• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

? nitrous & boosted

  • Thread starter Thread starter 281rush
  • Start date Start date Aug 9, 2007
2

281rush

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
30
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#1
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #1
01 gt with an s-trim pushing 15-16 lbs. Going to add on the direct port nitrous kit 100 shot on top of the vortech. Anyone have any feedback on this or someone doing this. Car has run so far (fully loaded automatic) a 10.6 at 129. Like to try some juice now.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 9, 2007
#2
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #2
This is a stock engine? Or forged bottom end? If stock say goodbye now, seriously.
 
2

281rush

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
30
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#3
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #3
Thought the 16lbs of boost was a dead give away of a built-up forged 2v motor. I have no experience with nitrous and wanted to see if anyone is running this combination with success. Yes I will have it retuned with a switch chip for nitrous use. This kit isn't cheap $1500+. Maybe people are running a dry kit with great success at less than 1/2 the cost.
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Aug 9, 2007
#4
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #4
Why go direct port? Direct port is for shots of >=150 right? To prevent puddling?

If I was you I would go with a dry shot. You already have the upgraded fuel system and bigger injectors in place.
 
2

281rush

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
30
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#5
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #5
No. It's a kit made for the 2v motors by nos. Eight individual noszles (8 nitrous lines and 8 fuel lines) one for each cylinder. Perfect shot to each cylinder. Looks very nice. Jet it for what you want 100-300hp.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Aug 9, 2007
#6
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #6
I have not done it but nitrous can be run with boost.
Let say you are running
60 Foot 1.5
1/8 Mile 6.7
1/4 Mile 10.6 128 MPH

With 100 shoot on 2nd gear shift
60 Foot 1.5
1/8 Mile 6.5
1/4 Mile 10.2 134 MPH
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Aug 9, 2007
#7
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #7
281rush said:
No. It's a kit made for the 2v motors by nos. Eight individual noszles (8 nitrous lines and 8 fuel lines) one for each cylinder. Perfect shot to each cylinder. Looks very nice. Jet it for what you want 100-300hp.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know the kit. Its a wet kit though. The kit is designed, among other things, to prevent intake fuel puddling which causes nitrous backfires. I would think since you are already are blown you have fuel upgrades. That being the case wouldnt it best to go with a dry shot? That way you significantly reduce the chance of intake backfire since you wont be spraying fuel into the intake.

Also I dont see you adding more than a 100 shot to a blown car. Half the advantage is going to be the nitrous cooling your intake temp. I have never heard of anyone adding more than 100. That being the case that direct port kit would be overkill.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Aug 9, 2007
#8
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #8
^ No it doesnt use the intake manifold to deliver the fuel or the N20. It uses the injector bosses. So its the safest of all the systems.

Plenty of people using N20 + boost. One guy on modular depot just threw on like a 125 shot over his 18PSI (601RWHP) setup and ended up with like 712RWHP. Just make sure its tuned well.
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Aug 9, 2007
#9
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #9
hotmustang331 said:
^ No it doesnt use the intake manifold to deliver the fuel or the N20. It uses the injector bosses. So its the safest of all the systems.

Plenty of people using N20 + boost. One guy on modular depot just threw on like a 125 shot over his 18PSI (601RWHP) setup and ended up with like 712RWHP. Just make sure its tuned well.
Click to expand...

Yeah thats I meant. The direct port kit avoids spraying into the intake and therefor puddling fuel. Normally that doesnt happen with shots less than 125rwhp increase so that being the case I dont see the point in using that kit unless you are spraying more than that.

Is the person you mentioned using a wet or a dry shot?

If you have the upgraded fuel system and injectors already I just dont see the point in going with a wet kit. Fuel in the intake is what usually causes the problem with nitrous so if you have the fuel system in place then it seems a dry shot would be preferrable.

This is all very interesting to me as I am planning on going centri at some point soon and perhaps using a small dry shot to keep my low end torque and cool the intake charge.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Aug 9, 2007
#10
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #10
^ Dry shot I believe....and I agree. Dry is very safe if you have a sick fuel system already. Less things to worry about (IE no fuel solenoid). And if the N20 solenoid goes bad on a dry shot....no harm done. Just wont spray....but the the fuel solenoid goes bad with a wet or direct injection kit....your in trouble LOL. Atleast I think the direct port uses a fuel solenoid...could be wrong.
 
2

281rush

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
30
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#11
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #11
That's what i was wondering... if I can get the same performance at less than 1/2 the cost with a 100 shot of a dry system then why not if people think the direct port is overkill and not needed. My fuel system is more than enough. Cobra tank &pumps, 55lb inj. , K/B boost a pump set very low...almost off. More hp and torque and a great intercooler effect from nos. I also run the vortech aftercooler. My A/F ratio is 11.3 right across the board (safe tune).
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Aug 9, 2007
#12
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #12
As soon as I get my car back and running Im doing a 50 Dry shot right before my intercooler, Ive seen quite afew guys do this and it makes great power. The guys spraying a 50 shot are seeing close to 100 rwhp gains. I couldnt belive it but its true.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Aug 10, 2007
#13
  • Aug 10, 2007
  • #13
SamMan said:
Why go direct port? Direct port is for shots of >=150 right? To prevent puddling?

If I was you I would go with a dry shot. You already have the upgraded fuel system and bigger injectors in place.
Click to expand...

direct port or dry kit is the way to go with his power level and mods. you can use a direct port for a 100 shot, but in his case a dry kit might be better suited unless he plans to go all out and run 200-300 shot someday if he does then go direct port.
 
2

281rush

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
30
0
0
Aug 10, 2007
#14
  • Aug 10, 2007
  • #14
I think I'll save my $$$ and go with a dry shot. I would never use the full potential of the direct port system. Interesting about spraying it before the intercooler. Never thought of that. Thanks for all replys.
 
9

98MACH1R

I wanna put it in so bad, please help.
Jun 6, 2005
131
0
0
Aug 10, 2007
#15
  • Aug 10, 2007
  • #15
281rush said:
I think I'll save my $$$ and go with a dry shot. I would never use the full potential of the direct port system. Interesting about spraying it before the intercooler. Never thought of that. Thanks for all replys.
Click to expand...

hey man why dont you just buy it here ?
http://www.americanmuscle.com/nx-v8-efi-dps-8605.html

they are 849.99 for the direct port, thats a lot cheaper then 1,500.00 that your finding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
573
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
559
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
651
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
497
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?