• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Logical decisions...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rook79
  • Start date Start date Jan 21, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

(&)

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2002
140
0
0
Kansas
Jan 21, 2004
#21
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #21
2kflamedlude said:
LMAO.. Autocross god.. Right.
Click to expand...

Spoken like someone who's never been to an autocross. They run circles around Mustangs.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Jan 21, 2004
#22
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #22
A lot of this criticism of the Neon is besides the point. I don't know how anyone can compare a RWD v8 to FWD four banger. I think the SRT-4 would compare pretty well against some of the other FWD four banger offerings in its price range, except maybe in the depriation and long-term durability departments, where it's probably a bit iffy--for this reason I'd look into leasing one. DC deserves some credit for walking into the rice scene and giving everyone a spanking. But if it was me I wouldn't do anything until I got to see/drive the 05 Stang, and until I knew whether there was any truth to this sub $20k V8 rumor. I don't see what the rush is with some of you folks driving practically new cars (and by this I mean less than ten years old ). And keep in mind that for $20k you can get late 90s M3s and 540is--both have RWD and plenty of hp. And as for the SN95, the Mach 1, Bullitt, Cobra and 94/95 5.0s are about to become an instant classics.
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#23
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #23
66Satellite said:
A lot of this criticism of the Neon is besides the point. I don't know how anyone can compare a RWD v8 to FWD four banger. I think the SRT-4 would compare pretty well against some of the other FWD four banger offerings in its price range, except maybe in the depriation and long-term durability departments, where it's probably a bit iffy--for this reason I'd look into leasing one. DC deserves some credit for walking into the rice scene and giving everyone a spanking. But if it was me I wouldn't do anything until I got to see/drive the 05 Stang, and until I knew whether there was any truth to this sub $20k V8 rumor. I don't see what the rush is with some of you folks driving practically new cars (and by this I mean less than ten years old ). And keep in mind that for $20k you can get late 90s M3s and 540is--both have RWD and plenty of hp. And as for the SN95, the Mach 1, Bullitt, Cobra and 94/95 5.0s are about to become an instant classics.
Click to expand...
They compare them because of the 1/4 times and that's it. For most that's all they really care about. The cars outside of straight line performance would be hard pressed to be any further away from each other on the spectrum. The Mustang a sporty coupe,long time heritage, RWD, V8 and everybody who sees one knows what the hell it is and most like it. The SRT-4 a hoped up 4 door sedan,here today gone tomorrow in the long term of the car world, FWD turbo I4, and most people would look at it and say....what the hell is that?

And jadesville I hadn't heard anything about head gasket failures. Link?
 
R

Rook79

New Member
Jul 11, 2003
29
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#24
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #24
They compare them because of the 1/4 times and that's it. For most that's all they really care about.
Click to expand...

Actually, you can't compare these cars. Mustang is a great vehicle, and like I said in my original post, I'd love to own one. SRT-4 is a 4banger...and a neon...and it does the cones faster than a WRX. Either of those two would outrun a Mustang in anything other than the 1/4 and the SRT-4 will take current GTs in that too. New '05 GTs will outrun it...for another 8k.

Thanks for everybodies replies...hasn't helped much though...lol. I'm still stuck wondering. I think I'm just going to wait for the '05 stang to come out and drive both. That's the only way to know...
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 21, 2004
#25
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #25
I guess it breaks down into what you want. If you like the large spoiler for downforce on the wrong axle look. Then the neon is the way to go. If you like fwd then the neon is the way to go. If you like the sound of a bumblebee or a V8 rumble. Then the neon is definately for you. It all depends on what you are into. If you want to be in the sport compact scene. Then get a neon.
 
2

2kflamedlude

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
353
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#26
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #26
(&) said:
Spoken like someone who's never been to an autocross. They run circles around Mustangs.
Click to expand...
See my screen name. I have fully built auto cross car.. FULL COILOVER SYSTEM and I dont have any problems with srt 4 on the road coarse
 

fly2low

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
236
0
0
Marina del Rey, CA
Jan 21, 2004
#27
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #27
Drive the cars, check your financial capabilities, check the insurance. Buy what you like. Do you really want unknown people on the internet to make the decision for you?
 

(&)

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2002
140
0
0
Kansas
Jan 21, 2004
#28
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #28
2kflamedlude said:
See my screen name. I have fully built auto cross car.. FULL COILOVER SYSTEM and I dont have any problems with srt 4 on the road coarse
Click to expand...

A prelude...that's pretty cool. Do the flames make it faster? How do you think you'd do stock vs. stock? I'll give you a hint...in terms of autox cars, the Neon is the FWD version of the Miata.

And just so we don't get too far away from the point...the point is, people are going to cross shop the SRT-4 with the Mustang. They are both quick cars, and can both handle pretty well. But the Neon is (at least right now) more of a driver's car, despite being FWD. And it's cheaper than a GT.
 
2

2kflamedlude

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
353
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#29
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #29
(&) said:
A prelude...that's pretty cool. Do the flames make it faster? How do you think you'd do stock vs. stock? I'll give you a hint...in terms of autox cars, the Neon is the FWD version of the Miata.

And just so we don't get too far away from the point...the point is, people are going to cross shop the SRT-4 with the Mustang. They are both quick cars, and can both handle pretty well. But the Neon is (at least right now) more of a driver's car, despite being FWD. And it's cheaper than a GT.
Click to expand...
Hmm I assure I will kill any neons at a road course.. Ever heard of the integra Type R? Prelude was the original R and trust me its not stock this is one of my toyes
 
R

Rook79

New Member
Jul 11, 2003
29
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#30
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #30
Ok...so you are saying you not only improved the handling of your prelude immensly, but you also added well over 100hp to the ground to get it to even keep up with the neon.

...If you put that much money into a prelude you are obviously bored and make way to much. This thread is useless now without pictures and dyno stats.

I totally agree...the point is that it is a decision to make, and will be for anybody that would consider driving anything other than a pony.
 

65conv50

New Member
Jan 8, 2003
290
0
0
Greenville, South Carolina
Jan 22, 2004
#31
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #31
For GOODNESS sakes, don't get the Neon. Pure junque!!! For the bux, in a front drive, the Mini is the only way to go. I won one for a weekend when they were doing the intros and took it to the Tennessee mountains. WOW!! I have seen no FWD that comes even close. Plus it has classic good looks and BMW quality, which means you won't be spending any bux on repairs.
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
Jan 22, 2004
#32
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #32
Well once again we are into an apples and oranges argument. I am a huge fan of the 05 stang. I really think Ford has a hit ontheir hands, and so does everyone I know. We are all excited to see them. I plan on buying one as long as something disatrous doesnt happen between then and now. For what it is the SRT4 is a great car. Compact, quick, fun to drive. It falls into the same group car as all the other 4 cyl cars out there. My friends have hooked up Cavaliers( the new 2.2 is suprising ), Integras, Preludes, yada yada yada. They are quick, and can be made to look really cool ( but not often ). I dont hate on em, but I am no fan. For one, they are cramped, cramped, cramped. Vibration. Noise. And I cant stang the high rpm surge personally. Its like nothing...nothing....and then the engine is screaming for dear life...and youre not moving ( ok ok sometimes they are ). I currently drive a 97 Cougar with the 4.6, and I am a converted chevy guy. After riding in my car my friend was like damn, i never knew how loud my engine was. I have ridden in Mustangs and they are much quiter as well than ricers. Not to mention roomier, and are built better in general. I personally like a bigger car that I can accelerate smoothly with, and not feel like my engine is abotu to go up in smoke. I looked at an 04 Stang last month. With rebate, and my trade in I had the price down to 19K, maybe lower if I had haggled. But I saw the 05 and have decided to wait. I may get a 99 Stang to build up though. Not to mention the Mach 1 is incredible. If you want REAL power the Stang is your bet. if you want a cheap and fun car get the neon.
 

GelatiCruiser

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
1,054
0
0
1 Mile South of Somewhere.
Jan 22, 2004
#33
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #33
fly2low said:
Drive the cars, check your financial capabilities, check the insurance. Buy what you like. Do you really want unknown people on the internet to make the decision for you?
Click to expand...

Amen!!! A-Fuggin'-Men!!!
 
2

2kflamedlude

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
353
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#34
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #34
Rook79 said:
Ok...so you are saying you not only improved the handling of your prelude immensly, but you also added well over 100hp to the ground to get it to even keep up with the neon.

...If you put that much money into a prelude you are obviously bored and make way to much. This thread is useless now without pictures and dyno stats.

I totally agree...the point is that it is a decision to make, and will be for anybody that would consider driving anything other than a pony.
Click to expand...
Yes I make good money and yes I spent tons on this lude.. Personally Stang is way better than any Neon, yes SRT 4 is cool out of the box but for me I dont have problems running up against them. On road course I will hand alot of people their asses. But as far as Neon vs stangs

Stang > Neon.
 
R

Ron Jeremy

New Member
Nov 13, 2003
747
1
0
Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
Jan 22, 2004
#35
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #35
Stang Stan Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang

Get the Stang. Forget the Neon.
 
R

Rook79

New Member
Jul 11, 2003
29
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#36
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #36
2kflamedlude said:
Yes I make good money and yes I spent tons on this lude..
Click to expand...

I think you are to young...well, at least to immature to make good money, and I think you are lying...just my opinion. It has been said.

Stang > Neon.
Click to expand...

I don't think a single person including myself on this thread has disagreed with that.

Thanks to everybody for their replies, it has given me alot to think about. I'm just take the best advice I read: Wait a bit, drive them, check finances, and go with my gut instinct after that.
 

GelatiCruiser

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
1,054
0
0
1 Mile South of Somewhere.
Jan 22, 2004
#37
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #37
Ron Jeremy said:
Stang Stan Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang Stang

Get the Stang. Forget the Neon.
Click to expand...

I think there's a hidden message in there somewhere.........
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#38
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #38
GelatiCruiser said:
I think there's a hidden message in there somewhere.........
Click to expand...

Tang?
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Jan 22, 2004
#39
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #39
Omegalock said:
Tang?
Click to expand...

No, play it backwards. It's gnats.
 
2

2kflamedlude

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
353
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#40
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #40
Rook79 said:
I think you are to young...well, at least to immature to make good money, and I think you are lying...just my opinion. It has been said.



I don't think a single person including myself on this thread has disagreed with that.

Thanks to everybody for their replies, it has given me alot to think about. I'm just take the best advice I read: Wait a bit, drive them, check finances, and go with my gut instinct after that.
Click to expand...

I dont think being 31 and having built a road race car is immature.. Point is SRT is not a road race GOD.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
766
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Old School 5.0 Very cool stuff from the early days of the movement
  • DAJ352
  • Jun 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2019
DAJ352
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?