• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

opinions on t-birds

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrSmith
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

kendoo130

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
244
0
16
Huntington Station N.Y.
Aug 12, 2008
#21
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #21
I'm on my 6th Turbo Coupe now- 5.0-5 speed conversion. I love these cars!!! But I must say even with snow tires these things are just as bad as my mustang in bad weather. I've had this car since the 90's and now parts that are turbo coupe specific are going through tthe roof! (headlights, mouldings etc) I hate to say it but I don't recommend this car as a winter car.

Ken
 

Attachments

  • T-bird.webp
    31.6 KB · Views: 100
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Aug 12, 2008
#22
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #22
ranger04 said:
There were no manual cougers in the rear wheel drives unless you go back to the 60's and 70's. The front wheel drive couger they made a couple of years ago had the manual tranny option.
Click to expand...

I don't remember what year(s) it was but the Cougar XR7 with the SC'd 3.8L had an optional 5spd manual. It was between the years of 1989 - 1991. Very rare to find one of those though.
 
E

Elijahbird7

New Member
Oct 4, 2007
4
0
1
Lindenhurst, Illinois
Aug 29, 2008
#23
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #23
I currently have 3 Thunderbirds: '56 Peacock blue, '66 428 Tahoe Turquoise, and '04 Merlot.
I had a '96 Tbird that I didn't keep long. It was a v/8 loaded. It did not have a limited slip rear end, and even when it rained, the right rear wheel would spin, and you had little traction, so if you get one, I would not get one without "posi". I had a lot of trouble with wheel balance issues. I went through 4 sets of tires and 2 sets of wheels, and no one, including Ford could figure out why I had balance problems at highway speeds. I traded it in with 11,000 miles on it for a Black '98 GT coupe, which I traded in with 2,600 miles in 2000 for a Black GT Convertible, which I traded in with 5,000 miles for a 2004 Tbird.
I had a friend at work who also had a '96 Bird, and he drove his for about 150,000 miles before it finally was shot. As for the person who commented about loving the new birds, with an SCT tune, K&N CAI, and glass packs, I would guess mine to be putting out about 320 hp, and it really moves.
I also have an '08 GT vapor coupe now with about 2,300 miles on it. I changed the plugs to the one piece Champions, and have been getting unbelievable mileage. On a recent trip to Wisconsin, at the speed limit, no air on, with cruise set at 65, it got 30.3. Right now just driving to work and back this week, it's at 25.4, and that's with an auto.
The highest I got before the plug change was 27.1, so the plugs must have had some influence on the mileage.
 

xtweakerx

New Member
Feb 26, 2007
411
0
0
Jupiter,FL
Aug 29, 2008
#24
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #24
Thunderbirds are ugly as all hell. Won't get you any looks or girls.

However it is a solid car my friend had one when we were teens and BOY did we beat the hell out of that thing.. Good times..

However i wouldnt own one cuz they look like Grim Death.
 

GOLDENPONY

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
1,503
0
36
LOVELAND, OHIO
Aug 29, 2008
#25
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #25
"New" 'Birds

Elijahbird7 said:
I currently have 3 Thunderbirds: '56 Peacock blue, '66 428 Tahoe Turquoise, and '04 Merlot.
I had a '96 Tbird that I didn't keep long. It was a v/8 loaded. It did not have a limited slip rear end, and even when it rained, the right rear wheel would spin, and you had little traction, so if you get one, I would not get one without "posi". I had a lot of trouble with wheel balance issues. I went through 4 sets of tires and 2 sets of wheels, and no one, including Ford could figure out why I had balance problems at highway speeds. I traded it in with 11,000 miles on it for a Black '98 GT coupe, which I traded in with 2,600 miles in 2000 for a Black GT Convertible, which I traded in with 5,000 miles for a 2004 Tbird.
I had a friend at work who also had a '96 Bird, and he drove his for about 150,000 miles before it finally was shot. As for the person who commented about loving the new birds, with an SCT tune, K&N CAI, and glass packs, I would guess mine to be putting out about 320 hp, and it really moves.
I also have an '08 GT vapor coupe now with about 2,300 miles on it. I changed the plugs to the one piece Champions, and have been getting unbelievable mileage. On a recent trip to Wisconsin, at the speed limit, no air on, with cruise set at 65, it got 30.3. Right now just driving to work and back this week, it's at 25.4, and that's with an auto.
The highest I got before the plug change was 27.1, so the plugs must have had some influence on the mileage.
Click to expand...


I'm the guy that loves the new 'birds. If that baby had a five or preferably a six speed, there'd be a "For Sale" sign on my Mustang.
 

CBus 06 GT

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
0
9
29
Columbus, Ohio
Aug 29, 2008
#26
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #26
I have a soft spot in my heart for the MN12. I drove a '91 base V-6 model from '95 to '01 when my mom got a '96 LX with the 4.6 and handed the '91 down to me. I think they are a very underrated car. Nice ride, decent handling, comfortable. The only issues I had with mine were rear wheel bearings in the uprights. Other than that, the '91 was a great car for a college/post college just getting started kid. My mom's 96 had issues with killing O2 sensors. I cried a little when Ford quit making them. Too bad society thinks you need 4 doors or an SUV in a daily driver. As to there ability in the winter, I thought it was OK for the most part. Once the snow flies, keep a 50lb bag of sand in the trunk and a full tank of gas to keep weight over the rears and you'll be OK, and that is with standard all-weather tires, not snow tires. Then again, I am a person who has never owned a FWD car, all I've ever owned are RWD cars and trucks, so what do I know about good snow traction.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 29, 2008
#27
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #27
GOLDENPONY said:
I'm the guy that loves the new 'birds. If that baby had a five or preferably a six speed, there'd be a "For Sale" sign on my Mustang.
Click to expand...

If by "new birds" you mean the retro models they made from 2002-2005, then yes.....I think you are the only one who loved them. I can't say they were all that bad of a car really, but they were way underpowered and way overpriced (by about $15,000), which is probably what killed them.

You gotta remember, the T-Bird was the original 2-seater competitor of the Corvette. Ford had a real opportunity to capitalize on that again when they redesigned the "retro" car in 2002, but instead decided to make it an overpriced yuppie-mobile.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
1996 gt mustang block temp vs coolant temp
  • Dkuehn
  • May 21, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
72
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
squeak93
Hello Mustang community!
  • MKatzenbach
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
222
The Welcome Wagon Mar 14, 2026
MKatzenbach
D
Resolved Vortech hitting hood
  • Dchichizola
  • May 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
General karthief
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?