• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Looking for 4.6L Mustang vs C6 Z06 Video

  • Thread starter Thread starter LostInLoveLV
  • Start date Start date Jul 25, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
B

BLUE03GT

New Member
Jul 13, 2003
281
0
0
43
Sunnyvale, Ca.
Jul 31, 2006
#81
  • Jul 31, 2006
  • #81
like is said before the Ford GT stock has run 11.2's at over 133mph... show me a ZO6 stock running LOW 11's @ over 130mph.... please id love to see it...
 

akb93

New Member
Jul 21, 2006
0
0
0
33
Regina
Jul 31, 2006
#82
  • Jul 31, 2006
  • #82
BLUE03GT said:
like is said before the Ford GT stock has run 11.2's at over 133mph... show me a ZO6 stock running LOW 11's @ over 130mph.... please id love to see it...
Click to expand...

Maybe not A Z06 but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
 

akb93

New Member
Jul 21, 2006
0
0
0
33
Regina
Jul 31, 2006
#83
  • Jul 31, 2006
  • #83
It also has to do with the driver and if you grip when you first accelerate
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 31, 2006
#84
  • Jul 31, 2006
  • #84
akb93 said:
Maybe not A Z06 but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
Click to expand...
We're talking Ford GT....not Mustang GT. And no....a C6 Z06 will not waste a Ford GT. You want proof, check out every head to head comparison ever done between the two.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 31, 2006
#85
  • Jul 31, 2006
  • #85
akb93 said:
Maybe not A Z06 but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
Click to expand...


ya might wanna go look around.. stock for stock the GT eats the Z06 for lunch. but for 70,000 more I would expect no less.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
49
Maryland
Aug 1, 2006
#86
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #86
akb93 said:
but a stock C6 Z06 would waste a stock GT, if it can't waste a GT I wan't proof
Click to expand...

*caution this is dangerous*

http://videos.streetfire.net/recentvideos/0/98c0da59-d89b-461e-aade-98100002e605.htm

Seems pretty darn even to me.
 

pinski

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
710
0
16
43
North Carolina
www.cardomain.com
Aug 1, 2006
#87
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #87
Uncle Meat said:
You sure that's a C6 in that video and not a C5? Sure didn't sound like the new C6....
Click to expand...

That was a C5 Z06 in that vid.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 1, 2006
#88
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #88
CatmanJJ said:
Seems pretty darn even to me.
Click to expand...
Yup, I’d have to agree, from a roll at those speeds its pretty even between the two, but if going from a dig or running both cars out to top end....it gets pretty ugly for the Corvette. That's where the GT's underrated, positive displacement blown 550hp/500lbs ft/tq does the talking. You Z06 lovers have got to keep in mind that the GT is a car geared to run at top end. Yes it’s got ungodly bottom end power too, but that’s thanks in full to the added grunt provided by the 2.3L Twin Screw under its bonnet. As it sits, the GT has a 16mph top speed advantage over the Z06 and at over 200mph…..that’s a f***ing HUGE difference.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
49
Maryland
Aug 1, 2006
#89
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #89
Gearbanger 101 said:
As it sits, the GT has a 16mph top speed advantage over the Z06 and at over 200mph…..that’s a f***ing HUGE difference.
Click to expand...

What's the C6 Z06 top speed? supposedly testing showed that the Ford GT went even faster then the claimed 205 mph and got it up to 212 mph but discoverd lift at 205 so I guess that's where it is limited to.

http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=18759

"Two hundred and five mph is the top speed that the car is certified and electronically limited to," said McGowan. "In testing, we actually got a car up to 212 mph, which is redline in fifth gear. Sixth gear is too tall, so you run top speed in fifth. It got to 211.89 mph, and we were bouncing off the rev limiter in fifth gear and it was still accelerating. The whole objective is to make sure the car is extremely stable, and at 200 mph, it is actually a very comfortable car to drive. Obviously never do 200 mph on a public road. You ever see those signs that say professional driver closed track? I'm that guy."
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 1, 2006
#90
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #90
CatmanJJ said:
What's the C6 Z06 top speed? supposedly testing showed that the Ford GT went even faster then the claimed 205 mph and got it up to 212 mph but discoverd lift at 205 so I guess that's where it is limited to.

http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=18759

"Two hundred and five mph is the top speed that the car is certified and electronically limited to," said McGowan. "In testing, we actually got a car up to 212 mph, which is redline in fifth gear. Sixth gear is too tall, so you run top speed in fifth. It got to 211.89 mph, and we were bouncing off the rev limiter in fifth gear and it was still accelerating. The whole objective is to make sure the car is extremely stable, and at 200 mph, it is actually a very comfortable car to drive. Obviously never do 200 mph on a public road. You ever see those signs that say professional driver closed track? I'm that guy."
Click to expand...
I've seen tests where the GT has run as fast as 214mph. If I remember correctly when they tested it on "Top Gear" they talked about taking it up to that speed once as well. You're right though, it was originally meant to run 205mph.....same as it's original GT40 predecessor. But I guess with that much more power on tap they beat the projected margins by a fair amount.

The Z06 everywhere it's been tested and in every comparison I've read seems to run 198mph. If someone knows of any that have run faster in stock trim, please post a link but as far as I know, that’s been the limit thus far. No faster, no slower....always 198mph?
 

PonyboyIsaac

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
79
1
0
44
Aug 1, 2006
#91
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #91
stole this from another message board, enjoy it
http://videos.streetfire.net/recentvideos/0/98c0da59-d89b-461e-aade-98100002e605.htm
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
49
Maryland
Aug 1, 2006
#92
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #92
PonyboyIsaac said:
stole this from another message board, enjoy it
http://videos.streetfire.net/recentvideos/0/98c0da59-d89b-461e-aade-98100002e605.htm
Click to expand...

http://forums.stangnet.com/showpost.php?p=6314262&postcount=86

It's already in this thread.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
48
Augusta, GA
www.cardomain.com
Aug 1, 2006
#93
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #93
hotmustang331 said:
IMO you should do both...if you will ONLY do one or the other, that just shows that you scared.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%

It's funny how some here claim that racing from a roll is not true racing. To me, that's no different than ricers claiming the only "real" racing is in the twisties. Most prefer to run to their car's strengths. And bolt-on NA 2V GTs is stronger from a dig. I know many wont run from a roll because they're afraid they'll get beaten by a Stage 1 SRT4.
 

PonyboyIsaac

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
79
1
0
44
Aug 1, 2006
#94
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #94
CatmanJJ said:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showpost.php?p=6314262&postcount=86

It's already in this thread.
Click to expand...
ha ha woops, thats what i get for being lazy and not rereading the thread
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Aug 1, 2006
#95
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • #95
02LaserRed2V said:
I agree 100%

It's funny how some here claim that racing from a roll is not true racing. To me, that's no different than ricers claiming the only "real" racing is in the twisties. Most prefer to run to their car's strengths. And bolt-on NA 2V GTs is stronger from a dig. I know many wont run from a roll because they're afraid they'll get beaten by a Stage 1 SRT4.
Click to expand...


when John force takes the tree at a 60 punch... I'll start roll racing.. until then "DRAG RACING" is from a standing start. Now thats not to say I havent ever done it.. I just dont see it as proof of anything.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
48
Augusta, GA
www.cardomain.com
Aug 2, 2006
#96
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #96
01Steeda said:
I just dont see it as proof of anything.
Click to expand...

You obviously didnt read all the posts on this page.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 2, 2006
#97
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #97
01Steeda said:
when John force takes the tree at a 60 punch... I'll start roll racing.. until then "DRAG RACING" is from a standing start. Now thats not to say I havent ever done it.. I just dont see it as proof of anything.
Click to expand...
Agreed 100%!!!

02LaserRed2V said:
You obviously didnt read all the posts on this page.
Click to expand...
No offence intended Lazer, but perhaps it is you that hasn’t read all of the posts on the page!?!

Going from a dig has always been the staple of both a cars performance and driver skill. Roll racing was brought about over the last few years by a bunch of kids driving 4-cylinder cars or moms grocery getter that couldn't make it to 60mph before the next light and has only bled over into the high performance crowd because it seems to be the “trendy” thing to do. Not to mention the fact that no skill is involved, so anyone can do it. Roll racing ensures that everybody can be a rock star, not just the guys with legitimate performance cars, who’ve grown to respect their power and know exactly how and when to ring out their potential. I mean…why would these guys drag race from a stop? Where's the fun in racing if nobody can tell you're doing it right? Going from a high speed roll ensures that these guys reached near triple digit speeds (and beyond for the higher horsepower rides) like the big boys in the V8 crowd with a little torque and horsepower do, before having to shut it down. On top of that, it seems that going from a roll also shows no clear winner. These guys go until one of them decides to shut down...whether it be ¼ of a mile…. ½ a mile, or whenever one of these retards starts losing their nerve because of the speeds that some of these guys travel.

Last I checked a race required a finish line? Going from a roll requires nothing....and on top of that proves nothing. It doesn’t prove a vehicles performance potential, it doesn’t prove drivers skill and it doesn’t prove which car or driver is king of the hill! And on top of that, it’s even more dangerous than a legitimate drag race.

Hasn’t anyone noticed the amount of street racing deaths has escalated exponentially over the last few years? It’s kinda funny….guys with faster cars than your latest crop of 1-4’s have been drag racing from light to light since the 60’s, yet it hadn’t become an all out epidemic until the last 5-10-years….right around the time that this “roll racing” fad hit the streets and became popular with the teenagers. The even funnier thing is, that 90% of the wrecks you hear about are low performance cars like Honda Civics, Neon’s, Sunfires and the like that haven’t got the suspension or brakes to handle these high speeds, or halt their little econo-boxes down from 100+mph like the real “sports cars” do. Coincidence….I think not!!!

I’m just waiting for the new “drifting” fad to start taking a few lives. That’ll be a whole new line of trouble for car enthusiasts.
 

PonyboyIsaac

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
79
1
0
44
Aug 2, 2006
#98
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #98
i'm just gonna ad my 2 cents and maybe this had been said, but the point of roll racing i think, is to see which car is truly faster, not which driver has more skill. It might be stupid but it helps prove what car is faster if that is the question at hand.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
48
Augusta, GA
www.cardomain.com
Aug 2, 2006
#99
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #99
Gearbanger 101 said:
Last I checked a race required a finish line? Going from a roll requires nothing....and on top of that proves nothing. It doesn’t prove a vehicles performance potential, it doesn’t prove drivers skill and it doesn’t prove which car or driver is king of the hill! And on top of that, it’s even more dangerous than a legitimate drag race.
Click to expand...

A funny car will beat a Space Shuttle in a drag race. Does that make it faster? I think not.

All I see are opinions here.

PonyboyIsaac said:
i'm just gonna ad my 2 cents and maybe this had been said, but the point of roll racing i think, is to see which car is truly faster, not which driver has more skill. It might be stupid but it helps prove what car is faster if that is the question at hand.
Click to expand...

BINGO!

And doesn't NASCAR start from a roll? Pardon me if I'm incorrect but I really don't follow stuff like that.

Bottom line: some ppl think racing from a roll doesn't prove anything and I disagree, and will leave it at that.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 2, 2006
#100
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • #100
02LaserRed2V said:
And doesn't NASCAR start from a roll? Pardon me if I'm incorrect but I really don't follow stuff like that.
Click to expand...
Ever try to drag race 50 cars lined up one in front of the other and side by side all at the same time? When was the last time you saw horse racing go from a roll?

Funny Car vs. Space shuttle....NASCAR!?!?!? Laser, I usually have nothing but respect for your opinion, but these points you're making just get weaker and weaker dude. The only thing roll racing proves is that it takes no skill in order to do it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
68
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
A
Paint and Body Are there 15'' rims for a 2000 Mustang conv. that you can use hubcaps on, If so, where might one find them.... Thank you....
  • Amazon Queen
  • Apr 5, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
111
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2026
Mustang5L5
D
WTB Looking for 4.6l 2 valve short block
  • dirk shorter
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
6
Views
304
Want to Buy Aug 28, 2025
dirk shorter
D
D
Need help for my PCM Mach1
  • Danaololo
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
175
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2025
Danaololo
D
1
Loose connection near the back of the alternator wiring harness
  • 1996 Stang GT
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
153
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
1996 Stang GT
1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?