Went to the dyno again today since i was bored. made 319/339 at the wheels with a 13.63 A/F. So thats at the block 398/423peace
john
john
FOOT2DFLOOR
New Member
Dino Dino Bambino
15 Year Member
Great rear wheel numbers if it's a 302 but if your tranny is a T5, the flywheel numbers will be more like 367/390. I'd be very happy with those.
bentley429
Banned
S&B Are you being sarcastic? I was running just 92 pump gas.Bullitt95 i have a 3550 you divide your rear wheel number by .8 and thats your crank numbers. So on that note i made a mathematical mistake and it's 398HP/423TQ at the crank. FOOT2DFLOOR it's a 351 40 over low compression H/C/I peace
john
john
What heads cam and intake are you running?
voodo 499 lift cam AFR 185 58CC trickflow r series peace
john
I've always heard people say 15% drivetrain loss for most 5 speeds so that would put you at 366hp/390tq at the crank.
seems like pretty weak numbers no offense man, but with that much cubes and a good cyl head it should be making better power
sarcastic? i have a 3550 you divide your rear wheel number by .8 and thats your crank numbers. So on that note i made a mathematical mistake and it's 398HP/423TQ at the crank. FOOT2DFLOOR it's a 351 40 over low compression H/C/I peace
351 40 over with AFR 185s i gotta agree with 90lxcoupe no offense but those numbers are low, the good news john is u ur car has alot more potential with that setup
KamiKaziDK
Member
Guy's dont sweat it and i know the truth hurts! I was expecting closer to 400/400 when i built this. BUT with 8:1 compression and only 499 lift.What do you expect trust me i was f'n pissed off when i took it in for the tune and seen those numbers so now it's turbo time! peace
john
john
25thmustang
Mustang Master
blueink
Member
yeah those numbers are a bit low(NOW) but once that little snail finds its way in there, its going to be a monster!!! Im in the middle of a similar setup but looking for 10:1 compression. Just cant seem to find the money fast enough to get it done=-)
Turbo and a custom grind... Should be a monster!
Thats the plan
john
Dino Dino Bambino
15 Year Member
FOOT2DFLOOR it's a 351 40 over low compression H/C/I
Then your dyno numbers aren't so good after all but there's plenty of potential there. The low compression certainly won't help and your engine could do with running richer (12.5-13.0 NA, 11.5-12.0 FI) for best power. Sounds like you've got a good basis for a forced induction set-up so that would be a good plan. Combined with a better cam that 358 should rock.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 854
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 320
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 238
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 713