• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Okay I cant decide so I need help. 88GT vs 85GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter dubbsix
  • Start date Start date Jun 16, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 16, 2011
#1
  • Jun 16, 2011
  • #1
Here is the deal. I currently own a 88gt that did not run when i bought it and I have since removed the motor and started planning the motor build...when i came across a 85 GT for $1400.

Here is the break down for both cars.

88GT:
Purchased for $500
$500.00 back registration
Needs small dents and dings removed before paint
Needs new front bumper cover
Needs new rear bumper cover
Needs new carpet
Needs new drivers seat
Both seats need cleaning.
Has bent radiator support
Needs new radiator
Needs clutch
Needs Windshield
New Front Lights
Engine requires rebuild
Needs tires


85GT
$1400 Purchase price
Runs and drives(all stock)
Needs Clutch
Needs tires
Needs headliner
Needs big dent pulled/repair from rear quarter
Needs front bumper
Needs door panels


I know the list for the 88 is longer, but I feel someone connected to the 88 and just dont want to abandon it. I know i guess that silly. My intent is to build on a budget a car that can put down close to 350HP. I already have a set of gt40 heads. so which approach is best?

Thanks for looking because im totally caught!
 

FordRacing302

5 Year Member
Oct 1, 2005
384
42
59
Cleveland, TN
Jun 16, 2011
#2
  • Jun 16, 2011
  • #2
I say go for the 85GT but thats because Im partial to 4eyes...But in all honesty its up to you. They both sound like junkboxes, No offence
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 16, 2011
#3
  • Jun 16, 2011
  • #3
FordRacing302 said:
I say go for the 85GT but thats because Im partial to 4eyes...But in all honesty its up to you. They both sound like junkboxes, No offence
Click to expand...

None taken. they both need work. The 88 seems more like the basket case to me and I thought putting a carb'd 351w in it would just be wicked. I dont see many four-eyed mustangs here in CA.
 

jgarrard

Member
Apr 3, 2010
90
0
7
Gadsden,Al
Jun 17, 2011
#4
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #4
I vote for the 85gt also. I had a nice one about 13yrs or so ago and I kick myself everytime I look at a picture of it. I also am partial to 4eye cars and would give almost anything to find and get my old car back.
 
J

JamesB88

Member
May 29, 2004
228
0
16
North Kansas City
Jun 17, 2011
#5
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #5
fix the 88, 4 eye cars are ugly...
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 17, 2011
#6
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #6
My personal preference is the '85. Not a huge fan of the 87-93 GT body styling, and I'm partial to 4-eyes anyway.

That said, you're going to spend a lot of time and money on that '85 just getting it up to 87-93 standards. There are a lot of little nuances about the 4 eye cars that you find along the way that are different from the Aero cars. Wiring is different, plumbing is different, they use different parts, some of the chassis and suspension is different.... Etc. It's just stupid little stuff mostly, but it adds up and can be a PITA.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 17, 2011
#7
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #7
What's so different about the 85 besides the exhaust and rear end?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 17, 2011
#8
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #8
dubbsix said:
What's so different about the 85 besides the exhaust and rear end?
Click to expand...

A million little things. Strut towers are shaped differently. Different brake system setup. (Obviously) different wire harness. Different battery/battery tray. Different alternator. Blah blah blah blah.

Believe me, I've been dealing with this for 8 years with my '86, which has even more in common with the '87-'93 cars than an '85 does. It just gets frustrating when it's so easy to find parts and upgrades for '87-'93 cars, but to install them on your 4-eye you have to first do this, this, and this.

Don't get me wrong, I love my 4-eye.
 

TMIproducts

5 Year Member
Apr 19, 2011
373
58
49
Corona , California
Jun 17, 2011
#9
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #9
I vote for the '85, and agree with you. Their really aren't too many of them here on the west coast - saw a TON at Carlisle a few weeks back. I think they look a bit tougher, more muscle car, less sports car. That's my two cents! Maybe post some pics up of the two
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jun 17, 2011
#10
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #10
JamesB88 said:
fix the 88, 4 eye cars are ugly...
Click to expand...

You're the worst.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Jun 17, 2011
#11
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #11
4 eye for sure.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 17, 2011
#12
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #12
TMIproducts said:
I vote for the '85, and agree with you. Their really aren't too many of them here on the west coast - saw a TON at Carlisle a few weeks back. I think they look a bit tougher, more muscle car, less sports car. That's my two cents! Maybe post some pics up of the two
Click to expand...

Thanks for your help!
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 17, 2011
#13
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #13
NikwoaC said:
A million little things. Strut towers are shaped differently. Different brake system setup. (Obviously) different wire harness. Different battery/battery tray. Different alternator. Blah blah blah blah.

Believe me, I've been dealing with this for 8 years with my '86, which has even more in common with the '87-'93 cars than an '85 does. It just gets frustrating when it's so easy to find parts and upgrades for '87-'93 cars, but to install them on your 4-eye you have to first do this, this, and this.

Don't get me wrong, I love my 4-eye.
Click to expand...

I feel your frustration. I think the carb setup will be more in my budget than the efi and the 85 is actually a running driving car where mine is a basket case. Where I live there are plenty of mustangs in the junkyard so things like rear-ends, trans cross members for duals are easy to come by. Can I get 350HP from a top end swap on a carb'd 5.0?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 17, 2011
#14
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #14
dubbsix said:
Can I get 350HP from a top end swap on a carb'd 5.0?
Click to expand...

Oh, EASILY.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 17, 2011
#15
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #15
I didn't even read the first post, because when it comes to 4 eye or not 4 eye, there is no debate to make. 4 eye FTMFW.

/thread
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 17, 2011
#16
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #16
NikwoaC said:
Oh, EASILY.
Click to expand...

Wow. I think that really helps make up my mind.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 17, 2011
#17
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #17
At the wheels or at the flywheel?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 17, 2011
#18
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #18
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
At the wheels or at the flywheel?
Click to expand...

I'm assuming he means flywheel. So, ~300 to the tire.
 

dubbsix

Member
Oct 18, 2006
347
2
19
Katy,TX
Jun 17, 2011
#19
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #19
NikwoaC said:
I'm assuming he means flywheel. So, ~300 to the tire.
Click to expand...

Yes that was my origional goal. To get 300HP to the wheels and have fun with that while building a 351W to drop it when its complete. Would that require a cam swap or can I get 300 to the wheels with stock cam?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 17, 2011
#20
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #20
Well, it may be possible with a stock cam but i personally haven't seen it done. If i had to guess i would say my 302 was making around 300 at the wheels with my C9 heads, X303 cam, Stealth intake and 650 Holley and all the other usual stuff. That guess is judging by how much power my 347 makes with the same heads/intake/carb, but slightly more cam.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
172
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
515
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Thinking of looking at this 67 coupe. Looking for some opinions.
  • billison
  • Aug 11, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2024
89ripper
New to me 98 Cobra
  • bird_dog0347
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?