• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

LT's and Prochamber

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1QWK96GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 14, 2006

1QWK96GT

Member
Nov 28, 2004
44
0
7
Mar 14, 2006
#1
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #1
Well I have finally got my exhaust installed. Its Mac lt's, prochamber, with a flowmaster catback. It sounds badass, but I feel like I lost power. Going from a dead stop if I get on it the car acts like it has lost power until it hits 3k rpm's then it SCREAMS. Before the LT's and prochamber I had stock exhaust manifolds, upr x-pipe, and flowmaster catback . With my old setup it was not as sluggish from idle to 3k. After the install it did throw a rear 02 sensor code, which I have not taken care of yet. Right now I have stock gears and I feel that may have SOME to do with it. Anyone else with a similar experience? Could something be wrong? Thanks
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Mar 14, 2006
#2
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #2
that's normal. your power band has chnged with those mods, so that's why it feels different. it's all good
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Mar 14, 2006
#3
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #3
I thought long tubes gave you more low end torque.
 

1QWK96GT

Member
Nov 28, 2004
44
0
7
Mar 14, 2006
#4
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #4
Did this happen to you as well? It kind of sucks I want my bottom end back.
 

1QWK96GT

Member
Nov 28, 2004
44
0
7
Mar 14, 2006
#5
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #5
I just found this and it confuses me because everything they are saying seems to be the exact opposite of how my car is performing with them? http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?threadid=18807&highlight=long+tube+results
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Mar 14, 2006
#6
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #6
It is completely normal to lose down low power when doing LT's.. the reason why is because there is less restriction now. The less restriction will help you out up top though. A dyno tune MAY fix some of your problem.. it did mine at least but I was running almost 20% lean.. here's my dyno graph anyways

 
S

stng

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
182
0
0
Mar 14, 2006
#7
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #7
I lost some low end torque as well, but it really made a big differnce up top. If you want some of your low end torque back get some hi-flo cats to help with some back pressure or get yourself some gears to compensate for the lost of low end torque...
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Mar 14, 2006
#8
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #8
How was the quality of the mac headers?.. i'm really considering those due to the price.. I love my prochamber and flowmaster combo, I really wanna stick with that setup but with LT's..

Got any sound clips?
 

1QWK96GT

Member
Nov 28, 2004
44
0
7
Mar 14, 2006
#9
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #9
Well that makes me feel a little better, since its not just my car. I have already been out running the car hard, should I go to a dyno and get my a/f ratio checked before I do anymore driving? I already have 4.10's, I just have not gotten around to installing them. I will wait to see how that turns out. The quality of the mac lt's are fine, and the price is definitely right. I do not have any sound clips yet, but I will get some soon. It sounds bad ass. Is that dyno before and after lt's? If so thats some good gains.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Mar 14, 2006
#10
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #10
I've been contemplating the Mac longtubes, but have heard too many bad things and it kinda scared me away.. were your's ceramic or HTS coated?

Not sure, but I think that dyno graph was before and after tune, with LT's on in the baseline run.. I could be wrong tho
 

1QWK96GT

Member
Nov 28, 2004
44
0
7
Mar 14, 2006
#11
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #11
Mine are the HTS coated ones. I really dont care what they look like, so I got those. I have a buddy who has had the HTS coated ones for 2 years and his only have some surface rust. Which doesnt affect their function.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Mar 14, 2006
#12
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #12
yeah that dyno was before and after the tune.. I had SLP LTs, SLP O/R Xpipe, Steeda Catback, Steeda CAI, and Accufab 75mm TB and Plenum
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
318
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
3
Fox Vacuum tree replacement?
  • 387lx
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
234
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
gkomo
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
641
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
271
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
289
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?