• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

MAF

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.0GT-Neal
  • Start date Start date May 18, 2004
5

5.0GT-Neal

Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
370
0
0
May 18, 2004
#1
  • May 18, 2004
  • #1
I have a mostly stock engine. What size of MAF should i run? Do you need inlet pipes?

neal
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
May 18, 2004
#2
  • May 18, 2004
  • #2
Are you still running your stock air box and TB?
I put in a 75mm for 19# injectors along with a 65mm tb and CAI when I replaced mine. If you are still running stock tb and box I don't see the need to change your MAF yet unless its bad.
 

jermy82

Founding Member
Feb 2, 2002
446
0
0
Sherman, Illinois
May 18, 2004
#3
  • May 18, 2004
  • #3
Yeah, I wouldn't mess with it unless you are at the point where you need bigger injectors. It's just one of those mods that won't give you that much back for the money you have to spend on it. If you are dead set on getting one, I'd say get a C&L so you can just change the sampling tube if you upgrade later.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
May 18, 2004
#4
  • May 18, 2004
  • #4
Get the MAF. These guys have no proof to back up what they are saying. My very first mod to my car was a 76mm C&L calibrated for 19 lb/hr injectors. It came with a new K&N, heat shield, inlet tube, and MAF. It gave the car a noticeable gain all over the power band. The throttle response was way better, and even with the stock intake, it gave me about another 100-200 RPM up top. It was well worth it.

Joe
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
May 18, 2004
#5
  • May 18, 2004
  • #5
Whoah...Slow down there

Did you bother to read my post thoroughly?
I said that I DIDN"T see the need for one, NOT that he should not get it.
You got yours with a K&N and an inlet tube. If he is still running his stock box and is only replacing the MAF only then he can do other things with $200 than replacing the MAF. IMO
Do you have any documented dyno PROOF that it gave you the results you said or are you just saying this b/c you think that is what it gave you?
 

jermy82

Founding Member
Feb 2, 2002
446
0
0
Sherman, Illinois
May 19, 2004
#6
  • May 19, 2004
  • #6
I stick by what I say. Not to start a debate or anything, but I just replaced my MAF with a 75mm Pro-M and noticed a slight difference, so I'm not saying it's useless by any means, but unless you're doing injectors I think there are better things you can do with that kind of money. No, I didn't waste the money on a dyno after this one mod so I don't have "proof," but I'd definately take my H-pipe for example over the MAF. Just my opinion, and I really believe I'm right. So take the advice or leave it I guess.
 

brentwoodboy

New Member
Nov 25, 2002
472
0
0
Brentwood, TN
May 19, 2004
#7
  • May 19, 2004
  • #7
No gains? Funny. Before I added my 65 mm BBK TB, 75 mm Bullet and Fenderwell CAI all I had was full exhaust and 3.73's (and badass tranny), when I added that stuff, reset the computer, I had big gains. Mostly from 2500-4500, also, a cool whistling sound.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
May 19, 2004
#8
  • May 19, 2004
  • #8
Well, neither of us have dyno proven results, but I think we speak from "experience."

JR, I read your post throughly and you said "If you are still running stock tb and box I don't see the need to change your MAF yet unless its bad."

This is why I suggested the C&L, which eliminates the airbox and inlet tubing.

Joe
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
May 19, 2004
#9
  • May 19, 2004
  • #9
Joe, that's cool I just didn't think you understood my comment.
Yes C&L is a nice set-up. It sounded like he just wanted to replace the MAF alone in his stock box. I had a 75 Maf, CAI and 65 mmTB when I did mine and yes it did improve but it was done all together so I can't say myself that I know what just the MAF mod alone would do.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
May 19, 2004
#10
  • May 19, 2004
  • #10
If you are doing major power ad-ons soon, DONT get C&L. Get a ProM 77 (or 80 to save some $$).

This way, you get it ONCE with the right calibration. My friend did his 95 years ago with MAF, TB, and U/L intake all at once, and he said it felt like a new car.

I agree with JR that unless it's bad, changing out only the MAF is probably not worth the $$, since it could be better used.

RC
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
May 19, 2004
#11
  • May 19, 2004
  • #11
I'd wait on the MAF until you have to upgrade the injectors so you dont have to spend even more money getting it reclaibrated By then you'll really have a need for a new and bigger MAF. Hell... I'm still running the stock MAF
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
274
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
329
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
609
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
449
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?