• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

New Edge vs S197

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stark77
  • Start date Start date Jul 1, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jul 3, 2008
#41
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #41
Once I get my 3.73's installed I'll be ready to challenge some S197 - without the nitrous. I may get smoked - but that's what the nitrous is for!
 

69mach1-409

Member
Apr 21, 2004
81
0
16
South Jersey
Jul 3, 2008
#42
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #42
Driven both the 2005+ and the 99-04's down the 1/4. The 2005+ is a good two to three tenths quicker in the Qtr Mile BONE STOCK. Once you start talking mods I cannot talk from experience on anything but my current car.

Back in April, at Atco NJ, she ran a 13.4 @ 105mph with nothing more then an intake and canned SCT tune. How do the 99-04's run with those two mods?

 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Jul 3, 2008
#43
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #43
69mach1-409 said:
Driven both the 2005+ and the 99-04's down the 1/4. The 2005+ is a good two to three tenths quicker in the Qtr Mile BONE STOCK. Once you start talking mods I cannot talk from experience on anything but my current car.

Back in April, at Atco NJ, she ran a 13.4 @ 105mph with nothing more then an intake and canned SCT tune. How do the 99-04's run with those two mods?

Click to expand...
I've seen a 01 Gt stalled auto with slicks running 13.8s in bracket racing. That was all that was done do it. That sucker would only put down like 215 to the tire.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jul 3, 2008
#44
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #44
My 2005 Mustang GT loves racing Mustangs at the track, it has not lost to another one yet. It has bit into 3 different 2003 - 2004 Mach 1's and beat them all easily. In fact it has gone faster and quicker than any of the 5 Mach 1's I have seen at that track and one of them had a lot of mods. I pointed that out before. I know that 2 Mach 1's were sold because they were slower than my GT.

I said this before and I will say it again. Stock for Stock, a 2005 GT is a driver's race for a 2003 - 2004 Mach 1. I think a quicker E.T. is possible with the S197 in stock trim with a good driver. Weight wise, the Mach 1 and S197 GT are close, very close. So a race between an older GT and the S197 GT would turn out very similar to what a Mach VS older GT would turn out. That is my $0.02 on it.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jul 3, 2008
#45
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #45
mogs01gt said:
I've seen a 01 Gt stalled auto with slicks running 13.8s in bracket racing. That was all that was done do it. That sucker would only put down like 215 to the tire.
Click to expand...

Then there was something wrong with his car. I ran a 13.6 in my automatic car when it had nothing but a catted x-pipe, pullies, and a tune on stock rubber.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Jul 3, 2008
#46
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #46
Flghtmstr1 said:
Then there was something wrong with his car. I ran a 13.6 in my automatic car when it had nothing but a catted x-pipe, pullies, and a tune on stock rubber.
Click to expand...
yeah with an auto? I dont believe that for a second. Autos are dogs without a converter or a shift kit.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 3, 2008
#47
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #47
I dunno where you race, but it sounds boring as hell if a stockish 05 GT is the fastest mustang out there. I regularly get my ass handed to me by an 11s 5.0 on spray or the 05+ GT with a kenne bell that runs very low 12s. We also regularly have at least 1 or 2 03/04 cobras (always different people) and a handful of other blown GTs of various years that come out just to see what they can do (always different ones too). And that's just what runs in the regular lanes... not the hot lanes.

So either you only run races you think you can win or that's a boring as hell track.

TGJ said:
My 2005 Mustang GT loves racing Mustangs at the track, it has not lost to another one yet....
Click to expand...
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jul 3, 2008
#48
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #48
bhuff30 said:
I dunno where you race, but it sounds boring as hell if a stockish 05 GT is the fastest mustang out there. I regularly get my ass handed to me by an 11s 5.0 on spray or the 05+ GT with a kenne bell that runs very low 12s. We also regularly have at least 1 or 2 03/04 cobras (always different people) and a handful of other blown GTs of various years that come out just to see what they can do (always different ones too). And that's just what runs in the regular lanes... not the hot lanes.

So either you only run races you think you can win or that's a boring as hell track.
Click to expand...

I didn't say I have the fastest/quickest Mustang there. What I said is, I have gone quicker and faster than any 03 - 04 Mach 1 has. There are some 10 second Mustangs and quicker stuff there. I am careful not to bite into the real quick foxes as they are easy enough to tell. I do try to pick races with cars that will be interesting for me to run against. Actually, I expected to get my ass handed to me by the SC'd and Nitrous powered S197 GT that I ran against last year. Due to him having some high RPM issues, I beat him and that was the only one I tried that was out of my car's league.
 

rabidscoobie

10 Year Member
Jun 21, 2007
616
12
48
College Station,TX
Jul 3, 2008
#49
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #49
TGJ said:
My 2005 Mustang GT loves racing Mustangs at the track, it has not lost to another one yet. It has bit into 3 different 2003 - 2004 Mach 1's and beat them all easily. In fact it has gone faster and quicker than any of the 5 Mach 1's I have seen at that track and one of them had a lot of mods. I pointed that out before. I know that 2 Mach 1's were sold because they were slower than my GT.

I said this before and I will say it again. Stock for Stock, a 2005 GT is a driver's race for a 2003 - 2004 Mach 1. I think a quicker E.T. is possible with the S197 in stock trim with a good driver. Weight wise, the Mach 1 and S197 GT are close, very close. So a race between an older GT and the S197 GT would turn out very similar to what a Mach VS older GT would turn out. That is my $0.02 on it.
Click to expand...

Well I dunno,I have ran 1 06 that was a friend(RIP) of mine and he could drive,I won,then another 05-07(dunno the diff)and I beat him.Far as I can tell Im all stock...the only thing I dunno about is the gears.So what is the specs on the 05's cause I have no clue.And on my mach Im not sure but isnt the specs something like 305hp 3??tq,I thought I read that the 04 mach is 310hp 3??tq I dunno.I read an 05 is around 300hp but then again I dunno,with that being said I dont really see how an 05gtvs03-04 mach stock for stock run....the 05 winning all that easily,especially when I have already beaten 2 and I know one of the drivers could drive and I got him by around 1 length.If those specs above are close and with the 03-04 being a lil lighter like I have been reading and 3.55 gears,I dunno what the new ones have,I would think the mach would be at a lil advantage,anyone please correct me if Im wrong on anything.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jul 3, 2008
#50
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #50
rabidscoobie said:
Well I dunno,I have ran 1 06 that was a friend(RIP) of mine and he could drive,I won,then another 05-07(dunno the diff)and I beat him.Far as I can tell Im all stock...the only thing I dunno about is the gears.So what is the specs on the 05's cause I have no clue.And on my mach Im not sure but isnt the specs something like 305hp 3??tq,I thought I read that the 04 mach is 310hp 3??tq I dunno.I read an 05 is around 300hp but then again I dunno,with that being said I dont really see how an 05gtvs03-04 mach stock for stock run....the 05 winning all that easily,especially when I have already beaten 2 and I know one of the drivers could drive and I got him by around 1 length.If those specs above are close and with the 03-04 being a lil lighter like I have been reading and 3.55 gears,I dunno what the new ones have,I would think the mach would be at a lil advantage,anyone please correct me if Im wrong on anything.
Click to expand...

Well a friend of mine had a 2004 Mach 1, he sold it and bought an 08 Bullitt. Same scale, same day and both of our cars having a full tank of gas, his Mach 1 was 5 kilograms HEAVIER than my 05 GT. We had a few races against each other with me winning all of them. To take the driver factor out of it, I even took his car down the track and I couldn't get it to run quicker than mine.

The only Mustangs I have hunted have been 03 - 04 Mach 1's and those that I have raced I beat. There is one I would have loved to run but I haven't seen him back at the track. He was on Stangnet and had quite a few mods to his 03 Mach 1. He was at the track on my first ever outing with my car and was content that I ran a 14.2 @ 99 MPH. The next Friday, he was there and watched me run a few times that night, 13.7 @ 101 - 104 MPH. He did not run either of those nights. the only thing he wanted to know is if I did any mods to my car since the previous Friday. When I told him no, he didn't say anything further to me and he has not logged back into Stangnet since then. I am pretty sure that I saw his car for sale in Alberta about 2 months later as I almost bought it and it had the exact mods his did as it was the same colour, year and was also from Saskatchewan. According to his Stangnet location, he was about 2 hours away from the dealership in Alberta that had the car.

His best with 3.55's was 13.7 @ 103 MPH with a lot mods( which I listed in previous S197 GT VS 03-04 Mach 1 posts ) including Drag Radials, I matched that with just a SLP LM axleback and Drag Radials on my second outing with the car. Later on that year, I went on to run a 13.68 @ 102 MPH with the same 2 mods and a MGW short throw shifter. Adding just a SCT X-Cal 2, I have been able to beat his best time with 4.10's that he had in his Mach 1. Hence I have trapped higher and ran quicker than his Mach 1 which has been the fastest 03 - 04 Mach 1 at that track.

I have only seen a few Mach 1's at the track and all are still running slower than I have. It is very rare to see one of those at the track.
 

rabidscoobie

10 Year Member
Jun 21, 2007
616
12
48
College Station,TX
Jul 3, 2008
#51
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #51
TGJ said:
His best with 3.55's was 13.7 @ 103 MPH with a lot mods( which I listed in previous S197 GT VS 03-04 Mach 1 posts ) including Drag Radials, I matched that with just a SLP LM axleback and Drag Radials on my second outing with the car. Later on that year, I went on to run a 13.68 @ 102 MPH with the same 2 mods and a MGW short throw shifter. Adding just a SCT X-Cal 2, I have been able to beat his best time with 4.10's that he had in his Mach 1. Hence I have trapped higher and ran quicker than his Mach 1 which has been the fastest 03 - 04 Mach 1 at that track.
Click to expand...

Am I reading wrong?You say he has 3.55's then you say you match his 4.10's.You beat his time with a tune also,I was stating stock vs stock.I know the driver plays a huge factor.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jul 3, 2008
#52
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #52
mogs01gt said:
yeah with an auto? I dont believe that for a second. Autos are dogs without a converter or a shift kit.
Click to expand...

Yea, well she ran what she ran. I have the timeslip; if you really care that much, I could upload it when I get home from work. It was a year or two ago, and I made a thread about it because I was so surprised. It wasn't a fluke, either, as I ran a bunch of 13.7s that day followed by the 13.6.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jul 3, 2008
#53
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #53
rabidscoobie said:
Am I reading wrong?You say he has 3.55's then you say you match his 4.10's.You beat his time with a tune also,I was stating stock vs stock.I know the driver plays a huge factor.
Click to expand...

To understand what I am saying, you need to see his sig., which I thought I posted previously.

Here it is:

2003 Mach 1 Azure Blue
Two Words Put The Entire Ride Into Perspective HANG ON!!
Nitto's 275/40/17's
Ford Racing 4:30 Gears
PHP Spacer
Hurst Line Lock
DiabloSport Predator
Custom X-pipe
Flowmaster 40 Series
K&N Aircharger (CAI
SS Inserts
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
MGW Accessories
AutoMeter - Air/fuel, Volts, D-Pic
NGK Iridium Spark Plugs
Bullit Fuel Door
Custom Ford Racing Decals
[Best E.T 13.7 at 103 mph with 3:55's in
Best E.T 13.5 at 101mph...with 4:30's in


I matched his 13.7 @ 103 with a SLP LM axleback and Drag Radials on my 2nd ever outing, I beat it by adding a MGW short-throw.

I beat his 13.5 @ 101 with a SLP LM axleback, Drag Radials, MGW Short Throw shifter and a SCT X-Cal 2.

Like I said earlier, I raced my friends 04 Mach 1. He had a Magnaflow Cat-back and Drag Radials compared to my SLP axleback and Drag Radials. Even when I drove his car, I couldn't get it to match what my car ran that day.
 

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jul 3, 2008
#54
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #54
I bet his SS inserts and Billet fuel door add at least +37rwhp +46 rwtq
hehehe
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 3, 2008
#55
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #55
Flghtmstr1 said:
Then there was something wrong with his car. I ran a 13.6 in my automatic car when it had nothing but a catted x-pipe, pullies, and a tune on stock rubber.
Click to expand...

I would say that there's something wrong with your car actually (in a good way), because that's quicker than any other 2V GT i've seen run with similar mods. Most auto's I've come accross are still running low-14's the those same few mods.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Jul 3, 2008
#56
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #56
The s197's are easily faster. I have beaten a couple, but only by a small margin, and I have cams and 4.10's. I probably make only about 5-10 more rwhp than a stock s197 with all the mods I have. The worst I ever beat one was by about 2.5 lengths, BUT my tires are horrible. And when I say horrible, I mean the stock tires were better...
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Jul 4, 2008
#57
  • Jul 4, 2008
  • #57
Gearbanger 101 said:
I would say that there's something wrong with your car actually (in a good way), because that's quicker than any other 2V GT i've seen run with similar mods. Most auto's I've come accross are still running low-14's the those same few mods.
Click to expand...
Exactly, I've been racing for a while and I know mod engines better than most. An auto with those little mods wont those times. They run mid 14s stock.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jul 4, 2008
#58
  • Jul 4, 2008
  • #58
Well guys, like I said, she ran what she ran. Here's the timeslip:
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 4, 2008
#59
  • Jul 4, 2008
  • #59
I'm not doubting you, I merely stated it was the quickest time I've ever seen a stock to near stock automatic GT run. That would be what we all know as a "factory freak". And not to get a bee under your bonnet, but lets be honest....time slips prove dick! If someone were still doubting you, there's nothing that proves you weren't running more mods than you let on to achieve those times. Heck, for all we would know, that's not even your car.

Just saying
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,301
18,007
224
Massachusetts
Jul 4, 2008
#60
  • Jul 4, 2008
  • #60
Does it matter? They are all Mustangs. Who cares who is faster than who. There is always someone faster with a crappier car anyway.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
7K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
M
New Edge Foxbody?
  • Marcus8299
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Oct 3, 2020
LILCBRA
Buy new 2011+ mustang vs supercharged fox / newedge ?
  • Trickflo
  • Jul 28, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
15K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 9, 2020
Mustang5L5
F
A couple photos of shiny new paint and molding stripe opinion question
  • firefyteremt
  • Jun 7, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2019
hotpony
T
Happy New S197 Gt Owner
  • Thumpr
  • Jun 8, 2017
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2017
Thumpr
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?