• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Opinion: Built 351w or supercharged(centrifugal) 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter igotyofire
  • Start date Start date Apr 12, 2005

Assuming both setups were going to Reach your power goal which would you choose?

  • A Built 351w

    Votes: 11 57.9%
  • Supercharged (vortech) 302

    Votes: 8 42.1%

  • Total voters
    19
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Apr 12, 2005
#1
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #1
Just to start some discussion sorta based on would you prefer NA or FI and why. I would like to know if u could choose between these two options which route would you go stateing some advantages and disadvantages of the other

Also isn't usually NA 400hp cars faster then 400hp Forced induction powered cars. The NA car usually has a broader range of power ? True or false i know it depends on setup be generally speaking?
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Apr 12, 2005
#2
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #2
bump, heh i guess nobody wants to discuss
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Apr 12, 2005
#3
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #3
i'm running a 351 in my 95. i always wondered how a superchargered 302 based engine would run. i think it could be a little more cost effective and provide a good amount of power potential.
but the thing about a 400 na vs a 400 s/c? i would think the n/a motor would be quicker cause there is more available power in the power band sooner?
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Apr 12, 2005
#4
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #4
Do a stroked 351...then run boost to it. If it's in your budget and you don't do it you'll regret it later. Long as you have the funds why skimp on the displacement and it's a stronger block to begin with anyway. A properly build 351 stroker would put out around the same or more power as the charged 302. And you can boost the 351+ later and have that much more. They get hella expensive though.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 12, 2005
#5
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #5
A properly built, stock stroke 351 should have no problems making 425 RWHP, be perfectly streetable, and emission-legal.

A properly built 408 (4.030 x 4) should make 500 with no problems.

Your stock block 302 can't make that much smoke....

Joe
 

streetflossin

New Member
May 29, 2004
53
0
0
Central Jersey
Apr 12, 2005
#6
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #6
not to hyjack this thread but 351w stroker kits are all priced the same for the 393ci 3.850" the 408ci 4.000" and the 419ci 4.100" why would someone chose the 408 or the 393 instead of the bigger 419? what is the main drawback since they are all priced the same
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Apr 12, 2005
#7
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #7
Good question. I can't think of anything off hand, but it may be that some racing classes have limits on cubic inches. I'm guessing it poses the same question why wouldn't someone choose a 347 over a 331, 327, 318, 310, 306 and so on. That's all I can think of, Marketing also may play a role. Maybe someone else could chime in with more reasons.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Apr 12, 2005
#8
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #8
I'd just get a blower and be done with it. An engine swap would be too much of a hassle IMO, also I'd like to keep this as daily drivable friendly as possible.
 

streetflossin

New Member
May 29, 2004
53
0
0
Central Jersey
Apr 12, 2005
#9
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #9
a 302 to 351 swap isnt all that bad, you can get a 351 lower intake to use your 302 upper, if you have a gt40 or whatever, new headers, new oil pan. should cost around $1,000 for the swap. Im going to start a 4cyl to 351 swap now that should be some hair pulling excitement

WhiteStallionGT said:
I'd just get a blower and be done with it. An engine swap would be too much of a hassle IMO, also I'd like to keep this as daily drivable friendly as possible.
Click to expand...
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Apr 12, 2005
#10
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #10
lol, good luck man
 

streetflossin

New Member
May 29, 2004
53
0
0
Central Jersey
Apr 12, 2005
#11
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #11
luck, i need much more then luck, maybe a doctor i can talk to when i get crazy urges. but it gives me something to do and keeps me out of trouble and in debt thanks for wishing me luck though, im sure i will need it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
The LS Fox Concept Car
  • yldouright
  • Jul 19, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 26, 2018
General karthief
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?