• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need feedback on my list of parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter SuxToBeMyTires
  • Start date Start date Oct 14, 2011
S

SuxToBeMyTires

New Member
Jun 15, 2004
10
0
0
Oct 14, 2011
#1
  • Oct 14, 2011
  • #1
I've retired my 89 5.0 to the garage to do some work and wanted to check up and see if my choice of parts will work well together. I'm looking for a nice street car. I don't need a track car that can run 10s, most likely won't ever take it to the track, so just a ballsy cruiser I guess I could say. Some of these things are already on the car, but most I have still to get:

MAC shorty headers (already have on the car)
MAC exhaust from headers back (already on the car)
BBK Fenderwell cold air intake (already on the car)
BBK off-road H Pipe
Ported E7 heads (maybe GT40s if funds allow, but probably not)
e303 cam
1.7 rockers
New lifters
8.8 3.73 rear conversion
Cobra Intake (figured this was all i needed with the stock e7s)
(not sure which size throttle body)

My list evolves around my own choices and also my budget of course. There is more to this list such as ignition, new underdrive pullies, etc. It is open for critique since I have knowledge, but I'm not a technician/mechanic and this will be my first major project with my car.
 
N

nibik91

Member
May 12, 2010
51
0
6
Oct 14, 2011
#2
  • Oct 14, 2011
  • #2
what made you choose an e cam? a cam and 3.73 and a intake and you will have all the fun you need.
 
N

nibik91

Member
May 12, 2010
51
0
6
Oct 14, 2011
#3
  • Oct 14, 2011
  • #3
an by all the fun you need i mean for now hahaha
 
S

SuxToBeMyTires

New Member
Jun 15, 2004
10
0
0
Oct 15, 2011
#4
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #4
from what i've been reading what ppl are saying, an e cam is a great balance between low end power and street worthiness. I looked at the B cam and i was seeing that u lost some low end to gain top end. On the street, for me at least, low end is more desirable. Correct me if i'm wrong though.

So is this a good list or should I be making some changes? And what I mean by changes is staying within the same price range, not adding $1500 heads, etc., lol
 

Bryan83taco

Active Member
Feb 4, 2003
554
40
39
SF Bay
Oct 15, 2011
#5
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #5
Don't even waste your time and money on ported E7's. For the money it will cost you to freshen up/port the E7's you can have GT40's. But if you search hard you can find some used aluminum heads for only a couple hundred more over the GT40's. And a 65 or 70mm throttle body should be fine.

I know it may be out of the budget but if your gonna do a H/C/I swap, you might as well put some good flowing parts in there the first time. The HP bug will bite you sooner or later and ported E7/GT40's can only give you so much.

Just my $.02
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 15, 2011
#6
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #6
I just don't know why people waste their time with FRPP letter cams anymore. There are much better off-the-shelf offerings out there these days. Comp's XE line and AFM to name a few. The letter cams are completely obsolete anymore.

And I agree, don't waste time porting the E7s. Don't spend a dime on them. Save up your money for a better set of heads and swap them out when you can.
 
R

Ratchet27

New Member
Sep 25, 2011
17
0
1
Midwest
Oct 15, 2011
#7
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #7
I agree about the heads. I wouldnt waste your time with ported E7's. I probably wouldnt even go with the GT-40's. I would wait till you could a nice pair of used aluminum heads.
 

RAYZEN CAINE

Member
Feb 1, 2007
51
0
7
Oct 15, 2011
#8
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #8
To the OP you can save alot of time and money by just installing the

B-CAM

10 out of 10 times the B cam FTW!!!!























 
S

SuxToBeMyTires

New Member
Jun 15, 2004
10
0
0
Oct 15, 2011
#9
  • Oct 15, 2011
  • #9
Well i'll spring for the better heads then. Would rather do it right instead of trying to save a few bucks. Whats a nice mild cam that is street worthy but still gives me a nice idle and hp gain over stock if not one of the letter cams?
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
Oct 16, 2011
#10
  • Oct 16, 2011
  • #10
Depending on the cam you select, 1.6 roller rockers may be the better choice. On the cam, something around 0.500 lift and 220 duration at 0.050 will give you a decent idle and nice pick up in power. A decent set of aluminum heads should be first on the list, but combined with the other parts, may drive you to needing larger injectors and fuel pump. Your lifters may not need replaced; i reused mine for the first rebuild, with a new cam at the time. Have you replaced the mass air flow sensor as well?
 
S

SuxToBeMyTires

New Member
Jun 15, 2004
10
0
0
Oct 16, 2011
#11
  • Oct 16, 2011
  • #11
I see. No I have not replaced the mass air flow sensor since the only actual engine work done to the car as of now is just a cold air intake system.
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
Oct 16, 2011
#12
  • Oct 16, 2011
  • #12
I remember first doing things to my car, and first on the list were full exhaust, including headers, pullies, 1.7 roller rockers, mass air flow sensor, and finally the intake. Each item made a noticeable difference, but when the car really got fun was when I did the heads (and cam, ignition, injectors, and fuel pump), along with the suspension work. I recently went form the 306 to a 369, replaced darn near eveything (to bigger sizes), and that made another huge leap in power. If you research each step before you buy, you will notice the performance difference from each item you put on your car. Good luck!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 17, 2011
#13
  • Oct 17, 2011
  • #13
reldla1996 said:
On the cam, something around 0.500 lift and 220 duration at 0.050 will give you a decent idle and nice pick up in power.
Click to expand...

Ohhhh, you can do better than that. With a good set of heads, I would consider .550" a minimum lift for both I&E. Duration @ .050" between 215 and 220 for the intake and 225-230 for the exhaust. LSA around 112. That would be a nice street cam.
 

Pod

Member
Aug 17, 2003
71
0
6
Cambridge, UK
Oct 17, 2011
#14
  • Oct 17, 2011
  • #14
I'd add full length subframe connectors and decent lower control arms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
137
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
306
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?