• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

MM&FF Redheaded step.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Outlaw97GT
  • Start date Start date Apr 12, 2006

Outlaw97GT

Member
Sep 10, 2005
234
0
16
Redneckville, Tx
Apr 12, 2006
#1
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys my suscriction went out on MM&FF's in Feb. I renewed it but missed the March issue.
What did I miss in March on the redheaded step child part 6?
It said they had 274rwhp before the spray, I missed something. Back in part 5 they said they had 240rwhp.

BTW it looks like us 96-98 guys are gonna have another series to follow...Beginner's Luck.


Keith
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Apr 12, 2006
#2
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #2
They had the stock non-PI heads ported and pulled the old motor out for a CHP built 4.6, and upgraded to more radical cams, i believe.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Apr 12, 2006
#3
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #3
i can tell you the moral of the story....

lose the stinkin NPI heads and make some real power.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Apr 12, 2006
#4
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #4
isn't idea of redheadded step child was buld it on budget? CHP block don't sound all that cheap to me
 

Outlaw97GT

Member
Sep 10, 2005
234
0
16
Redneckville, Tx
Apr 12, 2006
#5
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #5
mity2 said:
isn't idea of redheadded step child was buld it on budget? CHP block don't sound all that cheap to me
Click to expand...

Im thinking the same thing....
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Apr 12, 2006
#6
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #6
mity2 said:
isn't idea of redheadded step child was buld it on budget? CHP block don't sound all that cheap to me
Click to expand...
they realized with NPI heads and all the bolt-ons in the world, the car was still slow.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Apr 12, 2006
#7
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #7
helty said:
they realized with NPI heads and all the bolt-ons in the world, the car was still slow.
Click to expand...

+1

btw, my car is my own Project Redheaded stepchild
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Apr 12, 2006
#8
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #8
YEh true. I kept up with it until they got the block I was like - You just lost me lol.
 
G

GT02MG

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
49
0
0
MD
Apr 12, 2006
#9
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #9
They added a 100 shot of the juice and made like 370 some RWHP and 497 RWTQ....those should be almost correct the magazine is out in my car
 

Outlaw97GT

Member
Sep 10, 2005
234
0
16
Redneckville, Tx
Apr 13, 2006
#10
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #10
GT02MG said:
They added a 100 shot of the juice and made like 370 some RWHP and 497 RWTQ....those should be almost correct the magazine is out in my car
Click to expand...

I have that issue, that is in May's, I missed March's issue.
 

MineralMan

Active Member
May 17, 2005
146
76
38
San Diego, CA
Apr 14, 2006
#11
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #11
It was originally supposed to be on a budget. But like all project cars, things change. One issue (can't remember which one), there was an editorial written up about what they had done, the road blocks they encountered, and what was changing. From what I remember they have decided that they will soon do the PI swap. :-(
 

Bubba Z.

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
88
0
0
Tallahassee, FL
Apr 14, 2006
#12
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #12
Yup, they really lost track of their goal -- 300 HP keeping the non-PI heads and at the same time keeping it streetable.

Something this board knew a long time ago -- on the 96-'98 GTs go the PI route if you wanna stay NA.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Apr 15, 2006
#13
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #13
I too was very disappointed the track the RHSC took. Keeping budget and N/A NPI heads in mind, I would have liked to have seen them purchase a used set of NPI heads and self port (show how) combine with a set of VT stage I cams or stage II with springs. Then add bolt-ons i.e. (cheap) PI intake, full exhaust, CAI with Tbody and plenum, pulleys etc... This would keep goal of NPI heads and stay cheap. No PI parts seems a silly stance if it fits the budget to me.

Adding Nitrous in this latest issue?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Apr 15, 2006
#14
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #14
Funny... I was looking at the MM&FF issue the other day with the latest update on it I guess, and I read 300 N/A HP on a non pi GT, or something like that. I though, "well damn... if a non PI GT can do it, why do PI GT's have trouble getting over 300hp N/A..?" Then you guys say they added a shot of nitrous. That dissapointing. I dont like naaawwwzzzzz.
 

gtstangau

Member
Jan 9, 2006
133
0
16
Alabama
Apr 15, 2006
#15
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #15
Why is it most people with 96-98 GT's buy the P.I. heads for there cars. I realize the stock heads are junk, but why don't people buy like some better heads than what comes stock on a 99+. I would get some MPH heads or something if I was going through all the trouble. That way they could beat 99+ cars instead of spending all that money to have the same power.
 

Built98GT

New Member
Oct 17, 2005
211
0
0
OKC
Apr 15, 2006
#16
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #16
gtstangau said:
Why is it most people with 96-98 GT's buy the P.I. heads for there cars. I realize the stock heads are junk, but why don't people buy like some better heads than what comes stock on a 99+. I would get some MPH heads or something if I was going through all the trouble. That way they could beat 99+ cars instead of spending all that money to have the same power.
Click to expand...

They buy the stock pi heads because they are relatively cheap.In most cases you can get used pi heads for 300 bucks or around that price range.And doing a pi swap does not make a 96-98 car just have the same power, it gives them more power than stock 99+ gt's because it raises the compression.
 

Outlaw97GT

Member
Sep 10, 2005
234
0
16
Redneckville, Tx
Apr 15, 2006
#17
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #17
LI98GTStang said:
I too was very disappointed the track the RHSC took. Keeping budget and N/A NPI heads in mind, I would have liked to have seen them purchase a used set of NPI heads and self port (show how) combine with a set of VT stage I cams or stage II with springs. Then add bolt-ons i.e. (cheap) PI intake, full exhaust, CAI with Tbody and plenum, pulleys etc... This would keep goal of NPI heads and stay cheap. No PI parts seems a silly stance if it fits the budget to me.

Adding Nitrous in this latest issue?
Click to expand...

Well maybe the new project "Beginner's Luck" will go a better way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread 1994 Free Mustang Budget Build - Project Maui Cruiser
  • Justin Fetalvero
  • Mar 7, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 20, 2021
General karthief
Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
9
  • Locked
Expired 94gt Bolt Ons Nj $1000
  • 95PGTTech
  • Dec 19, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
11K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 19, 2013
95PGTTech
9
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?