• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Kenne Bell question

  • Thread starter Thread starter RTRMustangGT
  • Start date Start date Nov 23, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

RTRMustangGT

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
43
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#1
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #1
What kind of boost pressure can you run on a 4.6 GT with 91 octane pump gas? Will you be able to run the 14psi kit on the 91 octane? If so what kind of horsepower can you get?
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#2
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #2
Uhh Kenne Bell states to run nothing lower than 92.

I'm sure you could get by & all but you'll have to back you timing down so low what's the point of even having a super charger then
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Nov 23, 2004
#3
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #3
RTRMustangGT said:
What kind of boost pressure can you run on a 4.6 GT with 91 octane pump gas? Will you be able to run the 14psi kit on the 91 octane? If so what kind of horsepower can you get?
Click to expand...


why worry about getting higher octane if your putting on a blower?
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#4
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #4
Because you have to feed that air otherwise your motor will spark knock & blow up the motor, you have to retard timing to prevent detonation aswell.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Nov 23, 2004
#5
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #5
Ray@VSK said:
Because you have to feed that air otherwise your motor will spark knock & blow up the motor, you have to retard timing to prevent detonation aswell.
Click to expand...

yeah i know that already. the question is for RTRMustangGT.

if KB recommends 93+ then don't put less in. simple.
 

back_in_black

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
460
1
0
frederick, MD
Nov 23, 2004
#6
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #6
I would not run over 9 lbs of boost with stock bottom end, intercooling will help.
 

lazerred02

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
190
1
0
FT Stewart, GA
Nov 23, 2004
#7
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #7
o3redfire said:
I would not run over 9 lbs of boost with stock bottom end, intercooling will help.
Click to expand...


I agree 100 %, just end up costing you more $ in the end.
 

MT1083

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
1,033
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Nov 23, 2004
#8
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #8
Ray@VSK said:
Uhh Kenne Bell states to run nothing lower than 92.
Click to expand...


KB's chips are set to run on 91 octane. If you have access to 93-94 then you may be able to run 10# safely. Ken told me that I would be able to, but the extra power is just not worth the risk of an engine in pieces.
 

Laser-01-gt

New Member
Jun 7, 2003
38
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#9
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #9
Yes, Kenne Bell kits are designed to run on 91. Every additional 1psi need 1.5 octane. So if the 9# intercooled kit is designed for 91 then it would take 100 octane race fuel for a 14# kit. on a stock bottom end with the stock compression.
 
S

Saleen s281

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2000
79
0
0
flushing new york usa
Nov 23, 2004
#10
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #10
Laser-01-gt said:
Yes, Kenne Bell kits are designed to run on 91. Every additional 1psi need 1.5 octane. So if the 9# intercooled kit is designed for 91 then it would take 100 octane race fuel for a 14# kit. on a stock bottom end with the stock compression.[/QUOTE

93 octane 14psi 488rwhp and 502 rwtq
Click to expand...
 
B

Blown00GTAuto

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
182
0
0
Washington DC
Nov 23, 2004
#11
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #11
Saleen s281 said:
...93 octane 14psi 488rwhp and 502 rwtq
Click to expand...

Are you seeing 14psi or is it that you are running a 14 psi pulley? With stage 3 heads, big cams, and headers you'd get substantially less actual boost pressure than with a stock long block running the same pulley. Your getting the same airflow as 14psi but with less actual (heat causing) boost pressure, so it's understandable that you can use 93 octane. I've never seen Kenne Bell claim to run 14psi on 93 octane or less on a stock longblock.

Nevertheless you've got yourself a nice setup .
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 23, 2004
#12
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #12
o3redfire said:
I would not run over 9 lbs of boost with stock bottom end, intercooling will help.
Click to expand...
I agree don't go over 8-9 psi. on a stock
bottom end or your engine is living on barrowed time! A intercooler or
aftercooler would help prevent detonation also! I think you will be find
with 91 octane too.
 
S

Saleen s281

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2000
79
0
0
flushing new york usa
Nov 23, 2004
#13
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #13
i see 14 psi. i thought i would see less too with the ported heads but for some reason i see 14
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Nov 23, 2004
#14
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #14
Heck even 9PSI KB units are killing the stock low end...I would NOT recommend putting a KB on a 2V with stock lowend....built is the only way to go with those IMO.Then you have a killer combo. EDIT: Saleen S281, your trap is kinda low for all that work...maybe it isnt, but it seems you should be well over 120 with all that power.Traction problems?
 

Venom_Nitrous

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2002
416
1
0
Spearfish, SD
Nov 23, 2004
#15
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #15
Hopefully I don't hijak this, but doesn't it kind of depend on where you live as to the octane requirement. I live kind of at a high elevation and premium here is only 1 point higher than the regular gas I buy at my parents place which is at alot lower elevation. Premium there is like 3-4 points higher.
 
S

Saleen s281

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2000
79
0
0
flushing new york usa
Nov 24, 2004
#16
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #16
i thought 117 was kinda low myself. theres no traction problem i got bfg drag radials. im not sure if im shifting to early or to late. i shift at 6100 rpm. if i post up my dyno sheet would you be able to find out where i should be shifting?
 

Ibeyorsuperman

Member
Apr 21, 2003
123
0
16
Ogden, Ut.
Nov 24, 2004
#17
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #17
I ran my GT with stock internals on 12psi on 91 octane.. the KB tune is pretty good
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Nov 24, 2004
#18
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #18
Ibeyorsuperman said:
I ran my GT with stock internals on 12psi on 91 octane.. the KB tune is pretty good
Click to expand...
Isn't that pushing the envelope? I run 10 psi full time with 93 octane. Just got the 11 psi pulley but will use it only at the track with 100 octane gas. I have a friend with a Vortech @ 14 psi on stock internals....my guess is that he is on borrowed time.
 

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Nov 25, 2004
#19
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #19
hotmustang331 said:
Heck even 9PSI KB units are killing the stock low end...I would NOT recommend putting a KB on a 2V with stock lowend
Click to expand...

What do you know ? Do you have one ? Go tell this to KB I'm sure they can confirm this
 
2

2000BLKGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2001
361
0
0
Toronto
Nov 25, 2004
#20
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #20
hotmustang331 said:
Heck even 9PSI KB units are killing the stock low end...I would NOT recommend putting a KB on a 2V with stock lowend....built is the only way to go with those IMO.
Click to expand...

I encourage you to sit down with Ken Christley at Kenne Bell.

You can state your beliefs and assumptions, and he'll give you the facts.

KB have been building blowers for nearly 30 years....there is no problem running their 6-9psi kits on stock internals. If there was, they wouldn't be selling them to car owners.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
121
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
30
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
651
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
84
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
865
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?