• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Trickflow Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter sspnotcback
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2013
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Aug 15, 2013
#1
  • Aug 15, 2013
  • #1
just wondering did anybody hear any more on the new trickflow 11r heads.a release date maybe....
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#2
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #2
I was told mid September....

Ti retainer version is around $1020/each going of memory. If I van help you with a set let me know...

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Aug 16, 2013
#3
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #3
im curious to see what kinda power you can make with them over something like a raised runner 20* head
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 16, 2013
#4
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #4
are these street/strip or a straight up racing head?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#5
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #5
stykthyn said:
are these street/strip or a straight up racing head?
Click to expand...

None of the info I have seen has mentioned emissions legality... I just tried trick flow but I forgot they shut down the phones for lunch 12-1pm

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#6
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #6
srtthis said:
im curious to see what kinda power you can make with them over something like a raised runner 20* head
Click to expand...

Yeah I haven't seen any numbers and heard any solid info yet. At $2000 a pair they'd have to be awesome for me to go that route over the new AFR 195...totally bad ass

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 16, 2013
#7
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #7
ok, let me rephrase. Is this a suitable head for a street driven stroker or is it best left for the devoted track cars?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#8
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #8
stykthyn said:
ok, let me rephrase. Is this a suitable head for a street driven stroker or is it best left for the devoted track cars?
Click to expand...

Be just fine...I've been told they will fit a standard TFS notch piston and based on this angles I believe will add even more PTV so a inline notch should still work just fine also.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Aug 16, 2013
#9
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #9
Rick 91GT said:
Yeah I haven't seen any numbers and heard any solid info yet. At $2000 a pair they'd have to be awesome for me to go that route over the new AFR 195...totally bad ass

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

honestly for that kind of money id start looking towards canted valve heads. i saw a set of new edlebrock Sc-1's with a sheet metal intake with 2 foggers on it and 2 1050 QFX carbs for 5000... hell you can find C3's pretty damn cheap also these days
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 16, 2013
#10
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #10
have they released any flow #'s on them yet.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#11
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #11
Not that I have seen...

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Aug 16, 2013
#12
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #12
well i was looking at them on summits website,they look bad ass.do you guys think it would be a big improvement over the edelbrock performer rpm heads i have on my 351w now.i was kinda leaning toward the 56cc chamber heads to up my already low compression. (dish pistons)
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 16, 2013
#13
  • Aug 16, 2013
  • #13
sspnotcback said:
well i was looking at them on summits website,they look bad ass.do you guys think it would be a big improvement over the edelbrock performer rpm heads i have on my 351w now.i was kinda leaning toward the 56cc chamber heads to up my already low compression. (dish pistons)
Click to expand...

Personally anything would be better then the Rpm heads you have now...the AFR 195 is a bad head as well and they are a tad cheaper. I'm excited about these TFS offerings been a long time since something truly new was brought out for the small block ford

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
865
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
342
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
A
Engine Genius installed oil filler above rocker arm…
  • afjLX
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
472
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2025
nicholase
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
121
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?