• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Modded 95 vrs Modded 05 Dyno Results Inside

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#1
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #1
I guess by now, its no secret to most of you that ...... I don't like mod motors.

Main reason is their lack of low end torque.

I was reading the October 5.0 rag which has lots of mod motor stuff in it, just like the other issues they put out ...... but we won't go there.

They had an 05 with JBA lt's & off road h-pipe, Dynomax mufflers, and pulleys. On page 131 you see an article where they install a CMRC delete kit and give the results of the gain with a pull showing chart and numeric rw hp/tq values.

I was kinda sorta impressed by their results and thought to myself ...

What would that modded 05 look like next to my modded 95 which I consider to be typical of the average bolt on 94-95 Stang. I say this to point out that this post is not all about ...... just my car.

I have an Excell file that I built which allows me to easily compare combos to mine and each other.

I plugged in the Mighty Mod Motored 05 in the rag and put it next to my humble combo to see what was what.

The differences are not as much as I expected in the higher rpm range but still, the low end is pretty soft on the 05. It doesn't make 300lbs of torque until 3500rm.

I had the opportunity to drive an 05 stick car shortly after they came out and it was a real Bow Wow Dog until you got the revs to mid range or slightly higher. At that point it would really move for sure.

Everything else about the 05 I absolutely love btw.

I guess Ford has found the right solution for the mod motors lack luster low end performance. Put a positive displacement blower on it to prop up the low end.

Final thoughts ......

PUSHRODS FOREVER

Anyway ...... you can see a modded 95 and 05 next to each other which make close to the same peak numbers.

Later
Grady

 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 28, 2005
#2
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #2
Nice post

The 05 did better than I thought it would...I like them even more now. Nice curves on both.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Aug 28, 2005
#3
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #3
i was talking to patrick about a 98 cobra, and most 98 cobra owners will put 4.30's or 4.56 gears in because of the incredible lack of bottom end. The 4v motor is a good engine...but i dont think i could give up the low end of the 5.0 for the high end of a 4.6
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#4
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #4
5spd GT said:
Nice post

The 05 did better than I thought it would...I like them even more now. Nice curves on both.
Click to expand...

I thought this might be interesting to some of the peeps on this site as I know many, like you, see the mod motors from a different view point than myself.

Ever since I was a kid of about 16 and drove my first big block motored car I was hooked on low end torque.

I saw in that same mag that lt's for that 05 came with a price tag of about
$1100

I don't think I can afford to mod an 05

Later
Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#5
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #5
final5-0 said:
I saw in that same mag that lt's for that 05 came with a price tag of about
$1100

I don't think I can afford to mod an 05

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

Nice little writeup Grady.

Even the midpipes for an 05 cost more than $300, some were upwards of $400!! For a CATLESS midpipe!! No thanks.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 28, 2005
#6
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #6
The prices will drop...just like it always works. Just check back in a few years:

mattihiasj - I will have to disagree...I have friends with 4v's whether it be mystic 96 Cobra's or 03 cobra's or 04 mach 1. They get gears to keep them in the power making band.

I don't see them having a lack of lowend torque just a lot of higher end power.

final50 - I love my torque as well...look at my parts. 165's instead of 185's/Performer instead of RPM/Custom cam instead of high revver/65mm TB instead of bigger TB...etc.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 28, 2005
#7
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #7
Nice write Grady
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 28, 2005
#8
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #8
Good stuff. Those 3v motors are pretty impressive. They make real good power for such few mods.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#9
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #9
yellow1995Cobra said:
Good stuff. Those 3v motors are pretty impressive. They make real good power for such few mods.
Click to expand...

I think so as well.

I do wanna make if clear that the 05 really was snappy but you had to have quite a few revs on it before that kind of thing was felt.

I don't know about the rest of you but when I'm cruising around town and want some push me back in the seat kind of power I want it at those cruising speeds and I don't wanna have to wait for it.

Or in other words I don't wanna have to drive around town with the motor at a high rpm level like some kind of 2 stroke to be in the position for some instant power.

Later
Grady
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 28, 2005
#10
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #10
No low end torque? Can I put my dyno up against that one...?



J/K. I agree with you, the N/A 4.6L motors, especially the DOHC ones, have a real problem with low-end grunt.

Dave
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#11
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #11
Rootus said:
No low end torque? Can I put my dyno up against that one...?



J/K. I agree with you, the N/A 4.6L motors, especially the DOHC ones, have a real problem with low-end grunt.

Dave
Click to expand...

I was just waiting for you to say something Dave.

You got the best of both worlds with your new ride.

Later
Grady
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Aug 29, 2005
#12
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #12
Exhaust&pulleys versus
FTI AFR 165's & cam, Edel rpm, Mac lt's & cat pipe, Tweecer tune

Ain't evolution a b***h.

Thanks for a neat comparison.
 

ROLLIN5.0

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
135
0
0
Tulsa, OK
Aug 29, 2005
#13
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #13
It's just a bigger import motor if you ask me. Even though I am in love with the looks of the S197, I probably won't ever own another "modular" motor after this Expy is gone, which really sucks because that means my cars/trucks are going to get older and older, or I'm gonna have to switch brands eventually .
Brandon
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Aug 29, 2005
#14
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #14
I like the pull up top, I do miss my low end grunt of my old 98 GT. I don't drag race so I'm not missing much with the tq down low

ps: i'd rather your car than the 05
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 29, 2005
#15
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #15
tomustang said:
I like the pull up top, I do miss my low end grunt of my old 98 GT. I don't drag race so I'm not missing much with the tq down low

ps: i'd rather your car than the 05
Click to expand...
huh? the 96-98's have like the worst low end grunt of them all.

did you mean 95?

With a K/B and H/C/I, we can have the best of both worlds too ...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 29, 2005
#16
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #16
BlackVert said:
With a K/B and H/C/I, we can have the best of both worlds too ...
Click to expand...

I've had that very same thought for quite some time now

I'm making the plans and mapping my route to .....................


Zilla Dilla City

Later
Grady
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 29, 2005
#17
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #17
BlackVert said:
huh? the 96-98's have like the worst low end grunt of them all.

did you mean 95?

With a K/B and H/C/I, we can have the best of both worlds too ...
Click to expand...

The 96-98's have the same torque rating as the 94/95's. 285hp but it is 100rpm higher up.

Me and a buddy of mine did a race with a 98 gt (catback, 5spd) against a 94 gt (not really optioned out 5spd) and went from a 5mph roll (to take out driver factor as much as possible). The 98 gt started pulling immediately. Put almost a car and a half to 70mph. The 98 gt had 3:27's (factory) and the 94 has 3:08's. The guy in the 94 is actually a slightly better driver than the guy that was in the 98. Alls they had to do was shift once (on purpose). Both gave a nice chirp.

I knew the 98 would take it but I had to prove a point

They are driver's races...
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 29, 2005
#18
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #18
final5-0 said:
I've had that very same thought for quite some time now

I'm making the plans and mapping my route to .....................


Zilla Dilla City

Later
Grady
Click to expand...
me too, the guy who bought my turbo setup has a k/b getting rebuilt. he is considering selling it to me for the money he paid for the turbo.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 29, 2005
#19
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #19
5spd GT said:
I knew the 98 would take it but I had to prove a point
Click to expand...
It's usually the other way around.

In my experience, a Fox body GT will just edge out a 94/95 GT, it'll be a rear-bumper to front-bumper kinda thing up to about 100. And a 94/95 GT will typically be about that much quicker than a 96-98 GT. All of this is stock for stock. And I exclude the Fox body LX's because they were definitely lighter. The Fox GT with full body cladding was actually pretty piggy, not as far off from a SN95 as some people might think. I've owned all of these cars and I've had many an opportunity to compare them to other stock Mustangs of various years.

But you're right about it all being a drivers race for the most part. I've seen cars lose with 50+ horsepower advantages .

Dave
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 30, 2005
#20
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #20
Rootus said:
It's usually the other way around.

In my experience, a Fox body GT will just edge out a 94/95 GT, it'll be a rear-bumper to front-bumper kinda thing up to about 100. And a 94/95 GT will typically be about that much quicker than a 96-98 GT. All of this is stock for stock. And I exclude the Fox body LX's because they were definitely lighter. The Fox GT with full body cladding was actually pretty piggy, not as far off from a SN95 as some people might think. I've owned all of these cars and I've had many an opportunity to compare them to other stock Mustangs of various years.

But you're right about it all being a drivers race for the most part. I've seen cars lose with 50+ horsepower advantages .

Dave
Click to expand...

The 98's weigh very comparable to the 94/95's. The 98 has a steeper gear and more power (225hp). It isn't hard to guess why it won. I see them both as driver's races. Almost exactly...i'm around these cars a lot and get in the "racing scene" and see this time after time. Consistent.

I know that foxes don't weigh that much less than a sn95. My lx weighs 3,180lbs without me in it. My friends "loaded" 2000 Gt with 17x9 chrome wheels weighs 3,337lbs. A 150lb difference. Not much at all. Many say they weigh so much which is not true. My 2000 Gt weighed less than his...almost in the 3,2xx range. Same 17x9 chrome wheels. We weighed that 94 gt that raced the 98 gt weighed 3,380lbs with close to a full tank. The other cars I mentioned were at 1/2 tank.
My friends 90 gt weighed less than my lx. Just because it is a 99+ or lx doesn't mean it is heavier or lighter just by the year or base name. The 05's weigh around 34/3500 lbs (gt coupes). A recent thread over there showed this when people started posting their weights. They are all pretty close in how I see it. Much nicer now-a-days though.

Yeah I've beat cars with over 100rwhp over me... Bad drivers...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
115
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
O
Progress Thread LTD-ing
  • OX1
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
334
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2026
OX1
O
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
694
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
549
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?