• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

long tube headers or performer manifold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter homerojr
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2005
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Jul 13, 2005
#1
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #1
I´m about to install my AFR165, and together with my existing combo, what would bring more benefits in terms of hp, torque and SOTP, a LT exhaust or a performer intake (considering I got a cobra manifold slightly polished and ported, a XE270HR cam and MAC unequal p-headers, see signature for other mods). I can´t afford the two mods right now.
Any suggestion is welcomed!
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jul 13, 2005
#2
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #2
homerojr said:
I´m about to install my AFR165, and together with my existing combo, what would bring more benefits in terms of hp, torque and SOTP, a LT exhaust or a performer intake (considering I got a cobra manifold slightly polished and ported, a XE270HR cam and MAC unequal p-headers, see signature for other mods). I can´t afford the two mods right now.
Any suggestion is welcomed!
Click to expand...

With your setup there is NO advantage of a Performer intake over a ported Cobra.

My Vote Is "Long Tubes"
RC
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Jul 13, 2005
#3
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #3
I'd say long tubes to, especially since you are replacing the heads and already would have removed the old headers. See, I try to be efficient. The Cobra intake is good for now. Plus if you do decide to replace the intake in the future it would be easier than replacing the headers. Just One Man's Opinion. Peace
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jul 13, 2005
#4
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #4
Im saying to go w/ the Intake. If you put equal or shorty headers on your AFR's it will still be a good power increase. If you dont do the intake are you saying that the stock intake will be going back on? IMO aftermaket heads + Aftermarket Intake + shorty headers will give you more of a performance gain then Aftermaket heads + stock Intake and LT's
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 13, 2005
#5
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #5
You do know that you need a different mid pipe for those lt's...right?

I assume your going for the 300 or better goal so .........................
your gonna want a better exhaust & intake anyway.

I'd do the lt's mid pipe and AFR's all at the same time as the lt's just fall into place when you got your motor in a heads off condition.

My best advice is to be patient and do the heads, lt's, midpipe, and cam all at the same time.

When you got the heads off it takes just a little more work to throw a cam in there.

Later
Grady
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Jul 13, 2005
#6
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #6
There will be no benifit bolting up a performer. GT-40/Cobra intakes have been proven to put down great numbers, especially when ported. The performer might shift your peak a bit, but it won't gain you anything.

If you don't need to pass smog (It would be a pita swapping in and out LT's to pass) I would go with 'em. Obviously you will need a new mid-pipe also.
 

FastFord

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
380
0
0
Washington
Jul 13, 2005
#7
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #7
final5-0 said:
My best advice is to be patient and do the heads, lt's, midpipe, and cam all at the same time.

When you got the heads off it takes just a little more work to throw a cam in there.
Click to expand...


Agreed!!
 
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Jul 13, 2005
#8
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #8
Thanks for your opinions . I was afraid maybe the AFRs could provide much more than my Cobra intake could handle, becoming the "bottleneck" of the setup, so I decidedly would go the performer route at once (or even the performer rpm). The cam won´t be changed (it´s the XE270, and I´m satisfied with its profile, and considering lift, duration, lsa, rev capacity, I guess I can make good use of my new heads. I´m also aware of the shorty mid-pipe. Could I expect some noticeable torque increase at low end with the LTs? And at top end? Does the different designs between BBK and MAC (my primary choices) mean different performances?
Thanks again for sharing your knowledge.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jul 13, 2005
#9
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #9
Striped5.0 said:
IMO aftermaket heads + Aftermarket Intake + shorty headers will give you more of a performance gain then Aftermaket heads + stock Intake and LT's
Click to expand...


He has a ported Cobra intake!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 13, 2005
#10
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #10
homerojr said:
Thanks for your opinions . I was afraid maybe the AFRs could provide much more than my Cobra intake could handle, becoming the "bottleneck" of the setup, so I decidedly would go the performer route at once (or even the performer rpm). The cam won´t be changed (it´s the XE270, and I´m satisfied with its profile, and considering lift, duration, lsa, rev capacity, I guess I can make good use of my new heads. I´m also aware of the shorty mid-pipe. Could I expect some noticeable torque increase at low end with the LTs? And at top end? Does the different designs between BBK and MAC (my primary choices) mean different performances?
Thanks again for sharing your knowledge.
Click to expand...

You can expect a better gain at low to mid range from the lt's over shortys. At the top end they are much closer to each other.

BBK or MAC will be about the same from a performance point of view.

If you go with the Hooker or one of the other lt's that have a true collector that does not neck down to the ball & socket style of collector like MAC & BBK, some folks say you can pick up some more power.

Later
Grady
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jul 13, 2005
#11
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #11
yeah running hookers would be sweet if you could afford them.

macs do the trick

i would go long tubes

how much power do you make?
because i dont see you gaining very much power at all with the afr 165s over the ported gt40Ps with that cam. thats pretty much my combo and i dont have ported and polished P heads. I just have bowl blending and no egr bumps

another afr 165 car with the xe 270 made 304/327

a car with my setup with a cobra intake made 302/327 with the same cam and port matching the runners to a 1250


i know this is weird but i suggest you save all your money and just get your current setup straight

tune it, get long tubes and put the rest of the money into something else, Nitrous

find a used vortech

sure there is a weight difference with iron and aluminum... maybe get a k member
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jul 13, 2005
#12
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #12
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...ategory=33741&item=7985765476&sspagename=WDVW
 
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Jul 13, 2005
#13
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #13
Hehehe, thanks for your support, snoozer, I´ve seen the ad. By my 2 years of experience with my p heads, I can assure they´re a great bang for the buck. Nevertheless,everybody praises the AFRs, including independent testers and test mags and as Elvis said "50 million fans can´t be wrong"... I gotta check for myself.... Hookers are out of reach...and yes, MACs may do the trick.. I have my catbacks and headers for over three years and they´re ok, no rust, the tail pipes still beautifully chromed. My BBK h-pipe, needed a lot of work to fit, though
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jul 14, 2005
#14
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #14
swappin heads for 10 hp...

well good luck
 
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Aug 8, 2005
#15
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #15
Sorry to disagree, but I guess it´s a little bit more than 10hp... (at least the potential is there, all is in the combo and tuning)). After I did take a look at my brand new AFR´s, there´s simply no comparison, when you realize the engineering involved in there; the intake ports are huge all the way to the valves (and all are equal, thanks to 5 axis 100% CNC), and so the exhaust ports. The intake and exhaust ports has some "elevation" going to the valves sticks, so the flow is directed not to create turbulence. The curves to the valve seats are gentle and smooth to the touch. As a bonus, man they´re feather weight compared to irons!! Wait, there´s more! In case you want to work it (slight cleaning of inner surfaces and cc, due to the concentric lines originated by the CNC process, I bet some more hidden cfm flow will still show up (we are talking over 240 cfm intake at just 0.500 lift). I´ll try to post some good pics to illustrate what I´m talking about.
By the way, I´ll do some more port work on my lower Cobra intake, as well as gasket match and port match, and will follow the long tubes route.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Need Help With Engine Swap
  • Jeff Culp
  • Aug 18, 2013
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 18, 2013
Jeff Culp
J
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
R
Long Tube Question
  • Rooster1969
  • Jan 28, 2011
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
3
Views
942
SVT Tech Forum Jan 29, 2011
Rooster1969
R
A
  • Locked
Expired 812rwhp 92 Ford Mustang GT, 347cid, D1R Procharger, Tremec 6spd. 15k obo
  • AJ1320
  • Jan 14, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
14K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jan 14, 2013
AJ1320
A
S
HIPO manifolds VS Long Tube Headers 289 65 mustang
  • synthartist69
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
9
Views
8K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 11, 2009
JonK
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?