• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

MOTORWEEK review of Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kingelvis
  • Start date Start date Oct 5, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kingelvis

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
2
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#1
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #1
I'm not a regular poster, and not even a Ford person really, but I watched last night's edition of "MOTORWEEK" with Jon Davis and crew and was amazed at how much they fawned over the car.

Craig Singhoff is a big muscle/Mustang fan so he had to love it, but the text of the review sounded about as positive as ANY review I've ever seen on the show.

They seemed to think the solid axle wasn't 'crude' at all - it does have a panhard rod and a differential link to eliminate axle hop. They had absolutely nothing bad to say about the axle. Frankly, I think it's fine too.

Acceleration numbers were only for 0-60mph (five seconds flat) and the 3 valve engine has boosted power to be more than competitive with other domestic V8s.

They raved over handling too, but it was in the looks department that the MOTORWEEK crew really flipped. Davis ALWAYS SOUNDS LIKE HE'S YELLING, but in this case he really did seem amped up with enthusiasm in describing the true to 1960s side scoops, trisegment taillights and fastback roof.

I like the way he ended the review by talking about how this could be the kind of car that could end the SUV monoculture - a nice zesty taste of sport and fun in comparison to the dour, wallowing (when not tipping over) SUV.

The Verdict: Ford has an out of the park grand slam with the new Mustang.

I'm kind of partial to the new Charger, but for $5000 less, I'd be crazy to pass up the (much better looking/honest to god 2 door) Mustang GT.

Think about it, the hot to trot Neon SRT is $22,000 - for not much more you can have an honest to God supercar

Thank you FoMoCo.
 
P

PONY XPRESS

New Member
Jun 15, 2004
143
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#2
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #2
New Charger is a 4 door, don't see much comparison there.

Their was a Neon Troll on this board a while back, I guess his mother called him for dinner.
 
M

midnighttorch

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
45
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#3
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #3
i'm sold buy an "05" mustang gt!!!

MT mag said auto ran 0-60 5.1 & 1/4mile 13.6 / tv said 5.0(flat). & they said a 5 speed should run 0-60 4.8-4.9 & 1/4 who knows 13.4est!! That's damn good! from what i read early on in summer it had best 13.8est because of the weight but from what i'm hearing now 13.6 from a auto wow! If this is true that a 5 speed will run mid 13s or better when they hit the streets i'm sold! mid oct. can't wait!
 
C

cnash

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
3
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#4
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #4
midnighttorch said:
MT mag said auto ran 0-60 5.1 & 1/4mile 13.6 / tv said 5.0(flat). & they said a 5 speed should run 0-60 4.8-4.9 & 1/4 who knows 13.4est!! That's damn good! from what i read early on in summer it had best 13.8est because of the weight but from what i'm hearing now 13.6 from a auto wow! If this is true that a 5 speed will run mid 13s or better when they hit the streets i'm sold! mid oct. can't wait!
Click to expand...
Not to mention it's faster than the 390 hp 04 Cobra =)
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Oct 5, 2004
#5
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #5
cnash said:
Not to mention it's faster than the 390 hp 04 Cobra =)
Click to expand...

2004 Cobra specs:

General Information
Price: $--,---
Miles Per Gallon: 16/24 mpg
Curb Weight: 3665 lbs
Layout: Front-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Engine
Type: Supercharged V8
Displacement: 4601 cc
Horsepower: 390 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 390 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
Redline: 6500 rpm
Performance
0-60 mph: 4.5 sec
0-100 mph: 10.4 sec
Quarter Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mph
Skidpad: .90g
Top Speed: 155 mph (limited)
Braking, 60-0 mph: --- ft
Slalom Speed: --.- mph
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Oct 5, 2004
#6
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #6
HAHAHAHA faster than an 04 cobra.

You'll be waiting for the 06 cobra for a mustang faster.

kirkyg
 

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Oct 5, 2004
#7
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #7
cnash said:
Not to mention it's faster than the 390 hp 04 Cobra =)
Click to expand...
 
C

cnash

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
3
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#8
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #8
stock 04 cobras are about .2 secs faster in the 1/4 and 0-60.
Btw ford has announced they will not be making a new cobra they are making a GR-1 instead.
Also the cobra is supercharged as the 05 gt is not.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Oct 5, 2004
#9
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #9
GR-1? I thought that was equivalent to a ford GT which is a 100k+ car. The cobra will be made as will the new lightning...i dont know where your getting your info but its wrong.

kirkyg
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Oct 5, 2004
#10
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #10
cnash said:
stock 04 cobras are about .2 secs slower in the 1/2 and 0-60.
Btw ford has announced they will not be making a new cobra they are making a GR-1 instead.
Also the cobra is supercharged as the 05 gt is not.
Click to expand...
Actually Ford hasnt announced that, maybe you should stop making **** up. It's already known SVT is developing another Mustang Cobra.

And no, stock 04 Cobras are a stable mid 12 sec car that easily dips into low 12's, and can you name a track that you can race a 1/2 mile on?

BTW, Why dont you let us know what the GR-1 is.. You are speaking about the Shelby GR-1 concept correct? Which Ford has released no information about putting into production as of right now.
 
M

Matt Gruber

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
50
0
0
New Smyrna Beach FL
Oct 6, 2004
#11
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #11
kingelvis
they gush about every car they test. look up their test of the 74, i bet they loved it.
I will test drive them myself and form my own opinion. It does LOOK good i admit. I'll also be reading stangnet to see stories from early buyers. "ask the man that OWNS one" (old packard slogan)
 
K

Kingelvis

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
2
0
0
Oct 6, 2004
#12
  • Oct 6, 2004
  • #12
This time they seemed particularly ga ga - even more than usual.

I've never owned a Ford (only an AMC Rebel that used Ford's C-4 automatic and the electrical system) but the new Mustang is pretty darn tempting.

My lease will be up in 2005 and the Mustang is currently at the top of my list as a new car because of:

1. Classic supercar appearance

2. 300hp

3. Evidently, it will be the lowest priced V8 performance car in the US.

4. Rear seat is actually usuable for passengers

5. Sized just right for practicality/room compromise

I must say that I'm a bit surprised some seem sad to see the old Fox Mustang go. They were fast - posting 14 second e.t.s bone stock as early as 1985 but they were always much uglier than the Camaro.

The T-Bird was major flop - should have been a four seater and sold for less money - like the 1983 Vintage which re-established the T-Bird rep after the god-awful '80.

This Mustang, however is the tonic Ford needs (and needs badly) to bounce back.

Now they just need to stretch the wheelbase and give us an honest to god Torino fastback intermediate as the Nascar flagship to replace the prosaic Taurus.
 
F

Fox44ever

New Member
Dec 14, 2005
7
0
2
Jan 7, 2006
#13
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #13
Whoa... calm down there.

Torino...? Is there anyone other than die hard Ford fans who would even know what that was?

I like the 68-69 Fairlane/Torino too... but there's no way Ford will ever recreate it.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jan 7, 2006
#14
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #14
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jan 7, 2006
#15
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #15
Fox44ever said:
Whoa... calm down there.

Torino...? Is there anyone other than die hard Ford fans who would even know what that was?

I like the 68-69 Fairlane/Torino too... but there's no way Ford will ever recreate it.
Click to expand...


Whoa...don't bring a thread back to life after a year of dormancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
650
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
447
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
522
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?