• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Kennebell

  • Thread starter Thread starter usaf_branham
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Aug 8, 2009
#21
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #21
Everything is installed and tuned with the exception of my guages. It pulled 357 RWHP, and 407 RWTQ... I was hoping for 400 rwhp and similar torque, but apparently, this blower is making 10 psi... so, big shot tuned my car with a very safe tune. Believe it or not, i like the 4.10's in this setup. As long as I dont stab the throttle it hooks pretty decently.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Aug 9, 2009
#22
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #22
usaf_branham said:
Everything is installed and tuned with the exception of my guages. It pulled 357 RWHP, and 407 RWTQ... I was hoping for 400 rwhp and similar torque, but apparently, this blower is making 10 psi... so, big shot tuned my car with a very safe tune. Believe it or not, i like the 4.10's in this setup. As long as I dont stab the throttle it hooks pretty decently.
Click to expand...

Great torque. Sounds like the tune is adding a lot of fuel or taking a lot of timing out to be safe. What's the air/fuel ratio?
 

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Aug 9, 2009
#23
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #23
11.7

13 degrees of spark i believe
 
R

rlhdude

New Member
Apr 21, 2008
4
0
0
Aug 11, 2009
#24
  • Aug 11, 2009
  • #24
Really?

First thank you for all the great feedback!

Wow only 357 RWHP? I was looking to go this route as well after driving a cobra. I have a 01 GT Vert. Kenne Bell with 9psi is suppose to be in the 400+ range which would be higher than a cobra. Are the HP ratings listed on the Kenne Bell site not accurate? Damn I want to beat the cobra with this kit.

RLH
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 11, 2009
#25
  • Aug 11, 2009
  • #25
rlhdude said:
Are the HP ratings listed on the Kenne Bell site not accurate?
Click to expand...
Oh no...they're dead on assuming you don't mind making ragged edge A/F ratio's, a steady diet of 100+ octane fuel and 23* of timing a regular occurance.

So to answer your question....no, their stats aren't accurate. At least not for your average user running 91-Octane and reasonable timing and A/F ratio's. Either plan on pulleying it for more boost, or look into a charger that'll make that kind of power right out of the box.

I don't mean to derail the thread here, but I have yet to see a Tork Tech Inc. kit make less than 387rwhp at their advertised 8psi (usually 390-405hp through a stick shift). And that number was on a car running it through an automatic transmission. Upgrade the fuel system, swap the pulley and make sure you've got a short block that'll hold up to the power and 500-550+hp isn't hard to reach.

...did I mention they were about $500 cheaper than the Kenne Bell kit as well?

Just throwing it out there....do what you will with it.
 

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Aug 11, 2009
#26
  • Aug 11, 2009
  • #26
Gearbanger 101 said:
Oh no...they're dead on assuming you don't mind making ragged edge A/F ratio's, a steady diet of 100+ octane fuel and 23* of timing a regular occurance.

So to answer your question....no, their stats aren't accurate. At least not for your average user running 91-Octane and reasonable timing and A/F ratio's. Either plan on pulleying it for more boost, or look into a charger that'll make that kind of power right out of the box.

I don't mean to derail the thread here, but I have yet to see a Tork Tech Inc. kit make less than 387rwhp at their advertised 8psi (usually 390-405hp through a stick shift). And that number was on a car running it through an automatic transmission. Upgrade the fuel system, swap the pulley and make sure you've got a short block that'll hold up to the power and 500-550+hp isn't hard to reach.

...did I mention they were about $500 cheaper than the Kenne Bell kit as well?

Just throwing it out there....do what you will with it.
Click to expand...

Don't forget buying the new hood that you have to with the Tork Tech kit. Just so he knows that that is also an expense (there goes the $500 difference). I guess they also have the extended hood scoop that you can use to keep the stock hood. Looks like a great kit and it comes with an 8-rib setup standard. Definitely something to look into.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 11, 2009
#27
  • Aug 11, 2009
  • #27
ScortLX said:
Don't forget buying the new hood that you have to with the Tork Tech kit. Just so he knows that that is also an expense (there goes the $500 difference). I guess they also have the extended hood scoop that you can use to keep the stock hood. Looks like a great kit and it comes with an 8-rib setup standard. Definitely something to look into.
Click to expand...

This is indeed true...the extended hood scoop ($200), or aftermarket hood will need to be purchased to clear the blower with the Tork Tech....but beyond that, you've got everything you need to run between 390 and 500 horsepower on pump gas.

If you want to get anywhere close to the 500hp mark with the 2.1L Kenne Bell, be prepared to shell out the money for an injector upgrade, fuel pump upgrade, 8-rib pulley upgrade, big tube intake and 90MM mass air option and 75mm Throttle body.

The cost of those pieces alone are going to kill ya on the big end, where they're all included as standard equipment with the Tork Tech.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Aug 12, 2009
#28
  • Aug 12, 2009
  • #28
My Tork Tech kit is making 417rwhp(my car 5 spd) and I'm loving every min of it
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Aug 12, 2009
#29
  • Aug 12, 2009
  • #29
I'm the guy Gearbanger is referring to who made only 387 rwhp on my Tork Tech setup. However, as I explained in the relevant thread, that number is suspect for a number of reasons. I do not doubt that my car is making right around 400 rwhp and 400 rwtq now, but I haven't gotten a chance to re-dyno it. When I do, I'll be sure to post up the results.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Aug 12, 2009
#30
  • Aug 12, 2009
  • #30
387 out of an auto vs 417 out of a manual equates to only being 7rwhp down at the crank - that could be temperature, altitude, ect. No reason to worry
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Aug 12, 2009
#31
  • Aug 12, 2009
  • #31
it's just a shame Tork Tech isn't interested in getting a CARB number for any of their kits
 
R

rlhdude

New Member
Apr 21, 2008
4
0
0
Aug 13, 2009
#32
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #32
Tork Tech sounds good however I really do not want to modify my hood. I want my car to be a sleeper.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 13, 2009
#33
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #33
That's fine and all, but I hardly think a hood scoop extended all of an inch and a half, that was modeled after the stock one is going to give away the farm.

You tell me....if it weren't for the whine of the blower and the obvious acceleration, would you thing there was anything going on underneath the hood of this car?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_qRUj0RRDU&feature=player_embedded

Still looks plenty "sleeperesqe" to me?
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 13, 2009
#34
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #34
Gearbanger - does the Tork Tech kit work with NPI heads?
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Aug 13, 2009
#35
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #35
CobraRed_96_GT said:
387 out of an auto vs 417 out of a manual equates to only being 7rwhp down at the crank - that could be temperature, altitude, ect. No reason to worry
Click to expand...

You're right, but there were issues with the dyno session. For one, my car only made about 350 rwtq due to an incorrect closed-loop to open-loop delay (AFR was at 16:1 at the torque peak ), and the dyno itself seemed to be having issues (it was a Mustang-style loadholding dyno and the pump that provides the rolling resistance was not functioning correctly, which caused an erratic "curve" at the top of the pull in 3rd).
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Aug 13, 2009
#36
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #36
my full bolt on GT with a KB 1.7L @ 9 PSI put down 428rwhp/433rwtq. It was fun, but still wasn't enough against most terminators and modded LS1s. Trying to line your 400whp car to an 03 Cobra won't be pretty most of the time, considering most terminators are not stock. My recommendation is if you're set on a KB, try to find a used 2.2L or 2.6H before pulling the trigger on a new 2.1L kit.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 13, 2009
#37
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #37
stangGT97 said:
Gearbanger - does the Tork Tech kit work with NPI heads?
Click to expand...

As far as I know...yes. Although it may require the later model timing cover...I'm really not 100% There are a few T-Brid/Cougar guys over on TCCOA.com running them with NPI heads. From what they advertise, it'll work with an Mustang, T-Bird/Cougar, Crown Vic/Marquis.
02LaserRed2V said:
My recommendation is if you're set on a KB, try to find a used 2.2L or 2.6H before pulling the trigger on a new 2.1L kit.
Click to expand...

I'm wondering....do you think KB will still sell the old 2.2L Autorotor as a kit if requested. I've noticed a lot of guys still prefer them to the current 2.6L. The new line of blowers is just too damn quiet. Nothing screamed like the old 2.2L.

I'd buy one over even a 2.8LH just for the noise factor alone.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
104
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
B
Airaid reduction sleeve?
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
136
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
BriansNSane
B
R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
52
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
225
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
809
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 2:39 PM
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?