• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

OT: 2005 GT-R Concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66P51GT
  • Start date Start date Apr 12, 2004

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Apr 12, 2004
#1
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #1
Link

I don't know about the rest of you but the new 2005 Mustang has my complete attention. The link above is a concept vehicle built by Saleen Special Vehicles and offers a hint to what we will be seing at open track events in the near future.

One of the most noteable copy points from the article:
Buyers, for example, can order the GT-R’s 440-horsepower engine — the new 5.0-liter “Cammer” — for $14,995 from Ford Racing Performance Parts, along with other production racing parts.

Enjoy...
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Apr 12, 2004
#2
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #2
I'm not diggin the rear spoiler or the side exhaust look, but the rest I can live with.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Apr 12, 2004
#3
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #3
I agree, but isn't that spoiler kinda mandatory for racing? I mean, the Cobra R had a big ass wing too didn't it? I like the way the headlights now remind me of the 70' nose vents a bit, I can just smell some Boss options in the air, I hope.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Apr 12, 2004
#4
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #4
It has some good possibilities....BUT, lose the cheesy wing. That makes it look like an Accord with a fart pipe.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Apr 12, 2004
#5
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #5
67GTA-FB429 said:
It has some good possibilities....BUT, lose the cheesy wing. That makes it look like an Accord with a fart pipe.
Click to expand...
At least it won't sound like an Accord. Agreed with the rear wing for street use. However, it will keep the rear planted at high speed.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Apr 12, 2004
#6
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #6
they should blend it in more. other than that it is pretty sweet.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 12, 2004
#7
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #7
66P51GT said:
At least it won't sound like an Accord. Agreed with the rear wing for street use. However, it will keep the rear planted at high speed.
Click to expand...

nah it wont sound like an accord, more like a miata (since its built in the mazda plant lol)
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 12, 2004
#8
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #8
Lose the wing and the exhaust, the rest is worth the drool I'm wiping from my chin
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Apr 12, 2004
#9
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #9
*cough* Already in the Talk section *cough*

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=448047
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=449166
 

splinterddt

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2000
201
0
16
Florence, CO, U.S.A.
Apr 13, 2004
#10
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #10
I think the car looks great except for the wing. Does "ricer" come to mind? They need to stick with a spoiler the is contoured to the back instead on a wing. The side exhaust is just so-so. Doen't look bad, but not the best feature. Over all, not bad.
 

RogerC62

Founding Member
Feb 2, 2000
833
11
38
Dayton, Ohio
Apr 13, 2004
#11
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #11
I'm really liking it, spoiler included. I refer you to this thread if you haven't already read it, in particular maniacmustangman's comments: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=450796

The side exhaust is ok except it could do without the chrome trim panel. I like the way they did the door bars and the doors. I'd like to see an IRS under it and super/turbocharger.
 

Jon350

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2001
201
0
0
SoCal
Apr 13, 2004
#12
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #12
If any of you follow along with the Trans-Am series, the wing on this thing makes it look like any other contender in teh field. Every single car has a wing similar to the GT-R(althought the emblem is to close to skyline for me). It's not a matter of style but functionality. So my question is, did they connect the spoilers arms to the trunk or the chassis? And is it fully adjustable. Other than that its another racing insipired mustang.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
S
  • Locked
SOLD 2000 Ford Mustang Gt Nasa Cmc Racer Or Hpde
  • SPEED DETAILS
  • May 17, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 17, 2016
SPEED DETAILS
S
Fox T5 To Aod Conversion
  • 86GTVert#2
  • Jun 29, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2016
86GTVert#2
Classic Design Concepts Bad Penny Ford Mustang
  • MRaburn
  • Oct 30, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Oct 30, 2013
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?