• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Looking for 325 rwhp. Help!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1bad04GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

1bad04GT

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
174
0
0
Lubbock, Texas
Jan 31, 2007
#21
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #21
thanks guys, i definitely want to stay N/A. is there any way i could stick with the e cam and the shorties? they set me back a good bit and from everything ive read its a good cam and they are good headers...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 31, 2007
#22
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #22
1bad04GT said:
thanks guys, i definitely want to stay N/A. is there any way i could stick with the e cam and the shorties? they set me back a good bit and from everything ive read its a good cam and they are good headers...
Click to expand...

Take it from a fellow Texan

If your focus is on peak values from a dyno pull
then
The shorties are not gonna hurt you

There is not a lot of difference between them & LT's up top

I have seen a "few" e-cams go to or close to 300

Grady
 

brian15

New Member
Oct 16, 2003
81
0
0
Feb 1, 2007
#23
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #23
my best firends sn-95 has been 12.90's n/a

stock heads
stock cam
gt40 intake
1.6 roller rockers

all the other little bolt ons through a t-5 .

on et streets and prostarts ....the thing just flat out moves ..... has since move on to some bigger parts
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 1, 2007
#24
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #24
The custom cam (crucial for power/streetability) matched to some well flowing heads and intake is key.

A Performer intake is plenty, hardly small. Unfortunatly many think you need "big" intakes to make "big" power. A quick check of cfm ratings shows you otherwise.

AFR 165's or AFR 185's.

Custom cam with known goals to hit 325rwhp (peak). The average powerband is probably more benefcial from 3,000 rpm and up. You may get to see past 6,000rpm before it is all said and done.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Feb 1, 2007
#25
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #25
5spd GT said:
A Performer intake is plenty, hardly small. Unfortunatly many think you need "big" intakes to make "big" power. A quick check of cfm ratings shows you otherwise.
Click to expand...

You trying to pick a fight there fella?

I think a ported Performer would be enough.

In my eyes, the three most critical things are:

1. Heads
2. Custom cam (Ed C cars tend to perform exceptionally)
3. Custom tune.

If you told a custom grinder thats your goal, he can make it happen. You have to pay to play. 325 for an Ed C grind as per his website.

An e-cam is not a good cam for our cars. First off the technology is 25 years old, second off its a bear to tune.

Adam
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Feb 1, 2007
#26
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #26
Black95GTS said:
You trying to pick a fight there fella?

I think a ported Performer would be enough.

In my eyes, the three most critical things are:

1. Heads
2. Custom cam (Ed C cars tend to perform exceptionally)
3. Custom tune.

If you told a custom grinder thats your goal, he can make it happen. You have to pay to play. 325 for an Ed C grind as per his website.

An e-cam is not a good cam for our cars. First off the technology is 25 years old, second off its a bear to tune.

Adam
Click to expand...
ed cams are still half price of the modular 2V off the shelf cams
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Feb 1, 2007
#27
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #27
Black95GTS said:
An e-cam is not a good cam for our cars. First off the technology is 25 years old, second off its a bear to tune.

Adam
Click to expand...


just wondering. are you speaking from experience? i have the cam and my car is untuned and dont see why people always say bad things about it. it seems most have never used the cam but yet they like to comment on how bad it is for our cars.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Feb 1, 2007
#28
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #28
^ Exactly. I haven't had any problems with my e-cam either. I've never tried to tune it, but as far as # wise, I'm a tenth short from hitting the 12s with gt40 heads and explorer intake and long tubes, not to mention is a convertible.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Feb 1, 2007
#29
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #29
legalize420 said:
just wondering. are you speaking from experience? i have the cam and my car is untuned and dont see why people always say bad things about it. it seems most have never used the cam but yet they like to comment on how bad it is for our cars.
Click to expand...

No I don't have an E-cam. I never will have one. The only alphabet cam I may ever have (and I can't believe I'm even admitting this but damnit the results speak for themselves) is an F cam if I ever use forced induction.

Search around and there are more negatives then positives... I firmly believe that you can do a lot better with a split lift, split duration custom grind tailored to your exact combination by a professional with decades of industry experience.

If you really want to hit 325 rwhp, I highly highly doubt you're going to do it with an e-cam. If you want to prove me wrong that would be fine with me, but you asked for advice and thats what you got. Like anything else, you get what you pay for and what I said didn't cost you a thing.

If you were looking to upgrade your computer, would you buy a microchip from 1995 or one from 2007? Even though the chip from 95 is proven to work, the performance from the modern version will be that much better.

Adam
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 1, 2007
#30
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #30
Mechanically there is nothing wrong with an e-cam or another off the shelf cam. They are cams that have been used by thousands of enthusiasts without problems.

Does it provide maximum performance and driveability? Of course not. But how many really do?

You have to pay to play. Some would rather "play" with the extra money they save...

With an inferior cam (in most minds) like a few of those alphabet cams, doesn't mean that you are 'stupid' or 'ignorant' or are 'wanting to go slow.' It may be just what the enthusiast asked for or wants out of their budget and goal. Noone should look down upon a combo with wreckless abandon because they have 10-15rwhp less than one that spent more to get that.

Black95GTS - Nope, I actually wasn't...just saying "bigger isn't better"...you know how I do
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Feb 1, 2007
#31
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #31
Black95GTS said:
Search around and there are more negatives then positives...
Click to expand...


how many of those people have experience with the cam
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 1, 2007
#32
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #32
Black95GTS said:
If you were looking to upgrade your computer, would you buy a microchip from 1995 or one from 2007? Even though the chip from 95 is proven to work, the performance from the modern version will be that much better.
Adam
Click to expand...
this logic would seem to imply that a 4.6 mod motor is better than our 5.0 pushrod, after all it is newer technology
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 1, 2007
#33
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #33
It is my opinion that a 4.6L is better than the 5.0L pushrod.

Just right now at this point the market, it is more expensive the vastness of aftermarket parts and connections are not there, but growing quickly.

The 4.6L is working with less cubes, and making the same power with aftermarket h/c/i, sometimes more.

Compare a 331 and 302 (.4 cubic inch engine difference) and see how many 302's are making more power than a 331 assembled with the same principle. Hard to find eh?

Legalize20 - Good Point! I.E - You get a dozen roses for your girlfriend's birthday, but your friend get's his girlfriend a weekend on an expensive yacht. Which one is better? Answer: It depends on the person's finances in what he can afford and his goals
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Feb 2, 2007
#34
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #34
BlackVert said:
this logic would seem to imply that a 4.6 mod motor is better than our 5.0 pushrod, after all it is newer technology
Click to expand...

The 4.6 liter engine is better then the 5.0.

But you have to pay to play! It's more expensive to mod, but it is a better engine.

32V DOHC 4.6 > 5.0.

Adam
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Feb 2, 2007
#35
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #35
If you guys want to have the best, why not go buy a 4.6? So once the market creates more 4.6 parts, you'll buy a 96 mustang? That hurts! You guys SUCK! lol
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 2, 2007
#36
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #36
Again the reason why we don't buy them is because they are more expensive, pretty common sense Especially for college kids like myself
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 2, 2007
#37
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #37
i had one. i had a 2v. i did not like it; so much so that i sold it and bought a 5.0. now i have a 6.8. if i have the 4.6 still, i'd maybe be hoping for a 5.4, and somehow i don't think i'd be looking for 450hp n/a from it.

to each his own.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Feb 3, 2007
#38
  • Feb 3, 2007
  • #38
BlackVert said:
now i have a 6.8.
Click to expand...

For some reason that made me spit out coffee..... I thought you were attempting the Triton V10 thing that I was reading up on not too long ago
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 3, 2007
#39
  • Feb 3, 2007
  • #39
maybe i should scrap the 410 and go with a triton v10!

but seriously, if i did the math correctly, 410CI is 6.8L
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 3, 2007
#40
  • Feb 3, 2007
  • #40
BlackVert said:
maybe i should scrap the 410 and go with a triton v10!

but seriously, if i did the math correctly, 410CI is 6.8L
Click to expand...

6.8L ... that sounds like some of that Fast and Furious speak

When they ask ... just tell em .....

Its a Bad Boy Stroked Windsor

Let em wonder ... how big

Grady
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
Help with my 89 302 turbo tune
  • lunetick
  • Jun 23, 2019
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
10
Views
4K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Aug 9, 2019
Decipha
W
1994 Steeda Mustang GT woes and pains! in need of help!
  • Warshark
  • Jun 8, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 11, 2018
Warshark
W
Fox Kandi: she's cheap, fun, & has a loose top - sold!
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
112
Views
20K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2019
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?