• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Old picture I found

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteStallionGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 17, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

GreenStangGT

Member
Jan 29, 2004
135
7
18
Feb 1, 2007
#21
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #21
WhiteStallionGT said:
haha yeah the pics are overexposed, I was just messin with the settings. Night shots are freakin hard. I don't know if I'll ever take them right.
Click to expand...

Night shots can definitely be hard, and digital cameras are harder than film to do well with low light conditions. But you CAN do it! I encourage you to learn the camera you have better, it'll lead to much better pictures and stuff that you'll be much happier with.
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Feb 3, 2007
#22
  • Feb 3, 2007
  • #22
damn I want a nice camera now, my little cannon SD200 cant cut it.
 

mustang6tee8

Member
Jul 19, 2005
375
0
17
College Station, TX
Feb 6, 2007
#23
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #23
Casio Exilim 5MP



I guess we're all pic whoring at this point.
 

Attachments

  • CIMG5330.webp
    24.1 KB · Views: 92

rgs

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
124
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Feb 8, 2007
#24
  • Feb 8, 2007
  • #24
these are with a canon powershot a540



 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Feb 8, 2007
#25
  • Feb 8, 2007
  • #25
Nice!!!!!!!!!!

Man why did you post that, now I have to get a job and earn money to buy springs and rims.
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Feb 9, 2007
#26
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #26
rgs, thats a good trap and a good 1320 if all you had was in your sig and ill second the canon powershot.... sd630 here 6.0 MP takes amazing pics, and even the 800 setting ISO speed has very little noise.
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Feb 9, 2007
#27
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #27
Before:



After:

 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Feb 9, 2007
#28
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #28
Thanks Caldwell! That's much nicer!

What did you do with it? Sharpen?
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Feb 9, 2007
#29
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #29
That is way over-sharpened. The picture only has a slight motion blur about the Y-axis. You can use the smart sharpen tool (Photoshop CS2) to fix it accurately without over-sharpening.

Here . . .
Any more sharpening than this and it will start looking like you sharpened it artificially. Always check your images before taking down the tripod and calling it a day. You'll find you have to redo at least one shot pretty often.
View attachment 404622
 

AaronG

New Member
Jun 25, 2003
47
0
0
Feb 9, 2007
#30
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #30
rgs said:
these are with a canon powershot a540



Click to expand...

Give my car back, crook!
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Feb 10, 2007
#31
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #31
Zero Signal said:
That is way over-sharpened. The picture only has a slight motion blur about the Y-axis. You can use the smart sharpen tool (Photoshop CS2) to fix it accurately without over-sharpening.

Here . . .
Any more sharpening than this and it will start looking like you sharpened it artificially. Always check your images before taking down the tripod and calling it a day. You'll find you have to redo at least one shot pretty often.
Click to expand...

I'll agree that my version was over sharpened, but your image had too much of a blur.

And I'd take my version over Zero's any day of the week.
Sorry bro, but your version just doesn't look all that different. There's no crisp look to yours. No pop. It still looks like the picture was taken with a disposable camera.

I did a few things, I adjusted the black/white levels, contrast, saturation and obviously, the sharpness.
 
R

RAD

New Member
Jun 16, 2006
167
0
0
Feb 11, 2007
#32
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #32
AaronG said:
Give my car back, crook!
Click to expand...

can you post some more pics in 94-95 sticky thread? your car looks very nice
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
96
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
B
My old account
  • bk_cauley (un) brian keith cauley
  • Feb 18, 2026
  • Feedback Area | Testing Zone
Replies
1
Views
265
Feedback Area | Testing Zone Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
R
Fox Foxbody Notchback Coupe 1979
  • robrouck
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
299
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 20, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
134
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?