• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Matching numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zer0
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2006
Z

Zer0

New Member
Oct 4, 2005
16
0
0
California
Feb 13, 2006
#1
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #1
How do i find out if my 64 stang has the original motor in it?
 

wild70stang

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
317
0
0
Feb 13, 2006
#2
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #2
The casting number should be behind the starter.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 13, 2006
#3
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #3
What engine's in it? 6 or 8 cylinder ?
 
Z

Zer0

New Member
Oct 4, 2005
16
0
0
California
Feb 14, 2006
#4
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #4
260 V8
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Feb 14, 2006
#5
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #5
on my old boss302 there was a boss on the top of the block just behind the intake manifold, basically the same surface the intake sealed to... that was stamped with the last 5 digits (i think) of the VIN, so there was no question of "dates" it either matched the vin or it didn't.
I'm not sure if this is the same on the earlier models however.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 14, 2006
#6
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #6
Ford, at least in the 60's didn't make it a common practice to stamp VIN # on engines or transmissions. Actually to find one is quite rare--it is more common for GM to mark their engines.

Most Fords parts that do have VIN stampings are the truly special cars and engines, such as the Boss 302, 428CJ, or 289 Hipo K code engines--even then Ford didn't necessarily stamp them.

On your 64' Mustang, the best you can do is to verify that the engine installed has casted part #'s and dates that are near (and certainly not later than) the assembly date of the car. I believe that it is commonly accepted that most engine blocks, heads, intake, exhaust manifolds, etc. will probably have been cast maybe 2 months before the actual car build. It could even be as much as 4 months (or more) or closer to 1 month.

Because of this, and the fact that the Mustang was introduced at the end of 1964, most Mustang people will accept any 64' built 260 V8 as being the proper engine for your original 260 VIN'ed car.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 14, 2006
#7
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #7
If you have a 64.5 ( or rather an early 65 according to Ford) and it's got a 260 in it, then it's a pretty good bet that's the original engine. Unless someone replaced it in the last 40 years. Now, you SURE it's a 260 ? Could also be a 289 or a 302, same basic engine. really hard to tell one from another unless you know what to look for. The casting numbers on the block will tell you for sure and it should have a 5 bolt bellhousing ( early 289's did there as well, so the casting numbers are fool proof here)
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Feb 15, 2006
#8
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #8
Thanks for the info guys, I really appreciate it. I've only really "cared" about numbers matching on my boss302... good to know that info about the casting number/vin relationship.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Feb 15, 2006
#9
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #9
Just for reference, the blue '68 fastback I'm building had the original C-code 289-2bbl and C4 in it, and both are stamped with the car's VIN. The block is stamped on the flat surface just behind the intake and the trans is stamped on one of the bosses on the top surface. I'm fairly certain that this practice started in '68, and then only sometimes. I've seen it on 390 cars and the like, but never before on a "lowly" C-code car.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 15, 2006
#10
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #10
I think Dennis pretty well summed it up.

I'm with Reen, I have NEVER heard of a c-code stamped with a VIN. Have you spoken to the MCA about that?
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Feb 15, 2006
#11
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #11
I agree, I think Dennis summed it up.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Feb 15, 2006
#12
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #12
Edbert said:
I'm with Reen, I have NEVER heard of a c-code stamped with a VIN. Have you spoken to the MCA about that?
Click to expand...
No, I haven't made much of a fuss about it. MCA may be interested though, now that you mention it. The engine and trans are still sitting here -- I'll snap some pics of the numbers later. It's pretty neat.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Feb 25, 2006
#13
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #13
It's a customer's car so I blurred out the last 3 digits, but you get the picture. It's interesting that the 3 digits denoting the body style and engine type are left out: 8R150XXX.



 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 25, 2006
#14
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #14
I was going through my Toploader 4 speed cases and ALL 4 of them have serial #s similar to the block that Reen has. The 428 CJ and the 64' 390 ones I can understand as possible being marked because the are "special.".

The other 2 blocks are RUG E3's which are common wide ratio boxes found behind 69' 302/351's.

Interestingly, one E3 was made for a Califorinia built car. It was stamped 9R119xxx on the upper LEFT hand "Ear." The second E3 was from a Dearborn built car and was marked 9F110xxx on the upper RIGHT hand ear.

It appears that serial # stamping was much more common in the late 60's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T5 identification
  • 3054tony
  • May 16, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
473
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
138
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
140
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
135
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Electrical need help with a part number
  • alutwon
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
141
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2026
alutwon
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?