• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Negative Wedge Kits

  • Thread starter Thread starter EP429
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2008

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Sep 29, 2008
#1
  • Sep 29, 2008
  • #1
I was just wondering which kit and from where all of you who have done this mod got yours. My ball joints need replaced, so now the little lady won't notice. Besides, I'm doing this "So it doesn't do it again"
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Sep 30, 2008
#2
  • Sep 30, 2008
  • #2
on the street with street tires a negative wedge kit wont get you much. the shelby drop,solid strut bar, and a set of roller perches are about all you need for the street IMO
 
Reactions: Mendezinc

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Sep 30, 2008
#3
  • Sep 30, 2008
  • #3
Ditto. My car is the lowest vintage Mustang I've seen around here and with the 1" drop (free) A-arms, it doesn't even come close to running out of ball joint travel. Save your money for something that makes a difference and you'll be happier.
 
Reactions: Mendezinc

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Oct 1, 2008
#4
  • Oct 1, 2008
  • #4
Wedge kits are a waste of money.
If you need a wedge kit, you need better control arms.
 
Reactions: Mendezinc

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Oct 1, 2008
#5
  • Oct 1, 2008
  • #5
I'm glad I asked first I'm a virgin to suspension mods.
So for the Shelby drop, just pop couple of holes under the originals or do I need a template for this?
 
Reactions: Mendezinc
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Oct 1, 2008
#6
  • Oct 1, 2008
  • #6
DazeCars, Shelby Drop, Klaus Arning drop, upper control arm drop, Falcon, Mustang, Cougar 60-70


FTW Racing - Fabricated To Win
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Oct 1, 2008
#7
  • Oct 1, 2008
  • #7
Just a little FYI, on '67 and up Fords, your new set of holes should make a perfect rectangle with the old set, just one-inch lower. The one shown at the top of thekid760's link shows a '65-'66 car which moves the holes front-to-back (or is it back-to-front?) and does NOT form a rectangle with square corners. Also, don't use a 17/32" bit, instead used a 1/2" bit and measure carefully. It may not sound like much, but that extra 1/32" of slop can allow the A-arm mounts to move slightly, which will make the holes a lot bigger than 17/32" in a hurry once that starts.
 
Reactions: Mendezinc

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Oct 2, 2008
#8
  • Oct 2, 2008
  • #8
zookeeper said:
a '65-'66 car which moves the holes front-to-back (or is it back-to-front?) and does NOT form a rectangle with square corners.
Click to expand...

We call those parallelograms.

65-6 1 inch down and 1/8 inch towards the rear.
67+ 1 inch down

opentrackerracingproducts.com also has a template.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 9, 2008
#9
  • Oct 9, 2008
  • #9
i would not say that the wedge kits are worthless or a waste of money at all, especially for the time they were designed and originally made. Opentracker and Maier accomplish the exact same thing by cutting a wedge out of the stock UCA's and rewelding them and Global West and other incorporate the different angle into their control arms. the Pro Motorsports wedge kits are just a more cost effective way of accomplishing this.

however, for a street car you probably won't ever need the wedge kits or re-angled control arms and the 1" control arn drop should be adequate. if you are building a street/track or even a serious street canyon carver then the wedge kits or re-angled control arms would be beneficial but only if you are dropping the control arms more than 1", usually 1.5"-1.75" is the amount you would drop the control arms with the wedge or re-angled control arms.
 
Reactions: Mendezinc

Mendezinc

Member
Feb 14, 2020
6
1
13
90604
Feb 21, 2021
#10
  • Feb 21, 2021
  • #10
This is an old post but informative, Thank You. I’ve been searching for info and advice, found too much unnecessary work or pathways.
The tip on the 17/32 bit, YES - so true! I recently discovered the issue. A sharp step bit with the largest step being 1/2” - you’re good. Take your time. Worked for me.

If any of you are still willing to offer more frontend tips . . . I’m listening.
Thanks Again

Mendezinc
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 23, 2021
#11
  • Feb 23, 2021
  • #11
Mendezinc said:
This is an old post but informative, Thank You. I’ve been searching for info and advice, found too much unnecessary work or pathways.
The tip on the 17/32 bit, YES - so true! I recently discovered the issue. A sharp step bit with the largest step being 1/2” - you’re good. Take your time. Worked for me.

If any of you are still willing to offer more frontend tips . . . I’m listening.
Thanks Again

Mendezinc
Click to expand...

Old post...but I found when doing the drop you really do want a 17/32 bit...1/2" makes it a real fight to install the UCAs, ended up slightly damaging the threads on my UCA bolts...not that it matters since they only on there temporarily to be able to roll the car around till I get the new suspension.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 23, 2021
#12
  • Feb 23, 2021
  • #12
Do your layout work carefully and 1/2" is fine. I cringe when I see people over-size holes to make up for the wrong location, especially on front end components.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 24, 2021
#13
  • Feb 24, 2021
  • #13
zookeeper said:
Do your layout work carefully and 1/2" is fine. I cringe when I see people over-size holes to make up for the wrong location, especially on front end components.
Click to expand...
I used a steel template from Street or Track...the layout was fine,but 1/2" makes it easy to damage the threads(....at least when I re-installed the OEM 50+ year old I6 UCAs) 17/32" is the right size. In reality, 1/32" isnt going to make any difference...even 1/16" large isnt likely to do anything, always assuming its correctly torqued down, not that you SHOULD go larger than absolutely needed.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Apr 20, 2021
#14
  • Apr 20, 2021
  • #14
Bolt holes with a slip fit are always drilled slightly larger than the fastener anyway. You can't have a 0.500" bolt going into a 0.500" hole or it's zero clearance...which means interference fit. There has to be some allowance for bolt hole position tolerace as well. You could use a 33/64" if you really wanted to, but that makes the hole positioning more critical.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 20, 2021
#15
  • Apr 20, 2021
  • #15
I've only been a machinist a few decades so I don't know everything. However I do know that a 1/2" drill bit will drill .001-.004 oversize which is plenty to put a half inch bolt (that typically measures .003-.005 undersize) into.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Apr 20, 2021
#16
  • Apr 20, 2021
  • #16
I'm not telling anyone what they can or can't do. I'm saying why things are, or in this case were, done a particular way.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 21, 2021
#17
  • Apr 21, 2021
  • #17
No problem but here's the real point: it's always good practice to use the smallest hole possible. Trust me, as an aircraft machinist, I understand tolerances and how they apply. But the general thinking here is that a tight bolt will hold it in place and that's not true. Excess hole size will allow the bolt to move under heavy loads, which will further oversize the hole. It's just my experience, but in the end, it's your car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
866
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
C
Engine Idle cuts out
  • claypoolxx
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
545
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 5, 2026
KRUISR
Paint and Body Rotten moon roof trim
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
114
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 15, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
D
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
239
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
187
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?