• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

K&N Drop in Filter

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91lxstangowner
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2011

91lxstangowner

Member
May 7, 2011
65
0
16
Jul 30, 2011
#1
  • Jul 30, 2011
  • #1
Has anyone used one in a 2.3 n/a dual plug head before? If so post your results and what you thought about it. I'm thinking of getting one for mine but I want to know if its worth the money first.
 
K

KhanTyranitar

Member
Apr 21, 2011
93
1
9
Aug 1, 2011
#2
  • Aug 1, 2011
  • #2
K&N filters have very poor filtering efficiencies, which means they let a lot of dirt through the filter media into the engine. They are known to foul MAF sensors, which your truck has, and cause valve seat and piston ring damage.

There are better and less expensive options out there now. Remember, that the first priority of an air filter is that it removes dirt from your intake so that it does not go into your engine.

Before we move further, lets clarify a few things. For starters, the stock paper air filter actually flows more than the engine needs by a huge factor. This means if you put a freer flowing filter, it yields no increase in power unless you do supporting mods to enable the engine to breathe better. This usually means larger valves, ported heads, ported intake, larger throttle body, and smoother intake tube. It also usually requires mods to increase the redline of the engine, and often a cam. In other words, you would be doing enough modifications to a 110 hp engine to make it produce ~160 hp N/A before a freer flowing filter would even be justified.

K&N Filters claim to save money and the environment by using a washable reusable element. However, you have to clean the element with their cleaner, and use their oil. You have to let it air dry after cleaning, if you use an air compressor to blow it off, that ruins it. So you have hours of downtime while you clean the beast. Combined with engine and sensor damage, inconvenience, and initial price they are far more costly than paper filters.
 

91lxstangowner

Member
May 7, 2011
65
0
16
Aug 1, 2011
#3
  • Aug 1, 2011
  • #3
Thanks for the info. I just wanted to get a basic review of the filter like you gave me because I was thinking of buying one. I heard that it increases throttle response. Do you know if thats true?
 
D

Delray Dude

New Member
Jul 7, 2010
263
1
0
Aug 2, 2011
#4
  • Aug 2, 2011
  • #4
I would doubt it on throttle response - may feel that way on a replacement of any filter if the original was way dirty and clogged....much like just removing a filter and running without one would feel. You wouldn't notice a difference if the filter was good versus no filter. (obviously not recommended)
 

91lxstangowner

Member
May 7, 2011
65
0
16
Aug 2, 2011
#5
  • Aug 2, 2011
  • #5
Well I haven't checked my filter yet but I think that its about time to change it.
 
D

Delray Dude

New Member
Jul 7, 2010
263
1
0
Aug 2, 2011
#6
  • Aug 2, 2011
  • #6
thats always a good idea. one time when i checked/changed mine I found that one of those grocery plastic bags had made it in the box and was blocking a major amount of the air flow. needless to say the car run much better once removed. Still trying to figure out how it made it in there.
 

91lxstangowner

Member
May 7, 2011
65
0
16
Aug 2, 2011
#7
  • Aug 2, 2011
  • #7
Ok ill probably check really soon. Tomorrow I plan on paintimg the mirrors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New guy- first Stang- I love it !!
  • smid333
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
140
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
smid333
S
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
381
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
615
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:59 AM
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?