• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

MM cc plates and Bilsteins

  • Thread starter Thread starter spade
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2008
S

spade

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2001
109
0
17
Atlanta, Ga
Jun 15, 2008
#1
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #1
So....I have a question...

After running with HR SSs and stock strut/shocks for 3 years my kidneys started to hurt so i purchased the new MM cc plates and Bilsteins along with poly isolators.

The MM directions and FAQs are a little vague when it comes to this combo, which seems strange since it's what they recommend. What I took from the directions and FAQ was not to use the MM bumpstop or the dustboot. It seemed to me the directions were saying install the cc plates as directed and then do nothing to the struts other than use the spacers on them and then install.

Ok, Im cool with that.

But, where I got confused is the section regarding the spacers:

For cars at stock ride height:
• Install 2 long spacers and 1 short spacer below the
spherical bearing. Install 1 short spacer above the
spherical bearing. There should be a total of 4 spac-
ers per side.

For lowered cars:
• For all other struts, install 1 short spacer below the
spherical bearing. Install 2 long and 1 short spacer
above the spherical bearing. There should be a total of
4 spacers per side.You may need to omit a spacer to fully engage the nut
on the strut shaft.

It does not seem to me the directions above include Bilsteins in to the equation.
When I followed the directions for lowered cars, a huge gap was left between the top of the strut and cc plate. If I tried jacking the control arm up any more it only lifted the car off of the jack stands. So I went with the stock directions....which seemed to fit perfectly BUT I'm not sure if this is correct.

I guess what I am asking is if you have a '99 (or around) mustang with MM cc and Bilsteins how many spacers and in what order did you use them.


As a side note, I'm kinda ticked because the car sits about 3/4" higher than it did before. I'm sure a portion of this is the poly isolators but 3/4"! The bottom lip of the fender now sits at 27". It use to be right over 26- 26.25". Which is why I'm wondering if I installed the spacers wrong.

Thanks for your help!
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 15, 2008
#2
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #2
post some pics. i'm not understanding your problem exactly
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jun 16, 2008
#3
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #3
I have MM cc plates and Bilsteins. The instructions say not to use the dust boots and bump stops because Bilstein dampers have integral bump stops and dust boots.

I used the spacer setup for "lowered" cars (in order to give my front suspension more travel before it hits the bump stops). You can mess around with the spacers to give optimal bump travel; the goal should be to get as much bump travel as possible without the tops of the struts hitting the hood.

As for the ride height issue, it's almost certainly caused by the isolators. The spacers on the strut have nothing to do with ride height when you're using regular springs (not coilovers).

I did the install myself, so if you have any more questions, feel free to ask in this thread or shoot me a PM.
 
S

spade

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2001
109
0
17
Atlanta, Ga
Jun 16, 2008
#4
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #4
OK...thanks!

I guess I will try again. Maybe I should have just kept jacking the control arm up.

Flghtmstr1: did you have any strut clearance issues with the hood?

I wish I had not thown away the original isolator...sigh

Thanks!
 

Jinx

I like cats, cats like me. Cats and I fully agree.
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 2, 2003
12,166
4,237
223
Cat Country
Jun 16, 2008
#5
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #5
Flghtmstr1 said:
I have MM cc plates and Bilsteins. The instructions say not to use the dust boots and bump stops because Bilstein dampers have integral bump stops and dust boots.

I used the spacer setup for "lowered" cars (in order to give my front suspension more travel before it hits the bump stops). You can mess around with the spacers to give optimal bump travel; the goal should be to get as much bump travel as possible without the tops of the struts hitting the hood.

As for the ride height issue, it's almost certainly caused by the isolators. The spacers on the strut have nothing to do with ride height when you're using regular springs (not coilovers).

I did the install myself, so if you have any more questions, feel free to ask in this thread or shoot me a PM.
Click to expand...

I have this same setup on my 03 (mm 4bolt cc plates, Bilsteins and Eibach pro-kit springs with stock isolators.) I had the work done at a shop, but they used the instructions/guide from MM. There is no hood clearance issue and the Bilsteins have their own internal stops.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jun 17, 2008
#6
  • Jun 17, 2008
  • #6
spade said:
Flghtmstr1: did you have any strut clearance issues with the hood?
Click to expand...

Yes, in fact. Unfortunately, I didn't find out until after the car was aligned (they barely cleared before the alignment, but the driver's side did not afterwards lol). It ended up "clearancing" the hood itself. I don't mind the gouges in the hood because i'm going to be getting a cobra r hood this summer. However, I mentioned the hood clearance thing as a warning to others, lest they repeat my mistake.
 

navarro98gt

Member
May 15, 2003
213
3
16
chicago, IL
Jun 17, 2008
#7
  • Jun 17, 2008
  • #7
Flghtmstr1 said:
Yes, in fact. Unfortunately, I didn't find out until after the car was aligned (they barely cleared before the alignment, but the driver's side did not afterwards lol). It ended up "clearancing" the hood itself. I don't mind the gouges in the hood because i'm going to be getting a cobra r hood this summer. However, I mentioned the hood clearance thing as a warning to others, lest they repeat my mistake.
Click to expand...

Oh man that sucks. Thats why I ended up going with Tokico Fox body struts as recommended by stangsuspension. They are one inch shorter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Suspensión Noise
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
359
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2026
PonyGTrider
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
238
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
438
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
266
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
1
For Sale 1995 Mustang GT Convertible FOR SALE
  • #16Stang
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
947
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 21, 2024
#16Stang
1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?