• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

new best at track last night

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraM23
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2005

CobraM23

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
266
1
16
Johnson City, TN
May 20, 2005
#1
  • May 20, 2005
  • #1
Last night was the first night the dragstrip was open and I took my car up to see how much the headswap helped out. My best previous runs were 15.1's-15.2's @89-90mph with a 60' of around 2.2 or so. Well last night the track was terrible, I saw LS1 camaros and firebirds running low 14's with a trap around 110. A 2004 Mach 1 ran a 14.6 at 97. I managed to get only one run but I did so well (i think) that I called it a night. Now I know its not the fastest time and that alot of you run faster but I just thought Id share how much the headswap helped out.

Before Headswap: After Headswap:
60' 2.23 2.03
330' 6.281 5.979
1/8th 9.651 9.132
MPH 72.76 78.01
1000' 12.577 11.836
1/4 15.077 14.08
MPH 89.28 101.64

What amazes me is my 60' time got better after I had the Sportlines put in. I figured that would kill my traction.
 

CobraM23

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
266
1
16
Johnson City, TN
May 20, 2005
#2
  • May 20, 2005
  • #2
Heres the timeslip.
 

CobraM23

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
266
1
16
Johnson City, TN
May 21, 2005
#3
  • May 21, 2005
  • #3
bump
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
May 21, 2005
#4
  • May 21, 2005
  • #4
nice 60 ft. good times BTW what was the DA number. you need to record the weather info to get a accurate reading of your car.

too me from lookign at your MPH iand 60 ft it looks liek you are not powershifting. 101.64 with a 2.0 60 ft should be a 13.8 or so. you need too powershift and if you already are get a better shifter or practice.

then with that MPH and 60 ft time i bet you can get a 13.8 or so.
 

CobraM23

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
266
1
16
Johnson City, TN
May 21, 2005
#5
  • May 21, 2005
  • #5
MikeZ28 said:
nice 60 ft. good times BTW what was the DA number. you need to record the weather info to get a accurate reading of your car.

too me from lookign at your MPH iand 60 ft it looks liek you are not powershifting. 101.64 with a 2.0 60 ft should be a 13.8 or so. you need too powershift and if you already are get a better shifter or practice.

then with that MPH and 60 ft time i bet you can get a 13.8 or so.
Click to expand...

DA was 2995' that night. Sorry I forgot to mention that, but I do keep track of the weather conditions. Corrected to sea level it was right around a 13.5 or so which is pretty good. As far as powershifting, I cant, Ive got an auto. Im gonna go back next week, try a few things different, and see if I can get a 13 sec slip. I was just so happy because the last time I was at the track(2 yrs ago) I was trying just to get in the 14's and my first time back I almost bypassed them. Ive got a set of slicks on order right now that should knock a couple tenths off as well.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 22, 2005
#6
  • May 22, 2005
  • #6
i haven't made a trip to bristol yet, but i've always been told it's a few tenths slow there. i'll prolly end up going to steele on my next trip to the track for that reason. nice gains
 
G

gatsuM

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
7
0
0
May 22, 2005
#7
  • May 22, 2005
  • #7
Nice, specially that 60’, I have not been able to get my 60’ below a 2.19
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
May 22, 2005
#8
  • May 22, 2005
  • #8
CobraM23 said:
DA was 2995' that night. Sorry I forgot to mention that, but I do keep track of the weather conditions. Corrected to sea level it was right around a 13.5 or so which is pretty good. As far as powershifting, I cant, Ive got an auto. Im gonna go back next week, try a few things different, and see if I can get a 13 sec slip. I was just so happy because the last time I was at the track(2 yrs ago) I was trying just to get in the 14's and my first time back I almost bypassed them. Ive got a set of slicks on order right now that should knock a couple tenths off as well.
Click to expand...


LOL yeah a auto will rule out powershifting. i must have not seen your sig at the bottom. your car is making good power for it's mods. nice trap speed for a 2995 DA
 
C

crazykid2056

Banned
Apr 27, 2005
46
0
0
May 22, 2005
#9
  • May 22, 2005
  • #9
"I saw LS1 camaros and firebirds running low 14's with a trap around 110".

Are you sure? With that trap, they should be in the mid 13's.

LS1 cars right out of the box run low to mid 13's all day.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
May 22, 2005
#10
  • May 22, 2005
  • #10
Maybe It Was At Night
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
May 22, 2005
#11
  • May 22, 2005
  • #11
Jackie Chan said:
Maybe It Was At Night
Click to expand...

 
D

duece1019

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
26
0
0
mass
May 22, 2005
#12
  • May 22, 2005
  • #12
good times
 

CobraM23

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
266
1
16
Johnson City, TN
May 22, 2005
#13
  • May 22, 2005
  • #13
crazykid2056 said:
"I saw LS1 camaros and firebirds running low 14's with a trap around 110".

Are you sure? With that trap, they should be in the mid 13's.

LS1 cars right out of the box run low to mid 13's all day.
Click to expand...

I know they run that fast, there were some there that were running low 12's, I was explaining how terrible the track prep was that day. Those that were running 14's were just smoking em and not letting up. Bristol is a pretty good track, it does run a few tenths slower due to its elevation, but for their street fights night they dont prep it too well, like say for an NHRA event. I was no way implying that my car is faster than LS1s.
 
P

productj1

New Member
Apr 3, 2004
42
0
0
May 22, 2005
#14
  • May 22, 2005
  • #14
With a better 60 ft you can run 13.7 no problem. I ran a 13.80 with a 1.9 60 foot. At 100mph
 

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
May 22, 2005
#15
  • May 22, 2005
  • #15
Yes, I must agree, thats a very nice trap speed, your mods must be making some nice power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox At The Strip Last Night
  • RangerJoe
  • Aug 23, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 25, 2014
RangerJoe
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
My First Time Down A Track
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 13, 2014
  • Video and Media
Replies
2
Views
2K
Video and Media May 5, 2018
gtsn95
60ft Time Help
  • robert fugate
  • May 18, 2013
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 21, 2013
srtthis
Finally Ran My 91 At The Track Last Night With The New Setup
  • LarsD
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2012
RsStanG1987
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?