• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 Looking For A 351w?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ry94stang50
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Oct 16, 2013
#41
  • Oct 16, 2013
  • #41
if you are going to go out and buy all new the windor swap wont be cheap. but if you know what you are doing and look around you can do it cheap. if you are comparing a no expense spared dart 8.2 deck build to a cheap overbore only windsor build, you are comparing two different animals. the 8.2 will be faster, but, ive gotten 10:1 358" windsor shortblocks with ported stock heads into the high 10s naturally aspirated with a flat tappet cam. so it can be done. if you are reusing the stock windsor crank, rods and block it can be a cheap build that will hold 700hp. even if you are going to buy a cast 408 rotating assembly its still not that expensive and can take you into the low 10s on motor if done right. they are no 4 bolt block but they will live a lot longer than even an early stock 302 or mexican block.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Oct 16, 2013
#42
  • Oct 16, 2013
  • #42
ry94stang50 said:
Good point kurt. With the money I will be saving from not going the stroker route I can throw into other places. Like my suspension. Its all aftermarket but I'm still thinking about replacing the whole damn setup. Just so I know what I have. I'm thinking about all new springs and shocks ect. One more question do you think the t5 would be good enough for 300-350hp? The car won't see thetrack to often and prob wowon't ever have slicks on her. Or could I get away with beefing the t5 up or should I still get a different trans?
Click to expand...
If you always take it easy(granny shift etc) the t5 will stay together probably. But if you start getting aggressive it will break. Plenty of people have broken them with a stock engine not alone more power. Let me emphasize this..they do not like power shifting! I am running my 2nd t5 in my present car. Broke the first one at the track banging 3rd. Now this one is starting to get iffy also but I'm waiting to put in a built tko600. For your expected power level I'd recommend stepping up to an astro t5 or a regular tremec. You don't have to go over board but I'd def upgrade
 

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
Oct 16, 2013
#43
  • Oct 16, 2013
  • #43
So in otherwords as long as "take it easy" untill I can get a new tranny ill be fine. As long as it holds out long enough for me to upgrade I would be happy. I just don't want a 6spd. I like the 5spd. Is the tko 500 or 600 a 5spd? I'm pretty sure the t56 is a 6spd right?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 16, 2013
#44
  • Oct 16, 2013
  • #44
The T5 will hold out for awhile. The great thing about them is they are cheap to fix. The TKO 500/600 would be ideal, but it's not an up front necessity.

The T56, and the Magnum T56 are both 6 speeds. Two totally different transmissions, so don't let the name confuse you. They are nice for street applications, not so great for drag racing. They are mega mega money though. Just about anyway you cut it, it cost $4K to get a T56 in a Mustang.

Kurt
 

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
Oct 17, 2013
#45
  • Oct 17, 2013
  • #45
At what point do u guys think I can t safely ake over the build? It would have to be after a shortblock because I don't want to get too involved with internals? Just mainly a hci 306?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 17, 2013
#46
  • Oct 17, 2013
  • #46
Depends on how good you are at reading directions.

Kurt
 
Reactions: stykthyn

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
Oct 17, 2013
#47
  • Oct 17, 2013
  • #47
I'm pretty good plus I have the internet and you guys too. And it would be spred out over time not rushing to get it done. Ill prob wait untill I have all the parts to finish before I start. Take my time and figure it out lol. My father used to build race cars so he knows a thing or two and my buddy is in school for building hot rods and such.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Oct 18, 2013
#48
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #48
Here is another thought...

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=10267

or

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=10271

Why not go this route? I am strongly considering one of these for my race car since it is 9.0:1 compression. I talked to the tech guys at FRPP and they said that this little motor loves boost. The price isn't bad at all either plus, you get a warranty if you don't race it. That's my .02
 

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
Oct 18, 2013
#49
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #49
That's way to expensive for what it is IMO. the 347 would be cheaper and more powerful. 7 grand for a crate motor is crazy lol. Especially since I can get a coyote swap with a trans for 8500 $.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Oct 18, 2013
#50
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #50
the problem with a stock block 347 is that they chatter the caps at high rpm and that will eventually kill the block.
 

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
Oct 18, 2013
#51
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #51
That's the thing tho I don't need crazy power and will rarely be at high rpms so these problems are not really a concern for me. Im not building a race car. I want a daily driver that has the power when I want it. 350 ish hp is fine for that. In an sn95 that should make for a f un car. I want a nice clean fresh engine and the rest will fall in place. I can't wait untill I can start the body work!
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Oct 18, 2013
#52
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #52
ry94stang50 said:
That's the thing tho I don't need crazy power and will rarely be at high rpms so these problems are not really a concern for me. Im not building a race car. I want a daily driver that has the power when I want it. 350 ish hp is fine for that. In an sn95 that should make for a f un car. I want a nice clean fresh engine and the rest will fall in place. I can't wait untill I can start the body work!
Click to expand...
Not to beat a dead horse here but don't think a 302 will get you there? You talkin 350 to the tires? If so than maybe not I dunno but if you're not looking to build a race car keep it simple.
 
Last edited: Oct 18, 2013
Reactions: clement

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Oct 18, 2013
#53
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • #53
ry94stang50 said:
That's the thing tho I don't need crazy power and will rarely be at high rpms so these problems are not really a concern for me. Im not building a race car. I want a daily driver that has the power when I want it. 350 ish hp is fine for that. In an sn95 that should make for a f un car. I want a nice clean fresh engine and the rest will fall in place. I can't wait untill I can start the body work!
Click to expand...

if that's all you want than do a decent head/intake/cam setup 302. 330rwhp is very doable.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Oct 19, 2013
#54
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #54
ry94stang50 said:
That's way to expensive for what it is IMO. the 347 would be cheaper and more powerful. 7 grand for a crate motor is crazy lol. Especially since I can get a coyote swap with a trans for 8500 $.
Click to expand...


Even WITH my shop prices it would cost me more to build that motor than to order it. Plus, I would have no warranty if i decided to put it in a street car. You have $5000 wrapped up in the block, bare heads and rotating assembly alone. Besides for me at work, time is money. So, If I were to sell that motor to a customer I would be making all my money on the labor and tuning.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 19, 2013
#55
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #55
Don't buy Ford crate engines. They are expensive and they brake.

Kurt
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Oct 19, 2013
#56
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #56
they also break
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 19, 2013
#57
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #57
Yeah, that word. Coffee isn't in yet.

Kurt
 
Reactions: madspeed

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Oct 19, 2013
#58
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #58
ry94stang50 said:
That's the thing tho I don't need crazy power and will rarely be at high rpms so these problems are not really a concern for me. Im not building a race car. I want a daily driver that has the power when I want it. 350 ish hp is fine for that. In an sn95 that should make for a f un car. I want a nice clean fresh engine and the rest will fall in place. I can't wait untill I can start the body work!
Click to expand...
Just rebuild your 302 with a good topend setup and you'll be more than happy for a dd. If/when you want more power throw some forced induction at it.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Oct 19, 2013
#59
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #59
revhead347 said:
Don't buy Ford crate engines. They are expensive and they brake.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Any "performance" engine can and will break. I am not arguing that. I have sold a few different brands and build a few for my customers and the only crate I have had no problems with are the FRPP ones. As far as price goes, everything is over priced now a days and it aint getting any better. lol. Anyways, if you aren't looking for crazy power just cam it, decent heads, decent intake and exhaust and call it good.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 19, 2013
#60
  • Oct 19, 2013
  • #60
I guarantee Rick can get you a better engine at a better price. Even if quality wasn't an issue, that engine is packaged for a hot rod. It has valve covers, timing cover, water pump etc that won't fit on an SN. You are paying for all that stuff just to take it right off.

Kurt
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
68
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
351w aluminum oil pump?
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
171
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
G
Fox engine swaps
  • Gravity
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
343
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?