• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

LS-1 power not out there for us.

  • Thread starter Thread starter billfisher
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mineralgray2002

New Member
Dec 4, 2005
33
2
0
Centralia, Illinois
Dec 29, 2006
#21
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #21
hotmustang331 said:
I am your worst nightmare! (note teh busa)

LOL, I ran it up to 150 the other day...just SOOOOOOOOO fast, its not even breathing doing it. The thing is gaining MPH faster @ 150 than my GT did in 2nd gear @ 40MPH lol..its rediculous.
Click to expand...

Its awesome gettin up to about 150. Ive had my 06 gsxr 600 up there a couple times and it was beggin for me to crack the throttle some more. Its amazing how fast they can accelerate. but i do have like 108horse to the wheel and it weighs about 600 with me on it.
 

Superhereaux

chicks make me feel inadequate
Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
538
3
59
South Texas
Dec 30, 2006
#22
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #22
Dope 97GT said:
are you guys comparing stock ls-1s to modded 2v's?
Click to expand...

nope, just the original poster
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Dec 30, 2006
#23
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #23
350 hp stock vs 260 hp stock. This is like a civic forum trying to argue that a mustang isn't so far off all you gotta do is turbo nitrous cam exhaust etc... and then when that said civic beats me, assuming im driving a stock mustang, id be like, im driving a stock mustang lol!
 

bullitt_2620

Member
Oct 11, 2005
91
0
6
San Diego, cali.
Dec 30, 2006
#24
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #24
What do they mean by M6, when referring to the camaro, or gto? I tried but for the life of me couldn't figure it out.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Dec 30, 2006
#25
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #25
6 SPD transmission. A4 = automatic 4 speed.

Falcon guy, its not that big of a difference. Race one at the track and you will see....most stock LS1 F bodys run 13.5-13.7 at best. The night I ran my car the 2nd fastest one was a 13.0 car...and it wasnt stock. It pulled noticably harder than the other 3-4 LS1 F body cars there. Fastest one was pretty modded and running low 12s or something.
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Dec 30, 2006
#26
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #26
I know they arent too far off, but this is almost a whiney argument thats all.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Dec 30, 2006
#27
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #27
Yea...bottom line is they are faster. Mod for mod, they will always be faster. Thats why you put on mods that most LS1 guys dont do...RE: Twin turbos.

And as for the few TT/500+RWHP ls1s out there...I doubt ill ever meet one.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Dec 30, 2006
#28
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #28
Stock LS1s don't exactly worry me, especially on the street.

There are a lot of modded f-bodies at the track but I rarely see them on the street.
 

Dope 97GT

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
439
0
0
Rochester, NY (SUNY Brockport)
Dec 31, 2006
#29
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #29
well when you are comparing engines that are similar in the year they were produced and basically in direct competition i feel it goes something like this:

In the mid 90s it was LS-1 cars for GM and NPI Mustangs for ford.

Then came the PI mustang while GM brought out the LS-2

Then fords best attempt besides the Shelby GT500 was the 03/04 cobra holds its own to vettes and the LS-2s in them.

But then chevy put the LS-7 in the Z06 and i would say that engine holds its own against the 5.4 in the GT500 which is still supercharged and not much faster in the 1/4 than the terminator.

I know there is a Ford GT out there but mildly modded z06's can compete with them.

I am a ford guy all the way dont get me wrong...but you cant really compare a modded 04 2v to a mid 90 to late 90s LS-1. Let alone a semi modded 05 5.4 3v.

If you disagree with me let me know cause im not an expert or anything and i dont claim to be this is just my perception and how i think a non biased viewer would view the comparison.
 

mattkimsey

I've compiled a list to recap this thread:
Jan 22, 2004
346
0
0
Bessemer City NC
Dec 31, 2006
#30
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #30
Any way you slice it, a stock LS1 fbody is about 0.9 seconds faster(1/4) than a stock 2v Mustang when both cars are driven to their potential. Comparing stock vs stock with equal drivers is the ONLY way to do it.

And yes, the fbody can be modded and they respond well. For example: http://www.motorsporttech.com/press/gmhtp_may2004_02.html

The lid/catback '00 LS1 made 331rwhp WITHOUT the LS6 intake -- substitute a cutout for the catback and you have 331 rwhp(390hp) for around $100.

Maybe Evan Smith said it best: View attachment 414049 http://www.stangbangers.com/01_Bullitt_Article2.htm

Notice that he ran 12.96 in the SS with a full fuel tank/lousy air and 13.91 in the Bullitt. Both cars were tested in the same bad conditions and the LS1 ran almost a full second faster. With 321rwhp it made 82hp more than a Bullitt and about 95rwhp more than you average GT.

"With any kind of air, the SS might have gone 12.70s or better. On stock radials"
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Dec 31, 2006
#31
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #31
LS1's are fast, period. Hell, a buddy of mine has a ls1 goat with JUST a g5x3 cam from lg motorsports, stalled auto, and 255x16 MT ET Street Radials and runs mid 11's at the track, and hangs with me on the highway.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 31, 2006
#32
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #32
Pennywise2 said:
Most of us do know this true but,we are not too far behind indeed.
Their major advantage is displacement.
Don't the 01-02 LS1 cars dyno 300-310 rwhp bone stock?
Way to stick it to the enemy lol.
Click to expand...

I have seen a friends 01 SS dyno 319 rwhp stock and an 01 WS6 with less than 1000 miles dyno 325 bone stock. My old roomates 02 WS6 with a lid and cutout made 331rwhp in her A4.

Most I have seen are 300-315 for a 6 speed and 290-300 for an A4

Most the ones I have seen run 13.1-13.5 bone stock. I ran 13.4@105 in 85* heat with a 2.2 60' in the catfish.

And as for the few TT/500+RWHP ls1s out there...I doubt ill ever meet one.
Click to expand...
I can introduce you to a 1000 rwhp daily driver that was the cover article for GMHTP along with a few 600-700 rwhp Turbo LS1's. Our local F-Body club has 3 Turbo cars making over 500, 630, 1000 and a Firehawk with a F1C on a 402 making over 600. Also a few turboed LS1 cars in Virginia Beach. You wont see them on the street though.

NitrofishGT said:
My best friend has a 00 SS M6 with a lid, cat-back, and a couple little things and a hypertech programmer. We run probably once a week whenever we get the chance. I pull away from him steadily on just a 50 shot. On a 100 It's a beating. I'd say he's a good driver for the most part. It's just F-bodys aren't that much faster than GT's IMO
Click to expand...

You ran a stock LS1 with a lid and catback with a bolt on 2V spraying a 100 shot and you won? You don't say. How about running him on motor and see what the outcome is. I have yet to see a stock 2V run a 13.3 on street tires.

2V vs LS1 bolt on for bolt on, hell I will include heads and cams, the LS1 will always be faster, and make more power than a stock shortblock 2V. There are some H/C/I bolt stoick bottom end on LS1's making upward of 475-500 hp NA
 

mustangkid05

New Member
Mar 10, 2006
199
0
0
Dec 31, 2006
#33
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #33
so they are faster but they look like doo doo & mustangs sound much much better
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Dec 31, 2006
#34
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #34
Yea it takes full boltons and H/C/I for a 2V to make it to 330RWHP in most cases....LS1 cars can do that with a few boltons as mentioned. I think the think here is that most LS1 drivers just plain suck at driving
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 31, 2006
#35
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #35
hotmustang331 said:
Yea it takes full boltons and H/C/I for a 2V to make it to 330RWHP in most cases....LS1 cars can do that with a few boltons as mentioned. I think the think here is that most LS1 drivers just plain suck at driving
Click to expand...
Yup. Pretty much sums it up.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Dec 31, 2006
#36
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #36
I think too many here compare their modded 2V to a stock LS1. I don't take any LS1 lightly. Like 03/04 Cobras, I assume they're all modded, even though a couple I've encountered on the streets were stock.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Dec 31, 2006
#37
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #37
blackfang said:
I have seen a friends 01 SS dyno 319 rwhp stock and an 01 WS6 with less than 1000 miles dyno 325 bone stock. My old roomates 02 WS6 with a lid and cutout made 331rwhp in her A4.

Most I have seen are 300-315 for a 6 speed and 290-300 for an A4

Most the ones I have seen run 13.1-13.5 bone stock. I ran 13.4@105 in 85* heat with a 2.2 60' in the catfish.
Click to expand...
Those numbers stock are pretty impressive stock on the WS6's.
The first time my friend took me for a ride in his 00 WS6 he did
a 5K rpm blast and I got knots in my stomach lol.
Alot of the turbo LS1 cars I have seen are not smog legal or CARB certified.
 

tontot77

Do I look like a :taco: in this picture?
Apr 2, 2003
409
0
16
Dyer Indiana
Dec 31, 2006
#38
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #38
GM's have us beat other than the 03/04 Cobra and hopefully the new Shelby, but I'm not so sure about the later. You have to be highly modded to compete, even against some of the SRT4's out there.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
PI Headswap Write-Up
  • 5spd GT
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
67K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 4, 2020
Thomas Camp
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?