Well, actually I guess most my questions are already answered. But anyway, I have an '86 Bronco thats about to go to Ford and get fixed (Had a problem with it starting. After I replaced the flexplate and the starter countless times and still having the problem, I'm fed-up and taking it to Ford cause I think it has an electrical problem. But anyway). Anyway, I'm going to sell it for reliablity issues. Anyway I'm looking into a Stang as my replacement. Just really curious on the realibility(?) of it. My Bronco has a 5.8 in it that's been very dependible and it's got 170k on it. Anyway, I'm assuming a 5.0 may be a little different, considering theres a different tranny and stuff. As well it's a Mustang with a 5.0 and it's under an obligation to be driven hard. So what say all you? I'm looking for an '89-92ish one. 

first to let u know 87-93 stangs are exactly the same in apprence some little things like steering wheels and stuff are diffrent, and they say 93 has less hp then its older brother, some say becuase the intake or something was more restricting some say ford decided to give out the real numbers that year, only a diffrernce of about 20hp a good amount but hey, first mustangs are awsome especially 5.0's there cheap and easy to find, its good if u find a stock one the lower the miles the better of course but more money, i got my car for 1700 with like 120kmiles which is alot even tho some people on here are at like 190kmiles and still running strong, if the car is not stock when u get it most likley the old owner drove it hard, thats why he put parts in it, so the more stock the better, make sure u get a t-5 5-speed autos are about 1.5secs slower in 1/4 mile and get worse gas milage, stangs are easy to work on and u can get parts for good prices, just some of my opinions i have on stangs, other people will probaly answer with more opinions but anyways if u buy one good luck and welcome
)