• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Long tube ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2002tbstang
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2007
2

2002tbstang

New Member
Jan 7, 2007
26
0
1
Pebble Beach
Oct 30, 2007
#1
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #1
I have searched on this and am pretty much set on getting SLP longtubes becasue i have the slp mid pipe already. butwas wondering If there are any issues with the longtubes getting in the way of other stuff Or if their are any clearance issues that could be a problem oce they are in. People with SLP longtubes please let me know what you think of them
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Oct 31, 2007
#2
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #2
Yes, they are the biggest pain in the a$$ to do anything else to the car. The HP gain is not worth the money. Clutch jobs are nightmares, because they have to come back off. Even doing motor mounts is a joke.

I would leave your stock ones and use the money to save up and buy a blower. If you are set on doing headers I suggest mid lengths since you can get the trans out without removing them.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 31, 2007
#3
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #3
Some Longtubes do allow for a trans to be removed without touching the header. Midlengths are just as much a pita to install as LT's and may offer slightly less hp gains.
 
2

2002tbstang

New Member
Jan 7, 2007
26
0
1
Pebble Beach
Nov 3, 2007
#4
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #4
I want to stay NA for now because of reliability issues and Im just starting college. What would be better to do because I am in California (another reason against longtubes) I would like to do either VT stg 1 cams and shortys because I can get a really good deal on the shortys and install or Just do longtubes and stay at that for now. What do you guys think?
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Nov 3, 2007
#5
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #5
Shorty's are a waste of money and time. Just do LT's
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 3, 2007
#6
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #6
I gained nothing with SVO shorties on my ported headswap 98, dont bother with them. Anderson Motorsports made 320something with the mid length headers, but it was also on a built 2v with race ported PI's and cams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Engine (EGR Deleted) Solution the hotter combustion chambers?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
PonyGTrider
0
Engine Multiple o2 sensor codes, car runs terrible
  • 02newedge
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
537
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
F
Car dies on bumps and when braking
  • Feckl
  • Jul 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
177
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
Engine 1986 GT Overheating issues
  • 86 5O GT
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
677
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2026
86 5O GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?