• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

new guy here - too much carb ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikemann0
  • Start date Start date Feb 26, 2011
M

mikemann0

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
5
0
0
Feb 26, 2011
#1
  • Feb 26, 2011
  • #1
Just signed up so hey everyone , 1st mustang but been around them , just got it this weekend and it was being built I assume for the track here is whats in it 306 c.i. , Edelbrock heads , 1.6 int. rockers , 1.7 exh. rockers , e303 cam , Edelbrock Victor JR manifold , Holley 670 street avenger , MSD 6AL ign. , Headman headers , H-Pipe , Flowmasters , subframe con. welded , Tremec T-5 , Centerforce clutch , 3.73 gear , and Weld Draglites with new street tires , oh and its an 87 coupe with a 89 gt lower all rebuilt , Idles mean and runs pretty good but not 100% , still needs some tuning , question is do I have too much carb and the wrong manifold for daily street use even with all the other work done or do i need to tone it down some maybe a 600 carb and rpm manifold or will that be a waste to the other parts , sorry so long .
 

bdazzgt

I had to jerk off the cable to get it to stop.
Dec 27, 2005
328
0
16
Springfield MO
Feb 27, 2011
#2
  • Feb 27, 2011
  • #2
too much manifold for the street, the Victor JR rpm range is 3500-8000 RPM. IMO kinda high for a daily driver i had a performer and it was great for my 84. I think the carb is ok but too much manifold
 

Stever89

5 Year Member
Dec 14, 2009
536
9
39
Biloxi, MS
Feb 28, 2011
#3
  • Feb 28, 2011
  • #3
I've got a similar setup, even the Victor jr, except I've got an Edelbrock 1406 (600 CFM) and I sometimes wonder if even that's too much. I've readjusted fuel pressure and it's better, but with 2.73 gears in 5th at highway speed, it's loading up. I'm hoping to remedy that with a 3.55. Out of the gate she's awesome though, no problems.
 
M

mikemann0

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
5
0
0
Feb 28, 2011
#4
  • Feb 28, 2011
  • #4
Thanks guys , she def. loads up doesnt want to cruise unless its screaming so I think I am going to try the performer and keep the carb and see what happens , need it mory daily friendly.
 
J

junkyardwarrior

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
400
113
63
Feb 28, 2011
#5
  • Feb 28, 2011
  • #5
The victor Jr isn't helping. They're good manifolds but a street car benefits greatly (with a 302/306) by using a good dual plane. I did this swap years ago (from a Torker 289 to a victor Jr to an RPM). Going to the RPM was a world of difference in terms of MPG, driveability, responsiveness, and cold starting. I would venture to guess that teh RPM was making probably 30-50 more lb-ft at 2000 RPM than the Jr did. And I ran an 830 carb. Mild 5.0 with an Erson hyd. roller camshaft, long tubes, flat tops and ported iron 1975 351w truck heads. Nothing special-but would surprise a lot of people.

Theres a lot of things to look at if you're loading up and/or idling poorly at lower speeds. A lot of timing advance can affect it. Too little timing. VACUUM LEAKS. Dist rotor out of phase. And a ton of other things.

I'm one of those people who believes that there is no such thing as too big of a carb. I even ran a 1050 Dominator (9375, IIRC) on that same exact engine for a good while because at that time the 830 was on the race car for a while when it was running gas (before changing to methanol). The 1050 performed well but on a 4150 manifold won't clear the stock hood when screwed to an adapter. I had a 4" cowl which came on the car.

With enough tuning, a 670 will be fine. You'll just have to experiment with stuff. Check timing first. They don't like a lot of timing. Seems like about 25° is about all they'll take at low speeds (initial + vacuum advance). Or if it's too little, they'll be real lazy, idle poorly, load up, that kind of thing. Vacuum leaks will cause stuff like that too. I haven't done this on a carb'd car but on injected cars, I made an adapter out a piece of PVC pipe, with a cap on the end with a male quick connect fitting that would usually go into an air tool (it has a 1/4 NPT thread, drill & tap the cap, screw it in), which clamps to the throttle body. I'll then pressurize the engine to no more than 10-15 psi (measure off of a vacuum/boost gauge) and then use soapy water to check for leaks in the most likely places. Throttle shafts, hoses, fittings, trees, "tee's", etc. Fix those leaks and it'll run a LOT better. On a V8 if you check for vacuum leaks that way, you need a lot of volume so make sure the compressor is up to the challenge. A little compressor won't do it-but they work for a 4 cyl engine. Just be careful. Too much psi can bust stuff. Found that out on a 2.3 once. Pegged the 30 psi gauge and before I knew it hoses were breaking-among other things.
 
M

mikemann0

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
5
0
0
Mar 1, 2011
#6
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #6
thanks jyw I do have a spare rpm mani I am going to try this weekend , I have found no vac leaks but am timed at 12 deg. also I have and msd 6 ign. is there now no vac advance from the dist does the box take care of that ?
 

Stever89

5 Year Member
Dec 14, 2009
536
9
39
Biloxi, MS
Mar 1, 2011
#7
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #7
Mike, let us know how that rpm swap goes.
 
M

mikemann0

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
5
0
0
Mar 1, 2011
#8
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #8
Will do gonna try and tackle it sat. after sons soccer game , I'll keep you posted.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 1, 2011
#9
  • Mar 1, 2011
  • #9
I've ran a Jr on the street many times on a 302. They can be good if the rest of your engine is built to run a lot of top end. My street intake of choice is the Wieand Stealth...IMO it can't be beat for a street intake. My 347 dynoed with one, and everyone at the shop said it would be the bottle neck...then they were all shocked at the numbers it put down.

As for the carb...it's a tad too much but it can work just fine. You may give up a bit of throttle response compared to a 600 and maybe a little bottom end.
 
M

mikemann0

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
5
0
0
Mar 6, 2011
#10
  • Mar 6, 2011
  • #10
Ok , Did the rpm mani. swap sat. kept the 670 street avenger but used a 1 " spacer so the air cleaner dont hit the dizzy , Went without any issues - couldnt believe it , runs a 100 % better as far as street manners go , now on to headlight replacements next then paint , thanks for the info everyone .
 

Stever89

5 Year Member
Dec 14, 2009
536
9
39
Biloxi, MS
Mar 8, 2011
#11
  • Mar 8, 2011
  • #11
mikemann0 said:
Ok , Did the rpm mani. swap sat. kept the 670 street avenger but used a 1 " spacer so the air cleaner dont hit the dizzy , Went without any issues - couldnt believe it , runs a 100 % better as far as street manners go , now on to headlight replacements next then paint , thanks for the info everyone .
Click to expand...

Good to know, and may help me out in the long run. Thanks for posting the results
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Picking Up New 89 Roller
  • Bill88Stang
  • Nov 22, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
822
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 22, 2015
Bill88Stang
F
  • Locked
Expired Fully Built 94 Mustang
  • fast5ooh
  • Oct 2, 2014
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 2, 2014
fast5ooh
F
K
New To Stangnet And Foxbodys
  • k8wdx
  • Mar 17, 2014
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
764
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2014
1968stang
Suspension Help
  • Old Skooler
  • Feb 29, 2012
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
528
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 29, 2012
Old Skooler
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?