MAC catback vs. Flows...help me

[woody's bullitt]

i'm looking to go the more traditional route with an o/r h-pipe and a two chamber muffler on my 91 lx vert. i've listened to sound clips, but it's really difficult to make a choice. i realize this may be a matter of taste, but can anyone compel me with differences in build quality, fitment, or sound quality distinctions? the cost is about the same. so that isn't really an issue. i know the MAC comes black powdercoated with 3 inch tips, but aside from that, what else is there to say?

thanks for the help,
woody

 

[Roland69]

did you listen to the one in my sig....It's all stock with (I think flowmaster 40's)

 

[legalize420]

i like my mac's. they fit and sound great. i recently had the tailpipes cut off but here is a clip with the tails.

http://media.putfile.com/idle-4

 

[GearHd6]

MAC is nice because of there 2 piece tails if you dont have a lift. Its tough to get the flowmaster tails over the axle without a lift or without taking the rearend half out of the car.

 

[Ozz]

MACs are gruntier/deeper and less "tinny" than Flows

 

[Speeds8erM-1]

Mac has more of a sound than Flowsmashers, which just sound like noise. I have had 3 fox bodys and every one of them had Flowmasters when I bought them, yuck. I never bothered to change them as I never kept one long enough. If I had, the Flowsmashers would have been out the door.

 

[Roland69]

hummm I like the sound of mine but I've never heard a fox with Magnaflow's in person b4

 

[Roland69]

hummm I like the sound of mine but I've never heard a fox with Magnaflow's in person b4

 

[Roland69]

WTF is with my puter....I hate it and it's about to go for a trip out the upstairs window......someone sell me a computer lol

 

[25thmustang]

Had Flowmaster, now have Mac... Mac sounds better IMO. Deeper and less tinny like mentioned before. Also looking to get rid of it this summer!