• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Opinions on this new combo PLEASE!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike keirstead
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 29, 2003
#1
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #1
Gt-40 iron heads (Non-p) port matched to 1250 gasket
Trick Flow Street heat with 1 inch spacer, port matched to 1250.
Lunati 51014 cam installed straight up.
1.72 Roller rocker
New 308 with forged pistons and new cast crank.
3 1/2 inch AFM powerpipe with 73 C&L MAF

Plus all the regular bolt-ons. 3.73s and z-spec t-5.
Rollcage and full length subframe connectors.

Suspension is setup for high rpm launches and hooks awsome.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#2
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #2
ttt
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Dec 30, 2003
#3
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #3
looks good to me, but missing a power adder.. . Whats your suspension setup?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 30, 2003
#4
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #4
Mike - the only thing I'd note, I've read posts from reputable folks on the sites, that port matching to the 1250 on the bottom of the port may not be necessary, and may actually hurt you. Matching the sides and the top will help the 'straight shot' to the valve; but opening it up on the bottom my hurt you. You may want to research it some more, but based on my limited knowledge, I'd gasket match top and sides; and I'd only remove enough material on the bottom to get a good port match; I wouldn't take it all the way down to the gasket opening.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#5
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #5
Michael--That was my plan. I heard a while ago about the bottom of the port. I am just doing the sides and top so they match or close to a 1250. Thanks for the info though.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#6
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #6
My suspension is good. Steeda aluminum uppers(adjustable). Lakewood lowers. Koni adjustable shocks. Torque boxes welded. Roll cage and full length frame connectors.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#7
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #7
You will not be able to run the 4" AFM power pipe with a C&L meter, they will not read correctly. You will need a 80mm Pro-M as they reccomend. No AFM pipe is for use with a C&L meter.....

otherwise looks like a combo that will make good torque down low, carry the HP to around 5000rpm. How much compression? Your going to need a little more for 11.60's IMHO.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#8
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #8
Yes i will need more than that for 11.60s but i should be close to the 11s for the spring anyway. Its a start.

About the pipe? Wonder why. Are u absolutly sure.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#9
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #9
Isnt a MAF a MAF. Its looks like it will work. The hose on the end is the right size.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#10
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #10
100% SURE, it will not work call AFM and ask. A MAF is not a MAF since a C&L reads different then a Pro-M.

I tried to stick my 76mm C&L in the fender and it was very bad, moved it back to the stock location and it was fine. You can stick a Pro-M on the ground and it will read just fine....

I ran the 4" AFM pipe and 80mm Pro-M AFM powerstack filter, nice combo

 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#11
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #11
Uh oh...that sucks now i need a new MAFS
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#12
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #12
Since it is in the fender color will not matter www.pro-flow.com has the 80mm colored meters on sale $250...hard to beat that price.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#13
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #13
Is there a certain kind of Pro-m that the pipe accepts. I see different ones.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#14
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #14
rick91gt----just talked to the guy i bought the pipe from. He said he was using a 73 mm No problems at all. Its the 3 1/2 also not the 4 inch.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#15
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #15
mike keirstead said:
rick91gt----just talked to the guy i bought the pipe from. He said he was using a 73 mm No problems at all. Its the 3 1/2 also not the 4 inch.
Click to expand...

You have the 3.5 pipe that keeps the meter closer to the stock position, I'd call AFM and talk to them. They told me it would run run properly with that pipe and my 76mm....I went HV 4" pipe and 80mm and it ran much better, smooth and pickup'd a little in the 1/4.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#16
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #16
Ok...so the 4 inch has a different MAF location than the 3 1/2. Ive heard that you can rotate the meter around for smoother idle. Could be i dont know. I think i will try the c&l and if it dosnt work then i will get the pro-m. Is 80mm to big for my combo or is it just right? Anyway thanks for your help. happy new year!
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#17
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #17
80mm is fine....

I just saw on AFM's site that they say the 73mm Maxflow will work with the 3.5" pipe.

3.5" pipe


4" pipe
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#18
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #18
The 3.5 inch puts the meter directly in front of the last elbow.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#19
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #19
Ya thats what mine looks like. I should be good to go. Actually a few people have told it reads better with the c&l the closer you get the meter to the TB. This also could be BS but i am going to do the TRIAL AND ERROR thing. It may work it may not. We will see.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 30, 2003
#20
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #20
The c&l works for sure. Just found out. The guy i got it from was using a 73.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
831
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
New guy here from SE Pa
  • magnum517
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Mar 8, 2020
magnum517
M
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
V
  • Locked
Expired 1993 Cobra, #2931 Teal In Pa
  • venomisback
  • Jul 10, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 25, 2014
Matt Kimberly
  • Locked
SOLD 1983 Mustang Coupe - Street-Legal, Open-Track, NASA American Iron series
  • WesStang
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
12
Views
62K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 10, 2014
WesStang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?