• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

MAF Voltage Readings.

  • Thread starter Thread starter PonyGTrider
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2023
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Oct 15, 2023
#1
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #1
Hi there,
In my 90 GT twisted wedge, TFS intakes, TFS-1 cam, 19lb injectors, 65mm TB, and Cold Air Intake, I have a 70mm MAF tube and F2VF-12B579-AA sensor out of a 95 V6.
What do you think about those readings? They kind of look weird to me…

Idle - 0.951 Volts
20 mph - 1.935 Volts
40 mph - 0.179 Volts
60 mph - 1.904 volts

I know the stock MAF set up supposed to have:

Idle - 0.60 Volts
20 mph - 1.10 Volts
40 mph - 1.70 Volts
60 mph - 2.10 Volts

What the readings supposed to be on that 70mm MAF????

Would you agree that maybe that F2VF sensor is bad? And if that’s the case what would be the symptoms??? Perhaps higher fuel consumption or what else?

Anyone running that same MAF tube and sensor that had taken those measurements and if you can share them would be great!

Engine runs good I guess and idles good but I still have bad MPG, something like 9 -10 mpg and believe me I don’t have a lead foot.

Thanks for helping me on this one
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Oct 15, 2023
#2
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #2
PonyGTrider said:
Hi there,
In my 90 GT twisted wedge, TFS intakes, TFS-1 cam, 19lb injectors, 65mm TB, and Cold Air Intake, I have a 70mm MAF tube and F2VF-12B579-AA sensor out of a 95 V6.
What do you think about those readings? They kind of look weird to me…

Idle - 0.951 Volts
20 mph - 1.935 Volts
40 mph - 0.179 Volts
60 mph - 1.904 volts

I know the stock MAF set up supposed to have:

Idle - 0.60 Volts
20 mph - 1.10 Volts
40 mph - 1.70 Volts
60 mph - 2.10 Volts

What the readings supposed to be on that 70mm MAF????

Would you agree that maybe that F2VF sensor is bad? And if that’s the case what would be the symptoms??? Perhaps higher fuel consumption or what else?

Anyone running that same MAF tube and sensor that had taken those measurements and if you can share them would be great!

Engine runs good I guess and idles good but I still have bad MPG, something like 9 -10 mpg and believe me I don’t have a lead foot.

Thanks for helping me on this one
Click to expand...
… By the way, NO ERROR CODES in case someone wondering.
I’ll read you with great interest
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 15, 2023
#3
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #3
I think measuring voltage against MPH is very arbitrary.

That said, a larger MAF is going to sample a smaller quantity of air inside of a larger opening. If the tune is not doing the math then the meter will have need to be scaled so that the appropriate amount of fuel is given for the sampled volume of air.

So, it stands to reason that voltage outputs are higher because the meter is sampling a smaller quantity of air and compensating for a larger overall mass of air (because the housing is larger).

So the number you listed appear to scale in the correct direction.

This line however, looks like an anomaly. It should be between those two other values:

PonyGTrider said:
40 mph - 0.179 Volts
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Oct 15, 2023
#4
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #4
Noobz347 said:
I think measuring voltage against MPH is very arbitrary.

That said, a larger MAF is going to sample a smaller quantity of air inside of a larger opening. If the tune is not doing the math then the meter will have need to be scaled so that the appropriate amount of fuel is given for the sampled volume of air.

So, it stands to reason that voltage outputs are higher because the meter is sampling a smaller quantity of air and compensating for a larger overall mass of air (because the housing is larger).

So the number you listed appear to scale in the correct direction.

This line however, looks like an anomaly. It should be between those two other values:
Click to expand...
Understood, but as a comparison the two sets of voltage look so weird to me. The stock MAF the reading looks linear. More speed more volts. In the 70mm MAF does not show linearity at all the only numbers that make some sense are the Idle and 20mph, the 40mph reading supposed to be higher than the the 20mph and the 60 mph voltage supposed to be higher than the 40mph voltage. It is definitely contrary to the logic stated on the stock MAF setup.

I’ll do the measurements again insure repeatability.

Are this “faulty” readings related to too high fuel consumption???

Then what to do next?
Thank you all for the help
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 15, 2023
#5
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #5
I would get it tuned.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

Kid wita 5oh

I'm definitely not in the original hole
Founding Member
Nov 5, 2000
1,406
149
93
Saugus, MA
Oct 15, 2023
#6
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #6
Bigger heads... Bigger flow, even at idle...

I just recently tested voltage between a pro-m and a stock MAF (19lb injs) both read EXACTLY the same at idle at 1.02-1.1v
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Oct 15, 2023
#7
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • #7
Kid wita 5oh said:
Bigger heads... Bigger flow, even at idle...

I just recently tested voltage between a pro-m and a stock MAF (19lb injs) both read EXACTLY the same at idle at 1.02-1.1v
Click to expand...
I got bad luck, I guess…
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 29, 2024
#8
  • Apr 29, 2024
  • #8
Hi all,
I'm just trying to alive this thread.
I was runing a test on 94-95 Mustang GT 70mm MAF. The readings don't seem normal to me if someone could give an opinion; I measure the voltage between pins C and D standing still and this is what I got:
IDLE speed 0.920 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.135 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.475 Volts DC

According to another forum the voltage at those rpm's supossed to be:
IDLE speed 0.9 - 1.0 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.4 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.8 Volts DC

Any thoughts, please?
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,801
903
143
Apr 29, 2024
#9
  • Apr 29, 2024
  • #9
PonyGTrider said:
Hi all,
I'm just trying to alive this thread.
I was runing a test on 94-95 Mustang GT 70mm MAF. The readings don't seem normal to me if someone could give an opinion; I measure the voltage between pins C and D standing still and this is what I got:
IDLE speed 0.920 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.135 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.475 Volts DC

According to another forum the voltage at those rpm's supossed to be:
IDLE speed 0.9 - 1.0 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.4 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.8 Volts DC

Any thoughts, please?
Click to expand...
So your first set of readings are the 70mm MAF, what MAF is the second set - stock?

Your injectors, are they the OEM '90 injectors? If so, have they been cleaned?
 

DeathProof88

Active Member
Dec 11, 2015
99
34
28
PA
Apr 29, 2024
#10
  • Apr 29, 2024
  • #10
I'm no expert but I've worked on Toyotas for years... I don't think I would base anything on speed and more on rpm and load.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,183
17,886
224
Massachusetts
Apr 30, 2024
#11
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • #11
PonyGTrider said:
Hi all,
I'm just trying to alive this thread.
I was runing a test on 94-95 Mustang GT 70mm MAF. The readings don't seem normal to me if someone could give an opinion; I measure the voltage between pins C and D standing still and this is what I got:
IDLE speed 0.920 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.135 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.475 Volts DC

According to another forum the voltage at those rpm's supossed to be:
IDLE speed 0.9 - 1.0 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.4 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.8 Volts DC

Any thoughts, please?
Click to expand...


I run the same MAF but don't have readings at this time. If i can think of it i can take some at some point. How are you measuring?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,849
10,530
203
polk county florida
Apr 30, 2024
#12
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • #12
See #7 here:

Help me create the "Surging Idle Checklist"

Updated 05 July 2022 to add rough idle when cold and smooth idle when up to normal operating temperature. See the EGR tech information, section #15 for more help. Many of you are familiar with the "Cranks OK, but No Start Checklist for Fuel Injected Mustangs" checklist and the No Crank...
www.stangnet.com
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 30, 2024
#13
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • #13
KRUISR said:
So your first set of readings are the 70mm MAF, what MAF is the second set - stock?

Your injectors, are they the OEM '90 injectors? If so, have they been cleaned?
Click to expand...
Yes first readings are from the 70mm MAF the second redings are from the 55mm MAF. I just serviced the injectors and ther are in perfect conditions. This comparisson of readings are intended to findout if it has anything to do with my poor Miles Per Gallon issue
 
Last edited: Apr 30, 2024

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,183
17,886
224
Massachusetts
Apr 30, 2024
#14
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • #14
Here's some published data



Got it from here.

MAF Transfer Curves / EFIDynoTuning
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 30, 2024
#15
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • #15
Mustang5L5 said:
Here's some published data



Got it from here.

MAF Transfer Curves / EFIDynoTuning
Click to expand...
Thank you, I’m not sure how (If there is a way) to calculate or translate my figures to find a flow rate…
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,183
17,886
224
Massachusetts
May 1, 2024
#16
  • May 1, 2024
  • #16
PonyGTrider said:
Thank you, I’m not sure how (If there is a way) to calculate or translate my figures to find a flow rate…
Click to expand...

I think the main take-away is that it's not going to be similar readings. ALso, it's one data point and i'm not sure of their source of the data, so take it with a grain of salt.


Kinda one of those times you wish EEC-IV could output the same sort of data OBD2 can, so you can look at things like fuel trims and o2 sensor voltage swings.

Swap your stock MAF in. You'll lose a bit of power but you can see if you notice any significant difference in fuel economy.
 

CassieL

Active Member
May 15, 2024
128
130
53
Tyler Texas
Jun 2, 2024
#17
  • Jun 2, 2024
  • #17
PonyGTrider said:
Hi all,
I'm just trying to alive this thread.
I was runing a test on 94-95 Mustang GT 70mm MAF. The readings don't seem normal to me if someone could give an opinion; I measure the voltage between pins C and D standing still and this is what I got:
IDLE speed 0.920 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.135 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.475 Volts DC

According to another forum the voltage at those rpm's supossed to be:
IDLE speed 0.9 - 1.0 Volts DC
1,500 rpm 1.4 Volts DC
2,500 rpm 1.8 Volts DC

Any thoughts, please?
Click to expand...
What method are you using to measure?
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jun 2, 2024
#18
  • Jun 2, 2024
  • #18
CassieL said:
What method are you using to measure?
Click to expand...
I'm using a DVM taking measurements at idle, at 1,500 RPM, and at 2,500 RPM. Also another method: At idle, at 20 MPH, at 40 MPH, and at 60MPH. Al the readings do not correlate and it is all over so I don't know of another wau to do that.
 

CassieL

Active Member
May 15, 2024
128
130
53
Tyler Texas
Jun 2, 2024
#19
  • Jun 2, 2024
  • #19
Dvm isn't accurate for that, they use average voltage. A scope will be more accurate .
A 90' doesn't support live data and that's what we usually use to see what the computer sees.
As long as you're not getting trouble codes then the computer is fine with what it's getting.
Usually with a ford we want under a volt at idle, 1-2 volts between 1k and 3k above 2 v above 3k
 

CassieL

Active Member
May 15, 2024
128
130
53
Tyler Texas
Jun 2, 2024
#20
  • Jun 2, 2024
  • #20
These are data scans of a 95 mustang ecu used for the maf conversion in my truck.
You can see how the maf, tps, o2 and rpm all move with each other.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230812_100728246.webp
    473.7 KB · Views: 114
  • IMG_20230823_162308740~2.webp
    342.8 KB · Views: 107
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
290
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
211
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
T
  • Locked
1990 2.3L automatic - real bad engine sputtering
  • the_steve_randolph
  • Jun 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2024
the_steve_randolph
T
A9L on 94 engine, no priming injector pulse?
  • Wallyman
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Jun 24, 2024
Wallyman
C
Electrical New Codes 29/98/66 - wont run unless MAF unplugged (all volt and ohms checked at maf)
  • cablegod
  • Nov 5, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2022
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?