• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Noob question on intake gaskets

  • Thread starter Thread starter doctorj357
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2019

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jun 15, 2019
#1
  • Jun 15, 2019
  • #1
So I decided to year down my intake manifold on my 95 because I suspected a leak or two. That + plus I didn't have a lot of confidence in the prior owners putting it back together right. Glad I did cause I found out that the etc they used leaked. I got a mess to clean up but it's manageable.

On my engine I have the older Edelbrock Performer RPM EFI intake and Performer heads (1.90 valve). I ordered a set of new Edelbrock intake gaskets and the right rtv. Also read online how to do this and seems pretty straight forward, except with regards to the EGR inserts. I can't find any direction how these need to be used.

Now I still run my EGR. On my lower intake it has one port - center on top - that runs to the passenger side. Both heads are provisioned and that passage runs directly to the port on the passenger side head. So for my gaskets, do I put the insert with hole on the passenger side and the solid (no hole) on the driver's side to keep it blocked off?
 
Last edited: Jun 15, 2019

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,853
10,530
203
polk county florida
Jun 15, 2019
#2
  • Jun 15, 2019
  • #2
I have not taken my 95 cobra apart yet so lets haller at @jozsefsz and get his 'intake' on this.
 

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jun 16, 2019
#3
  • Jun 16, 2019
  • #3
Sometimes easier to describe with pictures. So if my lower intake only has one passage for the EGR leading to the passenger head, then I block off the other (drivers side) head like pictured?









 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,853
10,530
203
polk county florida
Jun 16, 2019
#4
  • Jun 16, 2019
  • #4
That will work. You will notice that only one side of the intake has a passage for it.
 
R

RioRed95Cobra

Active Member
Apr 7, 2017
180
17
28
Jun 17, 2019
#5
  • Jun 17, 2019
  • #5
Maybe i'm drunk. I don't even understand what you mean.. and I have the same intakes haha
 

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jun 17, 2019
#6
  • Jun 17, 2019
  • #6
Might be drunk too....lol. But I think I figured it out today. The throttle body spacer specific for 94/95 only, blocks off the port for egr gasses on the upper intake. If I had a 86-93, it would be a different spacer that would make use of that port. So it largely has to do with the EGR design differences between 86-93 vs 94/95

 
R

RioRed95Cobra

Active Member
Apr 7, 2017
180
17
28
Jun 18, 2019
#7
  • Jun 18, 2019
  • #7
That port dead ends. So, i'm still confused myself.. it's almost like a carbon deposit lol.
 

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jun 21, 2019
#8
  • Jun 21, 2019
  • #8
Now realizing its blocked a the TB adapter/elbow like shown above, figured there's no sense in allowing it to flow from either end. So I just blocked off the egr ports on both heads at the intake runner gasket. The EGR will still flow into the intake, but will just use the main bore to flow into the 8 runners from top - > down.

Gonna find out tonight if it was in vain or not
 
R

RioRed95Cobra

Active Member
Apr 7, 2017
180
17
28
Jun 21, 2019
#9
  • Jun 21, 2019
  • #9
doctorj357 said:
Now realizing its blocked a the TB adapter/elbow like shown above, figured there's no sense in allowing it to flow from either end. So I just blocked off the egr ports on both heads at the intake runner gasket. The EGR will still flow into the intake, but will just use the main bore to flow into the 8 runners from top - > down.

Gonna find out tonight if it was in vain or not
Click to expand...

Methinks that will cause issues.
 

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jun 21, 2019
#10
  • Jun 21, 2019
  • #10
Why do you think that? Not saying it won't, I just don't see how anything really changes here.

Before with the cutout inserted in the gasket on the passenger head, exhaust could travel thru the port on the lower but would be blocked once it got to the elbow adapter attached on the upper. Only difference now, with the block off gasket inserted on the passenger side head at the runner, its blocking it at both ends.

So IMHO it shouldn't do anything different. Other than maybe not foul up that port in the lower/upper intake now since its sealed on both ends.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,632
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 20, 2019
#11
  • Jul 20, 2019
  • #11
The 94/95 Mustang does not feed the exhaust gas through the intake like the 93'-. All those ports in the heads should be blocked. The EGR is fed exhaust from an external tube that leads up from one of the primary exhaust tubes on the exhaust header on the passenger side of the car. Is that tube still present?

Kurt
 

doctorj357

5 Year Member
Aug 7, 2018
98
22
18
Michigan
Jul 25, 2019
#12
  • Jul 25, 2019
  • #12
So late reply here, but yes I have the EGR tube on the exhaust manifold. Before I put the upper back on, I ended up blocking it off on both heads. EGR is passing gas from the manifold & directly through the intake elbow down into the combustion chambers. Seems to be running just fine.
 
R

RioRed95Cobra

Active Member
Apr 7, 2017
180
17
28
Jul 27, 2019
#13
  • Jul 27, 2019
  • #13
doctorj357 said:
So late reply here, but yes I have the EGR tube on the exhaust manifold. Before I put the upper back on, I ended up blocking it off on both heads. EGR is passing gas from the manifold & directly through the intake elbow down into the combustion chambers. Seems to be running just fine.
Click to expand...

You blocked off the holes on the back of the heads for the air tube.. and are still running the egr??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
115
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
82
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
180
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Blackhawkxx
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
177
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
712
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?