• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Need to Know - What Year Cobra To Buy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TripleBlack95
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2006

TripleBlack95

Member
Dec 14, 2003
153
1
16
Burke (Fairfax), VA
Aug 20, 2006
#1
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #1
Seriously.

After looking at her for a 2nd time tonight, there's not a snowballs chance in hell she's getting repaired.

What year is the best Cobra? I'm going for the Cobra Vert, probably not triple black, which f**king blows my you know what, but it depends on whats available in my area.

The 95's don't have the hood/bumper, which makes them look like ass. Lets be honest here. I don't feel like buying the extra mods. But the 96-98 have the 4.6's - so you know. I need the pro's and con's from the pro's - and I wanted to go to you guys first before the Cobra heads.

I'm not getting another GT vert. It's pretty much economics when I can buy a Cobra Vert with 50K for the same price. Not worth my time to look at GT's. Granted I've been on a bender all night and for the next 2 days - but bear with me here. I need opinions!

Any help is appreciated. Because this truck absolutley f**king blows. Are you serious. I'm driving a truck right now.

- Andrew
 

SVT3183

Member
Mar 30, 2005
180
0
16
S Jersey
Aug 20, 2006
#2
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #2
I think the short answer is that the 96-98 are faster off the bat but modding them costs an arm and a leg compared to a 94-95. It's a tough question. My bro has a 96 and it's nice but i think i'd stick with my 95. It could come down to the best deal you can find.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Aug 20, 2006
#3
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #3
TripleBlack95 said:
Seriously.


The 95's don't have the hood/bumper, which makes them look like ass.
- Andrew
Click to expand...


They do have the reg. gt/v6 hood but they do have the cobra front bumper as the 96-98's do, unless you think not having the cobra letters on the rear bumper is bad and looks like ass?

Buddy of mine has a 96 cobra and the only mod motor I would buy is a 4v and only without selling my pushord 5.0. 96-98's are nice...you may be able to find a good priced 99/01 cobra though as well.

In the end for the money and if you want to mod it...go pushrod.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Aug 20, 2006
#4
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #4
your going to get biased opinions here for the most part, we like push rods, cheaper to mod and easier to mod. 95 cobra imo, but if you want fast stock and dont plan to mod any 96-98 cobra.
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Aug 20, 2006
#5
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #5
The 96-98 has more power to start with. they have really good blocks, I think their weak point is their pistons. I would probably go with a 96-98 over a 94-95. Those 4v seem really nice.
 

TripleBlack95

Member
Dec 14, 2003
153
1
16
Burke (Fairfax), VA
Aug 20, 2006
#6
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #6
Thanks for the responses - still debating. I think ideally if I could find a 95 I would snag it up - better potential. We'll see what I find this week!
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Aug 20, 2006
#7
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #7
i love them all, but its a lot easier to work on my cobra than it was my gt.
 

68torinogt

Hey guys, guess what--I have a bi-pass!!!
Mar 21, 2006
0
0
53
Welcome my son, welcome to the machine
Aug 20, 2006
#8
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #8
if you get a chance i want to see the wrecked one even though there are people who wouldnt agree.
pictures would be appreciated
plus i would go with the 4.6
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 21, 2006
#9
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #9
Well it all depends on where you want to take this car power wise.

If you want much over the 300fwhp mark of the 96-98 cobra, a blower will get you there, and they take to blowers very well. Turbo's as well. That would be one hella fast car.

But if you don't want to get a blower, but you want to get at least 300 to the wheels, you need an aftermarket h/c/i cobra, which means you might as well just buy a damn GT cause they are cheap. And you are going to ditch the heads anyway, so GT all the way.

Another thing to consider is there are tons of aftermarket hoods and body kits. Take a look, cause if you find a hood or a kit you like even more than the cobra look, then again, GT all the way.
Scott
 

yellowstang1994

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
338
0
0
Aug 21, 2006
#10
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #10
Personally i'd go with the 96-98 cobra even though I love the 94-95 cobras. It looks like there is a decent amount of bolt-ons you can do to them and you're starting out with the faster car. For the price of H/C/I on the 94-95 you could easily buy a supercharger for the 96-98. My friend had a 95 cobra and it wasn't a whole heck of a lot faster than a gt. Correct me if i'm wrong, and I know theres diff. driver's out there but he was running mid 14s stock?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 21, 2006
#11
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #11
mo_dingo said:
Well it all depends on where you want to take this car power wise.

If you want much over the 300fwhp mark of the 96-98 cobra, a blower will get you there, and they take to blowers very well. Turbo's as well. That would be one hella fast car.

But if you don't want to get a blower, but you want to get at least 300 to the wheels, you need an aftermarket h/c/i cobra, which means you might as well just buy a damn GT cause they are cheap. And you are going to ditch the heads anyway, so GT all the way.

Another thing to consider is there are tons of aftermarket hoods and body kits. Take a look, cause if you find a hood or a kit you like even more than the cobra look, then again, GT all the way.
Scott
Click to expand...

I concur......
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Aug 21, 2006
#12
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #12
yellowstang1994 said:
Personally i'd go with the 96-98 cobra even though I love the 94-95 cobras. It looks like there is a decent amount of bolt-ons you can do to them and you're starting out with the faster car. For the price of H/C/I on the 94-95 you could easily buy a supercharger for the 96-98. My friend had a 95 cobra and it wasn't a whole heck of a lot faster than a gt. Correct me if i'm wrong, and I know theres diff. driver's out there but he was running mid 14s stock?
Click to expand...


i think stock the gt's ran 14.9's-14.7's and the cobra ran 14.3's -14.1's 5spd for the gt that is
 

Lyncher

New Member
Jun 14, 2005
434
0
0
Aug 21, 2006
#13
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #13
Mustangless said:
The 96-98 has more power to start with. they have really good blocks, I think their weak point is their pistons. I would probably go with a 96-98 over a 94-95. Those 4v seem really nice.
Click to expand...

I agree...the 4v 4.6s are great, however its tough to get anywhere under 12s n/a. But the 96-98s have the Teksid all aluminum blocks which can handle well over 1000rwhp. A turbo 96-98 with cams (which are like 1500$) could easily put down 700+ rwhp and thats with stock heads and intake and all that crap. Now granted a good turbo kit is gonna run 5-6k the results are definatly worth it.
 

TripleBlack95

Member
Dec 14, 2003
153
1
16
Burke (Fairfax), VA
Aug 24, 2006
#14
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #14
Good responses guys. I've been really active on SVTperformance as of late in the classifieds.

Right now I've got two Cobra Vert's (96-98) I'll be heading down to North/South Carolina to look at. One I'm already all about - once the finances get worked out I'm gone.

I'll post wreckage pics in another thread today. I will be selling almost EVERYTHING from the car once its stored at a friends house.
 

red ink

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
746
1
0
Arizona
Aug 25, 2006
#15
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #15
To bad the 96-98 spoilers look like crap.
I like my 95. The v6 hood isnt obnoxious with bigass FAKE scoops. And the v6 bumper screams sleeper. Dont forget- horizontal tail lights. PRICELESS
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Aug 27, 2006
#16
  • Aug 27, 2006
  • #16
I would go with the 96-98 hands down. After learning about some of the 4v potential I wish I would have gotten a 4v.

Dustin
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Aug 27, 2006
#17
  • Aug 27, 2006
  • #17
wytstang said:
I concur......
Click to expand...

i concur the concurance......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
201
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
139
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?