to refund money after seeing proof it was way off, bought PA Racing, and had it coated silver to match my car.... fit great. It's worth it to pay a little more for one that fits
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Dec 13, 2008
#9
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #9
I have the upr kit and it has worked great. Also one of the lightest.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Dec 13, 2008
#10
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #10
Stedda has the QA1 for under $270 and its a quality piece. It comes with spring perches if you wana avoid doing a coilover. Then you can get the AJE control arms with perches too. They are $340 from LMR and without the perches are $300. So for around $600 you can have a nice set up. QA1 is a reputable company and if thats what Steeda uses then you know its a stout piece
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Dec 13, 2008
#11
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #11
my k is apparently an MM copy(granitelli), so i recommend MM. QA-1 seems a bit weak but thats just how it looks to me. i use qa-1 arms.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,166
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Dec 13, 2008
#12
  • Dec 13, 2008
  • #12
Is the car a daily driver?

I wouldn't run an aftermarket k-member on a daily driven car. They aren't exactly tested for 100K miles of potholes and bumps and bangs. Only one i would trust on my car is a MM k-member.

UPR just seems too flimsy to me as well.
 

JymboSlice

Member
Dec 9, 2008
385
0
17
Dec 14, 2008
#13
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #13
The car only gets driven about 20 miles a day...in the summer of course....if its raining i dont drive it. and i avoid pot holes and stuff like that. so i think im going to go with UPRs kit. i just need a kmember so i can have room for a oil pan and long tube headers. and to save more weight so i can beat up on all the s**t rice cars. thanks for all the advice guys.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Dec 14, 2008
#14
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #14
JymboSlice said:
The car only gets driven about 20 miles a day...in the summer of course....if its raining i dont drive it. and i avoid pot holes and stuff like that. so i think im going to go with UPRs kit. i just need a kmember so i can have room for a oil pan and long tube headers. and to save more weight so i can beat up on all the s**t rice cars. thanks for all the advice guys.
Click to expand...

Then the upr is the one you want. I have had the headers off twice and changed the motor mounts since. Both jobs were easy with this kit. Plus it's the ligheast and cheapeast among the decent set ups.
 
W

wingless wonder

New Member
Dec 14, 2007
14
0
0
Dec 15, 2008
#15
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #15
Griggs, you get what you pay for. Steeda is interested profit margins not quality.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Dec 15, 2008
#16
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #16
Mustang5L5 said:
Is the car a daily driver?

I wouldn't run an aftermarket k-member on a daily driven car. They aren't exactly tested for 100K miles of potholes and bumps and bangs. Only one i would trust on my car is a MM k-member.

UPR just seems too flimsy to me as well.
Click to expand...

Proof of that last statement?

I had a UPR tubular K-member in my car for close to 80k miles with zero problems. I hit pot holes, even bent one of my weld prostars, bottomed out on another pot hole so bad the pavement scraped the powder coating off. Obviously I didn't look for them to hit it was just one of those things as I drove the car 75 miles a day and to and from races all over the east coast.

Bill
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,166
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Dec 15, 2008
#17
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #17
Mustang92 said:
Proof of that last statement?
Click to expand...

Everyone is entitled to their opinions..and i have my own.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Dec 15, 2008
#18
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #18
Mustang5L5 said:
Everyone is entitled to their opinions..and i have my own.
Click to expand...

So you trash a companies product without anything to back it up...fact, opinion or otherwise? You do realize that chromoly has a higher tensile strength than mild steel right?

Bill
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,166
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Dec 15, 2008
#19
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #19
Mustang92 said:
So you trash a companies product without anything to back it up...fact, opinion or otherwise? You do realize that chromoly has a higher tensile strength than mild steel right?

Bill
Click to expand...


If you owned a Granatelli K-member, would you have called out the three members here that called it garbage without stating any facts? What about the person who trashed the Steeda K-member? Or are you singling me out for saying the UPR peice "looks flimsy" because you own one and wish to justify your purchase? You made your choice and that's fine, don't get upset because of my opinion on the part.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Dec 15, 2008
#20
  • Dec 15, 2008
  • #20
I've been happy with my upr and drive it like it's stock.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
81
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Y
2004 Roush - Dome Lights and radio not working
  • Yurei
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
358
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
squeak93
Ball Joints Question
  • 93gtmustang
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
381
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
AeroCoupe
C
5.0 into a 1999--what computer ?
  • chazmanaz
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
161
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2025
Noobz347
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
197
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?