• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

looking for a little insight on a 302 swap for a 99 stang

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordpeople
  • Start date Start date Jun 2, 2020
F

fordpeople

Member
May 21, 2020
13
7
13
somewhere
Jun 2, 2020
#1
  • Jun 2, 2020
  • #1
Hi
so my friend wants me to put a new engine in there 99 v6 mustang that they blew the head gasket out of. so they always wanted a v8 and I just happened to have a 302 that i had planned on putting in my 70 cougar but never did . we both agreed that it would be really awesome if it was a carb car instead of a fuel infected or the proper term injected. the thing is there are thing that I'm not to sure of like how the heck will i do this i haven't done this before but I've seen people do it and I was just wondering if any one has and whats in store for me and my friend.
Thank you
 

Olivethefet

I will own your nuts! LOL
5 Year Member
May 17, 2018
2,596
1,790
143
Enterprise AL
Jun 2, 2020
#2
  • Jun 2, 2020
  • #2
Is the 302 that you have a fuel injected motor? How complete is it? Why do you want to put a carb on it? With everything on the market these days EFI seems to be a way better option. I have not done a swap like this, so I wont be any help to you. Answering my questions though will help others that have more insight then me.
 

tsemmett

Active Member
Jul 2, 2019
276
33
38
US
Jun 2, 2020
#3
  • Jun 2, 2020
  • #3
EFI is definitely the better option, but a carb is going to be the easier swap here. To each their own I suppose.

As for the swap, I do know that the gauges won't work, as they are computer controlled; you'll need to either swap in a 94-98 cluster (which fits, but will have to be rewired), or an aftermarket set. K Member may also be a problem; as I understand it, that car has a modular K member, so you would need a 94-95 or Tubular K member for a small block. The other systems I've not looked at from this context.
 
Reactions: fordpeople
F

fordpeople

Member
May 21, 2020
13
7
13
somewhere
Jun 5, 2020
#4
  • Jun 5, 2020
  • #4
Olivethefet said:
Is the 302 that you have a fuel injected motor? How complete is it? Why do you want to put a carb on it? With everything on the market these days EFI seems to be a way better option. I have not done a swap like this, so I wont be any help to you. Answering my questions though will help others that have more insight then me.
Click to expand...
NO it has never been a fuel injection motor Its out of a 69 torino with very low miles and its complete just need to put back on the timing cover and the valve covers.#1 reason we want to put a carb in it is that there easy to work on and worth the time to work on I like to call it fuel infected beacuse it is we both prefer carbed and manual trans I was also thinking that maybe my pair of winsor heads i got in my shop that are not being used would work on there to And the thing about EFI is that it ok but they have so meany issues electronic that I dont want that and neither does my friend. But thanks for the reply hope i answered some of the questions you asked
 
F

fordpeople

Member
May 21, 2020
13
7
13
somewhere
Jun 5, 2020
#5
  • Jun 5, 2020
  • #5
tsemmett said:
EFI is definitely the better option, but a carb is going to be the easier swap here. To each their own I suppose.

As for the swap, I do know that the gauges won't work, as they are computer controlled; you'll need to either swap in a 94-98 cluster (which fits, but will have to be rewired), or an aftermarket set. K Member may also be a problem; as I understand it, that car has a modular K member, so you would need a 94-95 or Tubular K member for a small block. The other systems I've not looked at from this context.
Click to expand...
well thank you that was the issues that i had heard of with these swaps The k Member is there any cars that you know of that would work as a donor parts to me are pretty limitless exept the fact that all the cars in my friends junk yard are all v6 and the v8 have serious issues. but thanks again I'll do some more research.
Thanks FP
 

tsemmett

Active Member
Jul 2, 2019
276
33
38
US
Jun 5, 2020
#6
  • Jun 5, 2020
  • #6
For the K member, only the 94-95 Mustang had the small block pattern. V6 or V8 should be fine; they simply adapted the V6 mounts to fit whatever V8 was being used at the time.
 
Reactions: fordpeople
F

fordpeople

Member
May 21, 2020
13
7
13
somewhere
Jun 5, 2020
#7
  • Jun 5, 2020
  • #7
Awsome thank you so much your a great help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
171
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
766
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
345
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
956
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
667
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?