dg28182
Founding Member
d19 said:Thanks Man...
If I have major damage does he build new as well?
I believe so. I don't see why he wouldn't.
d19 said:Thanks Man...
If I have major damage does he build new as well?
*points at his mustang*d19 said:Thanks Man...
If I have major damage does he build new as well?
.......sometime.You see it there.Black with no front bumper and a R wing.Topstang2001 said:*points at his mustang*
New motor going in........sometime.You see it there.Black with no front bumper and a R wing.

I've read about being able to use spacers to give the strut more travel. I think the problem is you might have to clearance the hood. [EDIT] It looks like it will work fine since I'll be at stock ride height. People run into trouble when they lower their car with stock spindles and use the SN95 struts. Now the question is whether the valving is radically different between SN95s and Fox bodies. The SN95s are heavier up front so the springs must be different. Think the dampening will be off? [/EDIT]Glenn88lx said:If the strut body is the same length then the piston rod is what is longer. If that is the case you could use the C/C plate spacers to pull the rod up the difference in length and not lose any jounce travel.
tooler said:I've read about being able to use spacers to give the strut more travel. I think the problem is you might have to clearance the hood.
I guess I'm having trouble visualizing the effects of the spacers and how it changes things. But since I'll already be in there to install the c/c plates, for $20 it's worth a try.baglock1 said:That's exactly what the spacers are for. You use as few as possible under the spherical bearing to get as much bump travel as possible. Ideally this would be none of them. However, the hood must be taken into affect and so a few spacers may need to be used to lower the top of the strut into the wheel well. You want to give the hood just enough room to close and nothing more.
tooler said:I guess I'm having trouble visualizing the effects of the spacers and how it changes things. But since I'll already be in there to install the c/c plates, for $20 it's worth a try.
OrLackThereof said:I throw a gauge on it and I'm only pulling 10-12 hg's. That's REALLY poor. All the hoses are intact...so now I have to do a vacuum leak hunt. Probably just gonna bring it back and say "you put the motor in, you find out what you missed!"![]()
OrLackThereof said:I throw a gauge on it and I'm only pulling 10-12 hg's. That's REALLY poor. All the hoses are intact...so now I have to do a vacuum leak hunt. Probably just gonna bring it back and say "you put the motor in, you find out what you missed!"![]()
Looks really good Dave. I used to have tribars on mine too. Got tired of buying tires every year or so. So now I have the ugly '99 flat ponies.dg28182 said:Hey all, just thought I'd post a new pic of the car after I had waxed it and cleaned it up good.

baglock1 said:I'm borrowing a digital camera today. While I'm tinkering with it, I'll bust out my CC plates and give you a visual of the affects that the spacers have.
94_Teal_GT said:So now I have the ugly '99 flat ponies.![]()

94_Teal_GT said:But do any of you guys use chemical wheel cleaners?
baglock1 said:Ugly!?! Ugly?!?![]()
I use simple green and a sponge. It may not be recommended as I've never bothered to check, but it works exceptionally well.
baglock1 said:Ugly!?! Ugly?!?![]()
I use simple green and a sponge. It may not be recommended as I've never bothered to check, but it works exceptionally well.
You do know I meant the '99 base GT model 16" flat ponies aka '00 v6 ponies? You too can score a set w/ like new BFG tires for $395.00 at Stangparts.com
I guess I could try to fix up those waffles I have in the garage.
I'll have to check the bottle.Wolfhound said:Another vote for Simple Green. IT works great on my wheels.
94_Teal_GT said:Perhaps ugly wasn't the proper term. Beauty challenged?![]()
You do know I meant the '99 base GT model 16" flat ponies aka '00 v6 ponies?