• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Night at the track!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 99GTNOOB
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2008

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#1
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #1
So last night went to the track, i have a bone stock 99 mustang with a k&N filter and no mufflers with stock 16" 225 width tires first 2 runs spun all the way down the track. next run heated the street tires up a bit and busted a 2.0 60ft and a 9 flat (1/8th mile track). i was pretty excited. Rest of the night it was consistant 9 flats and 9.1's For street tires and nothing really done to the car i thought that was pretty good got to whip up on a 2006 mustang gt and a couple 98 cobras barely but it felt good. Maybe im a good driver and they were just terrible drivers?? lol
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 14, 2008
#2
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #2
9.0 is great for a stock 99-04.

Especially with a 2.0 60'.

Sounds like you are a good driver.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Aug 14, 2008
#3
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #3
yea nice 60' time
 

BOOMSHAKALAKA

New Member
May 13, 2008
31
0
0
Aug 14, 2008
#4
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #4
Wow yeah good job my man. Just curious, what state are you in?
 

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#5
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #5
thanks ive been driving a manual since a young age. my mother MADE me learn lol but im in Florida, tampa/st. petersburg area
 

MyBloodRunsBlue

New Member
Feb 1, 2007
127
0
0
Aug 14, 2008
#6
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #6
vry nice times dude
 

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#7
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #7
the timeslips for my two 9 sec runs went as followed:


1st run
60' 2.097
330 5.908
1/8 9.012
MPH 77.79



2nd run
60' 2.136
330 5.928
1/8 9.076
MPH 78.00

what i dont get is how my 1/8 was slower in the second run but my mph was higher
 

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#8
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #8
MyBloodRunsBlue said:
vry nice times dude
Click to expand...

thanx man, you wouldnt happen to be on mafia would you??
 

fudleyd

New Member
Jan 10, 2003
180
0
0
Littleton, CO
Aug 14, 2008
#9
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #9
Good job man! I agree a 2.0 60' in a stock GT is some pretty good driving. What tires are you running?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 14, 2008
#10
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #10
99GTNOOB said:
the timeslips for my two 9 sec runs went as followed:


1st run
60' 2.097
330 5.908
1/8 9.012
MPH 77.79



2nd run
60' 2.136
330 5.928
1/8 9.076
MPH 78.00

what i dont get is how my 1/8 was slower in the second run but my mph was higher
Click to expand...


The reason for that is this...

The first run your 60' was better, meaning your car didn't spin as much. Less spinning usually results in a lower MPH but a better ET.

The second run you spun more, increasing your MPH a little but slowing your ET.
 

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#11
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #11
fudleyd said:
Good job man! I agree a 2.0 60' in a stock GT is some pretty good driving. What tires are you running?
Click to expand...


lol some fuzion ZRi's??? 225/55/16's
 
A

andy13186

New Member
Aug 14, 2008
14
0
1
Aug 14, 2008
#12
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #12
So you removed the mufflers? i guess that saves weight, how does it sound? Im thinking about doing the same
 

99GTNOOB

New Member
May 30, 2008
38
0
0
FLA
Aug 14, 2008
#13
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #13
andy13186 said:
So you removed the mufflers? i guess that saves weight, how does it sound? Im thinking about doing the same
Click to expand...


yea i had my local shop remove just the mufflers and weld piping in to replace where they were removed so that the exhaust still ran out of the back. Sounds pretty good for just a muffler delete but you have to replace it with piping at least to run them back out the end of the stock pipes.If you just hack them off and take the rest of the piping out it will sound like complete crap!!! i get compliments often asking what kind of exhaust im running hahaha and alot better than stock with pretty good results for 30 bucks
 

crzyhrse99

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
259
3
28
Kansas
Aug 14, 2008
#14
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #14
BurningRubber said:
9.0 is great for a stock 99-04.

Especially with a 2.0 60'.

Sounds like you are a good driver.
Click to expand...

+1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
J
02 pro charged gt is it worth the build for the track
  • john4utvols
  • Sep 28, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2020
Deleted member 38176
D
MM Road and track lowering springs not lowering?
  • impropernick
  • Aug 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2021
KRUISR
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?